Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone please summarize? If not school then what
It is school, just not the CRT stuff or vaccine or mask mandates. They’re angry that schools stayed closed for as long as they did and that the Democrats seemed dismissive of parents’ concerns about the resulting disruption and learning loss. I certainly understand their concerns but they do come off a bit self centered… like all that matters is them and their family, not the healthcare workers or teachers or the medically vulnerable. I think Democrats’ biggest mistake wasn’t necessarily closing schools, but for not showing more concern about the fallout now. Terry couldn’t even manage to fake it. He just didn’t connect with suburban women as much as he needed to.
Yes, we all know this is why Youngkin won suburban moms who previously voted Democratic. Why is this such big news to this Pamela lady? Everybody else knew this.
McAuliffe was just a boring, uninspiring candidate. If we'd had someone young, fresh, more progressive, they would have won.
You still don't seem to get it. There is now a backlash to your "progressive" movement. It's not selling.
+1 I don't want someone progressive anything. I want someone under 60, sane, fiscally smart and not morally repugnant. Youngkin fit that metric but I would have voted for a Democrat had that choice been available.
Any Democrat who fits that basic metric will come with a side of woke. That's not going to work for me.
That's right. Nothing will make you give up your racism, right? Slavery wasn't that bad was it?
What exactly do progressive woke people offer that will get rid of racism? They love to say that white people and this country is racist no matter what we do because of our history. There is no solution, no absolution, no path to forgiveness or making things right. That’s what people are tired of. If progressives actually presented real solutions for change they’d get more votes. But instead we are supposed to learn how terrible we are and then… nothing.
You completely missed the message. It’s more like you are “racist” if you don’t want to acknowledge current racism and take steps to eradicate.
Capisce?
I acknowledge it. Now, what are the next steps?
That is what I’m highlighting. No one ever goes beyond what you said. .
1) Reflect on your own perspectives, opinions, and actions.
2) Learn about how racism persists in US today. Look for other perspectives. Listen. Learn.
3) Influence in your spheres. Say something. Look at who you know and talk to in your community. Look for ways to support black-owned businesses. Etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone please summarize? If not school then what
It is school, just not the CRT stuff or vaccine or mask mandates. They’re angry that schools stayed closed for as long as they did and that the Democrats seemed dismissive of parents’ concerns about the resulting disruption and learning loss. I certainly understand their concerns but they do come off a bit self centered… like all that matters is them and their family, not the healthcare workers or teachers or the medically vulnerable. I think Democrats’ biggest mistake wasn’t necessarily closing schools, but for not showing more concern about the fallout now. Terry couldn’t even manage to fake it. He just didn’t connect with suburban women as much as he needed to.
Yes, we all know this is why Youngkin won suburban moms who previously voted Democratic. Why is this such big news to this Pamela lady? Everybody else knew this.
McAuliffe was just a boring, uninspiring candidate. If we'd had someone young, fresh, more progressive, they would have won.
You still don't seem to get it. There is now a backlash to your "progressive" movement. It's not selling.
+1 I don't want someone progressive anything. I want someone under 60, sane, fiscally smart and not morally repugnant. Youngkin fit that metric but I would have voted for a Democrat had that choice been available.
Any Democrat who fits that basic metric will come with a side of woke. That's not going to work for me.
That's right. Nothing will make you give up your racism, right? Slavery wasn't that bad was it?
What exactly do progressive woke people offer that will get rid of racism? They love to say that white people and this country is racist no matter what we do because of our history. There is no solution, no absolution, no path to forgiveness or making things right. That’s what people are tired of. If progressives actually presented real solutions for change they’d get more votes. But instead we are supposed to learn how terrible we are and then… nothing.
You completely missed the message. It’s more like you are “racist” if you don’t want to acknowledge current racism and take steps to eradicate.
Capisce?
I acknowledge it. Now, what are the next steps?
That is what I’m highlighting. No one ever goes beyond what you said. .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you've posted this a ridiculous number of times. *yawn*
Every single time, it’s in response to some dumba$$ comment like “Youngkin didn’t say anything that is an attack on women’s rights.”
If we can all stop posting dumba$$ comments like that and all agree that he’s pro-life and will sign anti-abortion legislation then we never need to post it again.
NP. Can we agree that any legislation would need to start in the General Assembly? The governor doesn't have the authority to ban abortion by executive order.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you've posted this a ridiculous number of times. *yawn*
Every single time, it’s in response to some dumba$$ comment like “Youngkin didn’t say anything that is an attack on women’s rights.”
If we can all stop posting dumba$$ comments like that and all agree that he’s pro-life and will sign anti-abortion legislation then we never need to post it again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone please summarize? If not school then what
It is school, just not the CRT stuff or vaccine or mask mandates. They’re angry that schools stayed closed for as long as they did and that the Democrats seemed dismissive of parents’ concerns about the resulting disruption and learning loss. I certainly understand their concerns but they do come off a bit self centered… like all that matters is them and their family, not the healthcare workers or teachers or the medically vulnerable. I think Democrats’ biggest mistake wasn’t necessarily closing schools, but for not showing more concern about the fallout now. Terry couldn’t even manage to fake it. He just didn’t connect with suburban women as much as he needed to.
Yes, we all know this is why Youngkin won suburban moms who previously voted Democratic. Why is this such big news to this Pamela lady? Everybody else knew this.
McAuliffe was just a boring, uninspiring candidate. If we'd had someone young, fresh, more progressive, they would have won.
You still don't seem to get it. There is now a backlash to your "progressive" movement. It's not selling.
+1 I don't want someone progressive anything. I want someone under 60, sane, fiscally smart and not morally repugnant. Youngkin fit that metric but I would have voted for a Democrat had that choice been available.
Any Democrat who fits that basic metric will come with a side of woke. That's not going to work for me.
That's right. Nothing will make you give up your racism, right? Slavery wasn't that bad was it?
What exactly do progressive woke people offer that will get rid of racism? They love to say that white people and this country is racist no matter what we do because of our history. There is no solution, no absolution, no path to forgiveness or making things right. That’s what people are tired of. If progressives actually presented real solutions for change they’d get more votes. But instead we are supposed to learn how terrible we are and then… nothing.
You completely missed the message. It’s more like you are “racist” if you don’t want to acknowledge current racism and take steps to eradicate.
Capisce?
Anonymous wrote:I think you've posted this a ridiculous number of times. *yawn*
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s why he spent so much energy hollering “Trump Trump and Trump but Trump Donald Trump Trump Trump Trump!”
"Breaking news: Rich, old white man defeats rich, old white man in Virginia's governor's race."
Well, the loser is old. The winner is in the prime of his life.
DP
A pro-life DB willing to bend over and push the big lie.
Super loser.
You're still out-of-sorts about Terry's loss, aren't you? Well, take the weekend to get your tantrums out before you head back to school on Monday.
You voted for a spineless lackey who DGAF about democracy or women or schools. Question is were you duped or are those qualities you admire?
Youngkin didn’t say anything that is an attack on women’s rights.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone please summarize? If not school then what
It is school, just not the CRT stuff or vaccine or mask mandates. They’re angry that schools stayed closed for as long as they did and that the Democrats seemed dismissive of parents’ concerns about the resulting disruption and learning loss. I certainly understand their concerns but they do come off a bit self centered… like all that matters is them and their family, not the healthcare workers or teachers or the medically vulnerable. I think Democrats’ biggest mistake wasn’t necessarily closing schools, but for not showing more concern about the fallout now. Terry couldn’t even manage to fake it. He just didn’t connect with suburban women as much as he needed to.
Yes, we all know this is why Youngkin won suburban moms who previously voted Democratic. Why is this such big news to this Pamela lady? Everybody else knew this.
McAuliffe was just a boring, uninspiring candidate. If we'd had someone young, fresh, more progressive, they would have won.
You still don't seem to get it. There is now a backlash to your "progressive" movement. It's not selling.
+1 I don't want someone progressive anything. I want someone under 60, sane, fiscally smart and not morally repugnant. Youngkin fit that metric but I would have voted for a Democrat had that choice been available.
Any Democrat who fits that basic metric will come with a side of woke. That's not going to work for me.
That's right. Nothing will make you give up your racism, right? Slavery wasn't that bad was it?
What exactly do progressive woke people offer that will get rid of racism? They love to say that white people and this country is racist no matter what we do because of our history. There is no solution, no absolution, no path to forgiveness or making things right. That’s what people are tired of. If progressives actually presented real solutions for change they’d get more votes. But instead we are supposed to learn how terrible we are and then… nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone please summarize? If not school then what
It is school, just not the CRT stuff or vaccine or mask mandates. They’re angry that schools stayed closed for as long as they did and that the Democrats seemed dismissive of parents’ concerns about the resulting disruption and learning loss. I certainly understand their concerns but they do come off a bit self centered… like all that matters is them and their family, not the healthcare workers or teachers or the medically vulnerable. I think Democrats’ biggest mistake wasn’t necessarily closing schools, but for not showing more concern about the fallout now. Terry couldn’t even manage to fake it. He just didn’t connect with suburban women as much as he needed to.
Yes, we all know this is why Youngkin won suburban moms who previously voted Democratic. Why is this such big news to this Pamela lady? Everybody else knew this.
McAuliffe was just a boring, uninspiring candidate. If we'd had someone young, fresh, more progressive, they would have won.
You still don't seem to get it. There is now a backlash to your "progressive" movement. It's not selling.
+1 I don't want someone progressive anything. I want someone under 60, sane, fiscally smart and not morally repugnant. Youngkin fit that metric but I would have voted for a Democrat had that choice been available.
Any Democrat who fits that basic metric will come with a side of woke. That's not going to work for me.
That's right. Nothing will make you give up your racism, right? Slavery wasn't that bad was it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s why he spent so much energy hollering “Trump Trump and Trump but Trump Donald Trump Trump Trump Trump!”
"Breaking news: Rich, old white man defeats rich, old white man in Virginia's governor's race."
Well, the loser is old. The winner is in the prime of his life.
DP
A pro-life DB willing to bend over and push the big lie.
Super loser.
You're still out-of-sorts about Terry's loss, aren't you? Well, take the weekend to get your tantrums out before you head back to school on Monday.
You voted for a spineless lackey who DGAF about democracy or women or schools. Question is were you duped or are those qualities you admire?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s why he spent so much energy hollering “Trump Trump and Trump but Trump Donald Trump Trump Trump Trump!”
"Breaking news: Rich, old white man defeats rich, old white man in Virginia's governor's race."
Well, the loser is old. The winner is in the prime of his life.
DP
A pro-life DB willing to bend over and push the big lie.
Super loser.
You're still out-of-sorts about Terry's loss, aren't you? Well, take the weekend to get your tantrums out before you head back to school on Monday.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s why he spent so much energy hollering “Trump Trump and Trump but Trump Donald Trump Trump Trump Trump!”
"Breaking news: Rich, old white man defeats rich, old white man in Virginia's governor's race."
Well, the loser is old. The winner is in the prime of his life.
DP
A pro-life DB willing to bend over and push the big lie.
Super loser.
You're still out-of-sorts about Terry's loss, aren't you? Well, take the weekend to get your tantrums out before you head back to school on Monday.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone please summarize? If not school then what
It is school, just not the CRT stuff or vaccine or mask mandates. They’re angry that schools stayed closed for as long as they did and that the Democrats seemed dismissive of parents’ concerns about the resulting disruption and learning loss. I certainly understand their concerns but they do come off a bit self centered… like all that matters is them and their family, not the healthcare workers or teachers or the medically vulnerable. I think Democrats’ biggest mistake wasn’t necessarily closing schools, but for not showing more concern about the fallout now. Terry couldn’t even manage to fake it. He just didn’t connect with suburban women as much as he needed to.
Yes, we all know this is why Youngkin won suburban moms who previously voted Democratic. Why is this such big news to this Pamela lady? Everybody else knew this.
McAuliffe was just a boring, uninspiring candidate. If we'd had someone young, fresh, more progressive, they would have won.
You still don't seem to get it. There is now a backlash to your "progressive" movement. It's not selling.
+1 I don't want someone progressive anything. I want someone under 60, sane, fiscally smart and not morally repugnant. Youngkin fit that metric but I would have voted for a Democrat had that choice been available.
Any Democrat who fits that basic metric will come with a side of woke. That's not going to work for me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s why he spent so much energy hollering “Trump Trump and Trump but Trump Donald Trump Trump Trump Trump!”
"Breaking news: Rich, old white man defeats rich, old white man in Virginia's governor's race."
Well, the loser is old. The winner is in the prime of his life.
DP
A pro-life DB willing to bend over and push the big lie.
Super loser.
