Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Women these days days are more masculine than ever.

I saw a thread on twitter that was something like "a brief history of women are too masculine and men are too feminine." And it was like a century or more of headlines where newspapers and media outlets were complaining that men "these days" were becoming more effeminate and women these days were becoming more masculine. Just generation after generation of this bullshit. Related news flash - kids these days aren't any more disrespectful than kids in the olden days.

Toxic masculinity bs and trans bs has pushed men to become feminine and the feminist movement had taught women to be masculine. You know the type that claim they don’t need men for anything but men built this world, they work physical labor jobs that women won’t do, they provide, etc. Then they are 35 and single with no man.

They may have built many of the buildings, but that is far from what is most important in our world.

Who carried, fed and raised all of the people in the world??

How about educating most of tomorrow's citizens?

Man also carried out most of the violence--including murders, rapes and child molestations (as well as family abandonments).... So they have a mixed track record.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Women these days days are more masculine than ever.

I saw a thread on twitter that was something like "a brief history of women are too masculine and men are too feminine." And it was like a century or more of headlines where newspapers and media outlets were complaining that men "these days" were becoming more effeminate and women these days were becoming more masculine. Just generation after generation of this bullshit. Related news flash - kids these days aren't any more disrespectful than kids in the olden days.

Toxic masculinity bs and trans bs has pushed men to become feminine and the feminist movement had taught women to be masculine. You know the type that claim they don’t need men for anything but men built this world, they work physical labor jobs that women won’t do, they provide, etc. Then they are 35 and single with no man.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t matter. The type of men that these women want - tall, educated, money, etc., make up about 20% of men. These men have options and are less likely to settle down or settle with one of them. This is why women have so many issues getting married. Many bring nothing or very little to the table but expect the most. If you’re a man who is in the top 20%, you better be a 10 across the board. You can’t be average looking woman electing that caliber of a man.

Women these days days are more masculine than every. They don’t cook, don’t clean, don’t want to raise their kids, don’t want to have sex often, and don’t want to keep up with their looks. Why would a man who is a high caliber man settle for that? Any man in general for that instance. This is why men don’t want to get married. You give them half your money and provide for them with little or nothing in return.

It’s almost like the incel parts of the internet disable Google.

The more educated you are the more likely you will marry. The wealthier you are, the more likely it is you will marry.

And you’re telling on yourself when you say not having sex often is a male trait. Only among you and your “friends” my dude.

I’m a woman and this is the truth. I’m not a man. I know so many women who want a man over 6ft, makes 6 figures or more, attractive with a good body and all his hair, etc., but they bring nothing to the table. I know several women who don’t cook, don’t clean, and have abandoned many feminine traits. Then you all wonder why you’re 35 with no kids and no man who wants you.

Hmm. I thought you were an incel too, but I guess you're a Christian Boomer.

You just don’t like being confronted with the truth.

Ha. For starters I have been married to a great man for 15 years and I’m 39. I would never have dreamed cooking or cleaning for him when we were dating or engaged. My only “feminine trait” I have is my appearance and I sure as heck didn’t dress or act feminine to get a man. You’d probably think I brought nothing to the table. And yet I am happily married to a man who met my standards. In fact I’m probably happily married *because* he met my standards.

But go on about how women should do free cooking and cleaning for the privilege of marrying a guy they don’t really want.

You’re his beard.

You sound bitter. Is it because you couldn’t find a tall, handsome, successful man to marry, or because you aren’t one yourself?

dp height doesn't always make someone handsome. Plenty of short men who are handsome...Jeremy Jordan for one!