Anonymous wrote:Heard that all Nancy’s family members were polygraph tested and all of them passed with flying colors.
Also interesting to note - as of today there are NO official suspects in the case.
They are basically at a standstill right now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The investigation is seriously lagging.
An arrest should have been made by now.
They don't have a suspect. There will never be an arrest.
The local police botched this from the beginning and it's really sad. Almost no one is abducted today without a trace; especially when there's camera footage. And they are still "discovering" photos 6 weeks later? WTH? Police also let a pizza delivery guy enter the crime scene in the 1st days of the investigation. Total ineptitude. Savannah should hire a private investigator.
You can say all of that but there is surprisingly little evidence. No dna hits, no other camera info. Random crimes like this are hard.
This brilliant abductor used leaves from a porch plant to cover the camera which shows how poorly planned and executed this was. There were more mistakes made but the police flubbed it from the beginning and likely missed a bunch of evidence. They found similar gloves on the trail in the area near the home 2 weeks later? Just obtaining additional photos 6 weeks later? Spending too much time focused on neighbors or family perhaps?
When I looked up the County stats, the sheriffs office deals with about a half dozen homicides a year. And you would assume most of them are pretty straightforward, with witnesses or where the perpetrator is pretty obvious. Compare to DC which had 127 homicides last year. I think it's unrealistic to expect most agencies to have the kind of expertise we see on CSI Miami or whatever, unfortunately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The investigation is seriously lagging.
An arrest should have been made by now.
They don't have a suspect. There will never be an arrest.
The local police botched this from the beginning and it's really sad. Almost no one is abducted today without a trace; especially when there's camera footage. And they are still "discovering" photos 6 weeks later? WTH? Police also let a pizza delivery guy enter the crime scene in the 1st days of the investigation. Total ineptitude. Savannah should hire a private investigator.
You can say all of that but there is surprisingly little evidence. No dna hits, no other camera info. Random crimes like this are hard.
This brilliant abductor used leaves from a porch plant to cover the camera which shows how poorly planned and executed this was. There were more mistakes made but the police flubbed it from the beginning and likely missed a bunch of evidence. They found similar gloves on the trail in the area near the home 2 weeks later? Just obtaining additional photos 6 weeks later? Spending too much time focused on neighbors or family perhaps?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The investigation is seriously lagging.
An arrest should have been made by now.
They don't have a suspect. There will never be an arrest.
The local police botched this from the beginning and it's really sad. Almost no one is abducted today without a trace; especially when there's camera footage. And they are still "discovering" photos 6 weeks later? WTH? Police also let a pizza delivery guy enter the crime scene in the 1st days of the investigation. Total ineptitude. Savannah should hire a private investigator.
You can say all of that but there is surprisingly little evidence. No dna hits, no other camera info. Random crimes like this are hard.
This brilliant abductor used leaves from a porch plant to cover the camera which shows how poorly planned and executed this was. There were more mistakes made but the police flubbed it from the beginning and likely missed a bunch of evidence. They found similar gloves on the trail in the area near the home 2 weeks later? Just obtaining additional photos 6 weeks later? Spending too much time focused on neighbors or family perhaps?
He planned it well enough so that he was wearing double gloves, the mask and was seemingly well prepared, left no DNA evidence, but not well enough that he didn’t account for the cameras. That’s puzzling to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The investigation is seriously lagging.
An arrest should have been made by now.
They don't have a suspect. There will never be an arrest.
The local police botched this from the beginning and it's really sad. Almost no one is abducted today without a trace; especially when there's camera footage. And they are still "discovering" photos 6 weeks later? WTH? Police also let a pizza delivery guy enter the crime scene in the 1st days of the investigation. Total ineptitude. Savannah should hire a private investigator.
You can say all of that but there is surprisingly little evidence. No dna hits, no other camera info. Random crimes like this are hard.
This brilliant abductor used leaves from a porch plant to cover the camera which shows how poorly planned and executed this was. There were more mistakes made but the police flubbed it from the beginning and likely missed a bunch of evidence. They found similar gloves on the trail in the area near the home 2 weeks later? Just obtaining additional photos 6 weeks later? Spending too much time focused on neighbors or family perhaps?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The investigation is seriously lagging.
An arrest should have been made by now.
They don't have a suspect. There will never be an arrest.
The local police botched this from the beginning and it's really sad. Almost no one is abducted today without a trace; especially when there's camera footage. And they are still "discovering" photos 6 weeks later? WTH? Police also let a pizza delivery guy enter the crime scene in the 1st days of the investigation. Total ineptitude. Savannah should hire a private investigator.
You can say all of that but there is surprisingly little evidence. No dna hits, no other camera info. Random crimes like this are hard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Soooo, that sheriff gave an interview today and all I can say is what the hell is going on.
https://www.today.com/news/nancy-guthrie-update-latest-sheriff-interview-today-rcna263320
Some highlights:
"Kreutz [NBC reporter] asked Nanos [sheriff] if it's possible the suspect could strike again. "Well, absolutely, absolutely," he said. "I mean, you know, criminal minds are criminal minds.""
"We believe we know why he did this, and we believe that it was targeted, but we can’t — we’re not 100% sure of that, and so it’d be silly to tell people, 'Yeah, don’t worry about it. You’re not his target.' No, you could be," he said.
I'm sorry: You could be the target of this kidnapper? The suspect could strike again? We know why he did this?
I sure hope this is a planned strategy, because this is bananas. This does not make anyone feel safe. Do they think the motive was personal? or money driven? if the suspect strikes again is he/they looking for an elderly woman? a relative of a famous person? a fomer employer? (like if it was a household/lanscape help/worker person). a person who lives in tuscon? Or anywhere in the U.S.? Any age? Any sex?
The sheriff is saying VERY inflammatory things and providing no information at all.
Reminder that Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos has an annual department budget of over 170 million dollars! This is why so many Americans want to defund the police. They hoover up most of the tax revenue and provide nothing in return.
NY Post has busted this welfare king sheriff driving around town in a $100K convertible sports car. Seems to be at the gym more than at work. How many pensions is this old fart already collecting?
https://nypost.com/2026/03/18/us-news/nancy-guthrie-sheriff-chris-nanos-logging-short-days-in-office-as-case-languishes/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Soooo, that sheriff gave an interview today and all I can say is what the hell is going on.
https://www.today.com/news/nancy-guthrie-update-latest-sheriff-interview-today-rcna263320
Some highlights:
"Kreutz [NBC reporter] asked Nanos [sheriff] if it's possible the suspect could strike again. "Well, absolutely, absolutely," he said. "I mean, you know, criminal minds are criminal minds.""
"We believe we know why he did this, and we believe that it was targeted, but we can’t — we’re not 100% sure of that, and so it’d be silly to tell people, 'Yeah, don’t worry about it. You’re not his target.' No, you could be," he said.
I'm sorry: You could be the target of this kidnapper? The suspect could strike again? We know why he did this?
I sure hope this is a planned strategy, because this is bananas. This does not make anyone feel safe. Do they think the motive was personal? or money driven? if the suspect strikes again is he/they looking for an elderly woman? a relative of a famous person? a fomer employer? (like if it was a household/lanscape help/worker person). a person who lives in tuscon? Or anywhere in the U.S.? Any age? Any sex?
The sheriff is saying VERY inflammatory things and providing no information at all.
Reminder that Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos has an annual department budget of over 170 million dollars! This is why so many Americans want to defund the police. They hoover up most of the tax revenue and provide nothing in return.
Anonymous wrote:I might be late to the game, but can anyone confirm for me if all of the ransom notes received shortly after the investigation began are now considered fake??
Like the ones that TMZ’s Harvey Levin discussed in those lengthy videos?
Thx!
Anonymous wrote:Thinking back to the Moscow Murders, how long did it take for an arrest to be made? Was there a similar level of silence while they were working the case?