Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is another area of concern from a board member: about the number of at-risk students in the school going down and disproportionate discipline.
It's not about "not serving at-risk students well". It is about how Latin will serve more of them in a more equitable way.
MEMBER BUMBAUGH: So your school has
5 a very good reputation in this city, and I think
6 it's well earned. I have a lot of friends and
7 former student who send their children there, and
8 they're happy with your school.
9 You began to address some of the
10 issues that I want to raise, but I just feel the
11 need to state them publicly, which is -- I will
12 say personally, it gets exhausting to see the
13 highest-ranked academic schools in this city
14 consistently have among the lowest at-risk
15 populations.
16 In a city where almost 50 percent of
17 kids are at risk, your numbers are 6.8 in the
18 middle school and 16.8 in the high school. It
19 makes it easier to achieve Tier 1 status.
20 MR. ANDERSON: Sir --
21 MEMBER BUMBAUGH: Furthermore, when I
22 look and I see that the at-risk students are
(202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com
Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc.
42
1 being suspended at rates of 26.6 percent, it's
2 frustrating.
3 MR. ANDERSON: Yeah.
4 MEMBER BUMBAUGH: So I just want to
5 say I support a school like Washington Latin
6 being made available to more students, and
7 particularly at-risk student. I also would like
8 to say that when you come back here next year, I
9 do hope to see the suspension rates much lower
10 for at-risk students.
11 And I -- and the harder thing is, we
12 hear so many of the highly regarded academic
13 schools say they're interested in equity and
14 diversity, and we just don't see their at-risk
15 numbers move.
16 We do see the suspension rates go
17 down, which is progress, but get -- you know,
18 this -- you chose to open a school in Washington,
19 D.C., so serve the children who live here.
20 MR. ANDERSON: And actually, one of
21 the ways that we think we can do that is by
22 opening a new school. I'll tell you why. With
(202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com
Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc.
43
1 the lottery and the sibling preference, we only
2 have 120 new spots every year, and when we have a
3 sibling preference that accounts for anywhere
4 from 30 to 45 percent of those students, it's
5 hard to move the needle.
6 And one of the ways that we're hoping
7 to do this is by changing some of our recruitment
8 methods, to try to attract even more of those at9 risk families to apply. That's one of the things
10 we're committed to, both for our current campus
11 and for a new campus.
12 So thank you.
I would have left this part out pp.
Anonymous wrote:Here is another area of concern from a board member: about the number of at-risk students in the school going down and disproportionate discipline.
It's not about "not serving at-risk students well". It is about how Latin will serve more of them in a more equitable way.
MEMBER BUMBAUGH: So your school has
5 a very good reputation in this city, and I think
6 it's well earned. I have a lot of friends and
7 former student who send their children there, and
8 they're happy with your school.
9 You began to address some of the
10 issues that I want to raise, but I just feel the
11 need to state them publicly, which is -- I will
12 say personally, it gets exhausting to see the
13 highest-ranked academic schools in this city
14 consistently have among the lowest at-risk
15 populations.
16 In a city where almost 50 percent of
17 kids are at risk, your numbers are 6.8 in the
18 middle school and 16.8 in the high school. It
19 makes it easier to achieve Tier 1 status.
20 MR. ANDERSON: Sir --
21 MEMBER BUMBAUGH: Furthermore, when I
22 look and I see that the at-risk students are
(202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com
Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc.
42
1 being suspended at rates of 26.6 percent, it's
2 frustrating.
3 MR. ANDERSON: Yeah.
4 MEMBER BUMBAUGH: So I just want to
5 say I support a school like Washington Latin
6 being made available to more students, and
7 particularly at-risk student. I also would like
8 to say that when you come back here next year, I
9 do hope to see the suspension rates much lower
10 for at-risk students.
11 And I -- and the harder thing is, we
12 hear so many of the highly regarded academic
13 schools say they're interested in equity and
14 diversity, and we just don't see their at-risk
15 numbers move.
16 We do see the suspension rates go
17 down, which is progress, but get -- you know,
18 this -- you chose to open a school in Washington,
19 D.C., so serve the children who live here.
20 MR. ANDERSON: And actually, one of
21 the ways that we think we can do that is by
22 opening a new school. I'll tell you why. With
(202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com
Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc.
43
1 the lottery and the sibling preference, we only
2 have 120 new spots every year, and when we have a
3 sibling preference that accounts for anywhere
4 from 30 to 45 percent of those students, it's
5 hard to move the needle.
6 And one of the ways that we're hoping
7 to do this is by changing some of our recruitment
8 methods, to try to attract even more of those at9 risk families to apply. That's one of the things
10 we're committed to, both for our current campus
11 and for a new campus.
12 So thank you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't keep straight if--according to posters here---Washington Latin is crappy and should never be allowed to open a second campus because it a) doesn't serve its at-risk population well or b) is trying to serve more at-risk students or c) doesn't serve its children-of-blue-chip-school alum well.
You all are too much![]()
I cannot, in the end, buy the argument that Latin is somehow undeserving of opening a second campus. By any metric, it's a good school, doing good work, in high demand with a commitment to staying diverse. DC most certainly needs more seats in schools like this.
Yes, it is trying to serve more at risk students but it doesn't serve it's current at risk population very well. You can read all about it in the charter board meeting transcript when Latin applied to expand.
Anonymous wrote:I can't keep straight if--according to posters here---Washington Latin is crappy and should never be allowed to open a second campus because it a) doesn't serve its at-risk population well or b) is trying to serve more at-risk students or c) doesn't serve its children-of-blue-chip-school alum well.
You all are too much![]()
I cannot, in the end, buy the argument that Latin is somehow undeserving of opening a second campus. By any metric, it's a good school, doing good work, in high demand with a commitment to staying diverse. DC most certainly needs more seats in schools like this.
Anonymous wrote:Source:
https://latinpcs.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/WLPCS-School-Profile-2019-2020.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Absolutely, our admissions committee members appreciate go-getters, resourceful and intellectually curious students who take the initiative to work beyond the curricula offered at their high schools and standard homeschooling programs.
So this is an argument against a school like Latin offering more APs and rather people going after them independently? Those who can afford it, I mean?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Washington Latins "model", Boston Latin, is a test in school. Since WL is not, there has been a tension in its mission/vision since it's inception. This is not new. It's the plus and minus of being far more equitable (in one way - lottery based with weighted preferences that are not academic) than BL. If you disagree with that, you would need to change its structure to test in - like a Walls, Ellington, Banneker, TJ or Boston Latin. It is what it is.
I don't agree. This view of how Washington Latin must work--shared by the program's leadership-- is a cop out. Latin's leadership and teachers could offer far more rigor to the most advanced students. At BASIS, another DC charter school, seniors can't graduate unless they've passed at least half a dozen AP exams.
For example, admins won't permit 5th and 6th graders to take languages other than Latin, although a good many come in from DC public school language immersion programs for Spanish, Chinese and French. Some of the UMC parents of language immersion graduates team up to hire pricey tutors to help kids retain language skills, meaning that it's mostly the former low SES language immersion students at Latin who lose their skills. This policy could easily be changed. Also, math is tracked at Latin in middle school, but not humanities subjects, another policy that could be changed. Social promotion could also be jettisoned to help support more advanced academics.
Latin requires significantly more credits than other DC High Schools in order to graduate. Administration has purposefully chosen which AP classes are offered based on their academic/intellectual value. A teacher not bound by the AP US History course curriculum, for example, has much more leeway to create a meaningful course that's more than a collection of facts to be tested. A thing about Latin is you have to trust the administration and teachers to be professionals and have student's best interests in mind; with the mission and vision-statement always at the forefront. So far, they have earned my trust--more than the AP momey-making machine has!
Fabulous in theory, not so hot in practice. It's useful for kids to have a clutch of high AP scores under their belts when applying to colleges, no matter what sort of schools they attended.
Just so you know: college admissions offices receive what's know as a school "snap shot" from the high school guidance department with every application. This snapshot lays out the courses available in the school and ranks them according to difficulty. The most difficult course at Latin is not an AP course. College admissions staff want students who have taken the most difficult classes available at their school and will compare this snapshot with the students' transcripts. A raft of AP's with high scores is not an entrance ticket by any means--money: tutors and a good zip code can buy all that. Have you been through this before?
I work in college admissions and don't agree.
Which course at Latin is tougher than...Physics 2, Physics C Mechanics, Physics C Electricity and Magnetism, BC Calculus, AP languages?
Interviewing applicants for your alma mater does not count as working in admissions.
I concur. I'm an admissions officer at a university in the District. My children attend a DC public charter school.
Cool. And as an admissions officer, you are telling me that you consider the raw number of APs a student takeswithout considering the profile that comes from the high school? Are you telling me a student applying to your school gets dinged in admissions if their school doesn't offer your list: Physics 2, Physics C Mechanics, Physics C Electricity and Magnetism, BC Calculus?
I am not the PP, but I think he thought you were saying that Latin had harder classes than *any* AP class. So he was asking what the magic class was that was harder than the above classes. If Latin doesn't offer any of the above classes, though, then there's obviously a real problem with its difficulty in STEM. Does Latin seriously not offer any of those classes?
And, also, FWIW, a kid will absolutely get credit for taking the hardest courses his school offers AND will absolutely get dinged if the school doesn't have hard enough classes. There's a reason that most schools get no one into HYPSMC ever and it's not that they have never had a kid capable of it... It's that they don't adequately prepare their kids for admissions. One way they don't do that is that they don't have hard enough courses.
That's not a problem at Latin--hard enough classes, and good record of admissions to HYPSMC . I had to look that up![]()
Not true. For example, none admitted to HYPSMC from Class of 2020.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Absolutely, our admissions committee members appreciate go-getters, resourceful and intellectually curious students who take the initiative to work beyond the curricula offered at their high schools and standard homeschooling programs.
So this is an argument against a school like Latin offering more APs and rather people going after them independently? Those who can afford it, I mean?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Washington Latins "model", Boston Latin, is a test in school. Since WL is not, there has been a tension in its mission/vision since it's inception. This is not new. It's the plus and minus of being far more equitable (in one way - lottery based with weighted preferences that are not academic) than BL. If you disagree with that, you would need to change its structure to test in - like a Walls, Ellington, Banneker, TJ or Boston Latin. It is what it is.
I don't agree. This view of how Washington Latin must work--shared by the program's leadership-- is a cop out. Latin's leadership and teachers could offer far more rigor to the most advanced students. At BASIS, another DC charter school, seniors can't graduate unless they've passed at least half a dozen AP exams.
For example, admins won't permit 5th and 6th graders to take languages other than Latin, although a good many come in from DC public school language immersion programs for Spanish, Chinese and French. Some of the UMC parents of language immersion graduates team up to hire pricey tutors to help kids retain language skills, meaning that it's mostly the former low SES language immersion students at Latin who lose their skills. This policy could easily be changed. Also, math is tracked at Latin in middle school, but not humanities subjects, another policy that could be changed. Social promotion could also be jettisoned to help support more advanced academics.
Latin requires significantly more credits than other DC High Schools in order to graduate. Administration has purposefully chosen which AP classes are offered based on their academic/intellectual value. A teacher not bound by the AP US History course curriculum, for example, has much more leeway to create a meaningful course that's more than a collection of facts to be tested. A thing about Latin is you have to trust the administration and teachers to be professionals and have student's best interests in mind; with the mission and vision-statement always at the forefront. So far, they have earned my trust--more than the AP momey-making machine has!
Fabulous in theory, not so hot in practice. It's useful for kids to have a clutch of high AP scores under their belts when applying to colleges, no matter what sort of schools they attended.
Just so you know: college admissions offices receive what's know as a school "snap shot" from the high school guidance department with every application. This snapshot lays out the courses available in the school and ranks them according to difficulty. The most difficult course at Latin is not an AP course. College admissions staff want students who have taken the most difficult classes available at their school and will compare this snapshot with the students' transcripts. A raft of AP's with high scores is not an entrance ticket by any means--money: tutors and a good zip code can buy all that. Have you been through this before?
I work in college admissions and don't agree.
Which course at Latin is tougher than...Physics 2, Physics C Mechanics, Physics C Electricity and Magnetism, BC Calculus, AP languages?
Interviewing applicants for your alma mater does not count as working in admissions.
I concur. I'm an admissions officer at a university in the District. My children attend a DC public charter school.
Cool. And as an admissions officer, you are telling me that you consider the raw number of APs a student takeswithout considering the profile that comes from the high school? Are you telling me a student applying to your school gets dinged in admissions if their school doesn't offer your list: Physics 2, Physics C Mechanics, Physics C Electricity and Magnetism, BC Calculus?
I am not the PP, but I think he thought you were saying that Latin had harder classes than *any* AP class. So he was asking what the magic class was that was harder than the above classes. If Latin doesn't offer any of the above classes, though, then there's obviously a real problem with its difficulty in STEM. Does Latin seriously not offer any of those classes?
And, also, FWIW, a kid will absolutely get credit for taking the hardest courses his school offers AND will absolutely get dinged if the school doesn't have hard enough classes. There's a reason that most schools get no one into HYPSMC ever and it's not that they have never had a kid capable of it... It's that they don't adequately prepare their kids for admissions. One way they don't do that is that they don't have hard enough courses.
That's not a problem at Latin--hard enough classes, and good record of admissions to HYPSMC . I had to look that up![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are so many ways outside of school for a motivated kid to carry on in Spanish if that's their be all, end all - or - choose a school that offers Spanish. Meanwhile Latin offers many things others schools don't. I am curious if they will one day offer Spanish... I think it could be done starting in Grade 5. But can't say I'm sympathetic to this line of critique over the school making other choiçes.
There is some support for offering Spanish ( instead of French ) as a language at the second campus. We’ll see if it happens.
You'd think that Latin, campus 1,2 or both, would offer advanced Spanish and maybe Mandarin to the middle school kids who can handle it simply to improve the program's AP language scores down the track.
At Wilson, Oyster-Adams grads routinely take AP Spanish Language in 9th grade and AP Spanish lit in 10th grade and score 5s. The practice can't be hurting Wilson in college admissions. It's not as though Latin doesn't already teach Spanish.
Latin does not already teach Spanish. You are misinformed