Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The investigation is seriously lagging.
An arrest should have been made by now.
They don't have a suspect. There will never be an arrest.
The local police botched this from the beginning and it's really sad. Almost no one is abducted today without a trace; especially when there's camera footage. And they are still "discovering" photos 6 weeks later? WTH? Police also let a pizza delivery guy enter the crime scene in the 1st days of the investigation. Total ineptitude. Savannah should hire a private investigator.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Soooo, that sheriff gave an interview today and all I can say is what the hell is going on.
https://www.today.com/news/nancy-guthrie-update-latest-sheriff-interview-today-rcna263320
Some highlights:
"Kreutz [NBC reporter] asked Nanos [sheriff] if it's possible the suspect could strike again. "Well, absolutely, absolutely," he said. "I mean, you know, criminal minds are criminal minds.""
"We believe we know why he did this, and we believe that it was targeted, but we can’t — we’re not 100% sure of that, and so it’d be silly to tell people, 'Yeah, don’t worry about it. You’re not his target.' No, you could be," he said.
I'm sorry: You could be the target of this kidnapper? The suspect could strike again? We know why he did this?
I sure hope this is a planned strategy, because this is bananas. This does not make anyone feel safe. Do they think the motive was personal? or money driven? if the suspect strikes again is he/they looking for an elderly woman? a relative of a famous person? a fomer employer? (like if it was a household/lanscape help/worker person). a person who lives in tuscon? Or anywhere in the U.S.? Any age? Any sex?
The sheriff is saying VERY inflammatory things and providing no information at all.
Reminder that Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos has an annual department budget of over 170 million dollars! This is why so many Americans want to defund the police. They hoover up most of the tax revenue and provide nothing in return.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The investigation is seriously lagging.
An arrest should have been made by now.
They don't have a suspect. There will never be an arrest.
Well, I mean, there could be one in thirty years when they find DNA or someone confesses.
Yep, I would think it would almost have to be a situation where they arrest someone for a similar crime and they confess to this one or are tied back to it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The investigation is seriously lagging.
An arrest should have been made by now.
They don't have a suspect. There will never be an arrest.
Well, I mean, there could be one in thirty years when they find DNA or someone confesses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The investigation is seriously lagging.
An arrest should have been made by now.
They don't have a suspect. There will never be an arrest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Soooo, that sheriff gave an interview today and all I can say is what the hell is going on.
https://www.today.com/news/nancy-guthrie-update-latest-sheriff-interview-today-rcna263320
Some highlights:
"Kreutz [NBC reporter] asked Nanos [sheriff] if it's possible the suspect could strike again. "Well, absolutely, absolutely," he said. "I mean, you know, criminal minds are criminal minds.""
"We believe we know why he did this, and we believe that it was targeted, but we can’t — we’re not 100% sure of that, and so it’d be silly to tell people, 'Yeah, don’t worry about it. You’re not his target.' No, you could be," he said.
I'm sorry: You could be the target of this kidnapper? The suspect could strike again? We know why he did this?
I sure hope this is a planned strategy, because this is bananas. This does not make anyone feel safe. Do they think the motive was personal? or money driven? if the suspect strikes again is he/they looking for an elderly woman? a relative of a famous person? a fomer employer? (like if it was a household/lanscape help/worker person). a person who lives in tuscon? Or anywhere in the U.S.? Any age? Any sex?
The sheriff is saying VERY inflammatory things and providing no information at all.
Reminder that Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos has an annual department budget of over 170 million dollars! This is why so many Americans want to defund the police. They hoover up most of the tax revenue and provide nothing in return.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The investigation is seriously lagging.
An arrest should have been made by now.
They don't have a suspect. There will never be an arrest.
Anonymous wrote:Soooo, that sheriff gave an interview today and all I can say is what the hell is going on.
https://www.today.com/news/nancy-guthrie-update-latest-sheriff-interview-today-rcna263320
Some highlights:
"Kreutz [NBC reporter] asked Nanos [sheriff] if it's possible the suspect could strike again. "Well, absolutely, absolutely," he said. "I mean, you know, criminal minds are criminal minds.""
"We believe we know why he did this, and we believe that it was targeted, but we can’t — we’re not 100% sure of that, and so it’d be silly to tell people, 'Yeah, don’t worry about it. You’re not his target.' No, you could be," he said.
I'm sorry: You could be the target of this kidnapper? The suspect could strike again? We know why he did this?
I sure hope this is a planned strategy, because this is bananas. This does not make anyone feel safe. Do they think the motive was personal? or money driven? if the suspect strikes again is he/they looking for an elderly woman? a relative of a famous person? a fomer employer? (like if it was a household/lanscape help/worker person). a person who lives in tuscon? Or anywhere in the U.S.? Any age? Any sex?
The sheriff is saying VERY inflammatory things and providing no information at all.
Anonymous wrote:The investigation is seriously lagging.
An arrest should have been made by now.
Anonymous wrote:What if she’s found on Easter alive??
Anonymous wrote:Soooo, that sheriff gave an interview today and all I can say is what the hell is going on.
https://www.today.com/news/nancy-guthrie-update-latest-sheriff-interview-today-rcna263320
Some highlights:
"Kreutz [NBC reporter] asked Nanos [sheriff] if it's possible the suspect could strike again. "Well, absolutely, absolutely," he said. "I mean, you know, criminal minds are criminal minds.""
"We believe we know why he did this, and we believe that it was targeted, but we can’t — we’re not 100% sure of that, and so it’d be silly to tell people, 'Yeah, don’t worry about it. You’re not his target.' No, you could be," he said.
I'm sorry: You could be the target of this kidnapper? The suspect could strike again? We know why he did this?
I sure hope this is a planned strategy, because this is bananas. This does not make anyone feel safe. Do they think the motive was personal? or money driven? if the suspect strikes again is he/they looking for an elderly woman? a relative of a famous person? a fomer employer? (like if it was a household/lanscape help/worker person). a person who lives in tuscon? Or anywhere in the U.S.? Any age? Any sex?
The sheriff is saying VERY inflammatory things and providing no information at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s all very sad but she has lived a long life. Hopefully the family is able to move on sooner rather than later
How can they move on without closure?
They don't really have a choice.
Plenty of people don’t really move on. Even when a loved one dies of natural causes, some people just get stuck in complicated grief. Not proud of this, but I consume a lot of true crime, and sometimes it is so clear people have not moved on. Their lives are all about that murdered or missing person. Did you watch the documentary about Amy Bradley? Her family has in no sense moved on.
It’s also probably terrifying for Savannah because who knows if this person is going to attack her or other family members. It might not be likely, but I’m sure if this happened to me that idea would be in the back of my head all of the time.