Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 09:22     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:MCPS and MOCO is on a trashy path. In the last two summers:
- Get rid of MVA "because we dont have budgets"
- Increase diversity bullshit "because we now have budget"
- Pay shitload to former corrupt superintendent
- Increase property taxes "because we need more budget"
- Rezone school district "because we don't have budget"

Did i get all of what happened in last 18 months?




The new superintendent also got a huge pay raise and the BOE is asking for a pay raise for themselves too (and how do they get all that time off work and is their job paying them days they are doing BOE matters?) They also kept many in Central Office who were the problem and need to be terminated.
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 09:20     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wheaton Mall v Montgomery Mall v White Flint Mall

Can we get back to eminent domain of White Flint


Yes please eminent domain of white flint. That is a big gaping pit.


WHY? Mid-County is getting Woodward which is right there. You don't need another school in that area. You need one in DSS or Takoma or lower Siliver Spring, even White Oak.

Same thing with Wheaton Mall. There are several schools near it. That's NOT where the need is.
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 09:20     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:My kid will go from WJ to Wheaton under option 3. This is great for him and my property value. Who doesn't love Wheaton


So jealous!
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 09:19     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:Wheaton Mall v Montgomery Mall v White Flint Mall

Can we get back to eminent domain of White Flint


Yes please eminent domain of white flint. That is a big gaping pit.
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 09:10     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
MCPS and MOCO is on a trashy path. In the last two summers:
- Get rid of MVA "because we dont have budgets"
- Increase diversity bullshit "because we now have budget"
- Pay shitload to former corrupt superintendent
- Increase property taxes "because we need more budget"
- Rezone school district "because we don't have budget"

Did i get all of what happened in last 18 months?


Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 08:09     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Holy Trinity. Option 3. it's a sign. Dios mio
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 08:08     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wheaton Mall v Montgomery Mall v White Flint Mall

Can we get back to eminent domain of White Flint


If they put any housing in white flint it will stress Woodward capacity


Option 3 solves for this. They'll be bussed somewhere else
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 08:07     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My kid will go from WJ to Wheaton under option 3. This is great for him and my property value. Who doesn't love Wheaton


You think you are being funny but lots of kids choose Wheaton in the DCC choice process because of the engineering lrogram


I'm being serious. He can be a successful engineer. So lucky if we get Wheaton. WJ is not good
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 08:04     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:My kid will go from WJ to Wheaton under option 3. This is great for him and my property value. Who doesn't love Wheaton


You think you are being funny but lots of kids choose Wheaton in the DCC choice process because of the engineering lrogram
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 08:04     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:Wheaton Mall v Montgomery Mall v White Flint Mall

Can we get back to eminent domain of White Flint


If they put any housing in white flint it will stress Woodward capacity
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 08:03     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Wheaton Mall v Montgomery Mall v White Flint Mall

Can we get back to eminent domain of White Flint
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 07:59     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
My kid will go from WJ to Wheaton under option 3. This is great for him and my property value. Who doesn't love Wheaton
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 07:58     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:No one should be allowed to go to their home school, everyone should be lotteried into schools and get to spend more time on buses.


+1

Life is a lottery. People on the west just want more chips at the rigged casino. It's coming to an end with option 3 baby
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 07:57     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Option 3 is move to Virginia!


Option 3 is option flee!


And fleas
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2025 07:56     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I was expecting a range of options on the demographics/equalizing FARMS dimension. But options 1, 2 and 4 do basically nothing to improve on that front, or in some cases make things worse. And option 3 is only a moderate improvement, the kind of thing I would have expected as a middle-ground option between "no improvement on demographics/diversity" and "significant improvement on demographics/diversity."

I feel like all the options other than #3 are non-starters. #3 has plenty of flaws but it feels like we need to focus on iterating off of it to make it better. It's ridiculous to have some schools with 6% FARMS rates and some schools with over 60% FARMS rates (or up to 75% at some middle schools!) and have 3 of the 4 options not do a thing to try to address that.


Option 3 will destroy neighborhoods plain and simple. Only a complete idiot should suggest that option 3 should even exist.


Just think of neighborhoods more broadly. I support option 3. It is the best option for all children.


Why is that? What do you think will improve for all children?


Same money. Same resources. Same teachers. Same. Equality. The dream of MLK. It's great