Anonymous wrote:
Presidential appointees who are Senate confirmed are also given the title "The Honorable."
But Jared was not Senate confirmed, IIRC. He was just an unpaid Presidential advisor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What would be the point of seizing phones now? Wouldn’t anyone with half a brain have wiped that a long time ago?
They've seized a bunch of them. Every message has at least two people on it. Find a message on one and not the other, you know that someone deleted. And deleting is obstruction when the message in question is evidence of criming.
People are COMMUNICATING!! OMG.
Does anyone here actually think that seizing all these phones is a good idea? What’s next? Round them all up and put them in jail for ‘conspiring against Democrats?’.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That golf course gathering is odd. Could it be he's instructing his employees how he wishes them to upgrade the course?
Not everything he does is sinister. But it looks strange. All those men riding in golf carts.
Men riding in golf carts on a golf course! How very odd![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What would be the point of seizing phones now? Wouldn’t anyone with half a brain have wiped that a long time ago?
They've seized a bunch of them. Every message has at least two people on it. Find a message on one and not the other, you know that someone deleted. And deleting is obstruction when the message in question is evidence of criming.
People are COMMUNICATING!! OMG.
Does anyone here actually think that seizing all these phones is a good idea? What’s next? Round them all up and put them in jail for ‘conspiring against Democrats?’.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What would be the point of seizing phones now? Wouldn’t anyone with half a brain have wiped that a long time ago?
They've seized a bunch of them. Every message has at least two people on it. Find a message on one and not the other, you know that someone deleted. And deleting is obstruction when the message in question is evidence of criming.
People are COMMUNICATING!! OMG.
Does anyone here actually think that seizing all these phones is a good idea? What’s next? Round them all up and put them in jail for ‘conspiring against Democrats?’.
Anonymous wrote:That golf course gathering is odd. Could it be he's instructing his employees how he wishes them to upgrade the course?
Not everything he does is sinister. But it looks strange. All those men riding in golf carts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What would be the point of seizing phones now? Wouldn’t anyone with half a brain have wiped that a long time ago?
They've seized a bunch of them. Every message has at least two people on it. Find a message on one and not the other, you know that someone deleted. And deleting is obstruction when the message in question is evidence of criming.
Anonymous wrote:That golf course gathering is odd. Could it be he's instructing his employees how he wishes them to upgrade the course?
Not everything he does is sinister. But it looks strange. All those men riding in golf carts.
Anonymous wrote:What would be the point of seizing phones now? Wouldn’t anyone with half a brain have wiped that a long time ago?