Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How have 2010 girls fared in all the changes? Did they lose any starters back to SYC?
Or pick up any starters from Brave? Net-net, have they emerged stronger or weaker?
Definetly have lost some players already, not sure if all of them are considered "starters" to Arlington and SYC. Those players are theoreticaly replaced with Brave's best players so net zero right now maybe net positive if you are a Brave homer. The big elephant in the room is there are girls going to DC privates for HS who may also be good enough to challenge for a starting spot at Bethesda come May. If this happens then the new FVU would certainly be net - negative.
Why would a Union starting player leave for Bethesda? 2010G Union folks on DCUM “Moving to Northern VA” seem to think that’s the top 2010G team in DMV (which isn’t crazy when you look at results), and that Union is the best club for girls college placement (which also isn’t crazy when you look at results).
Anonymous wrote:RU in Richmond is intentionally trying to hurt ECNL programs in NOVA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How have 2010 girls fared in all the changes? Did they lose any starters back to SYC?
Or pick up any starters from Brave? Net-net, have they emerged stronger or weaker?
Definetly have lost some players already, not sure if all of them are considered "starters" to Arlington and SYC. Those players are theoreticaly replaced with Brave's best players so net zero right now maybe net positive if you are a Brave homer. The big elephant in the room is there are girls going to DC privates for HS who may also be good enough to challenge for a starting spot at Bethesda come May. If this happens then the new FVU would certainly be net - negative.
Why would a Union starting player leave for Bethesda? 2010G Union folks on DCUM “Moving to Northern VA” seem to think that’s the top 2010G team in DMV (which isn’t crazy when you look at results), and that Union is the best club for girls college placement (which also isn’t crazy when you look at results).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How have 2010 girls fared in all the changes? Did they lose any starters back to SYC?
Or pick up any starters from Brave? Net-net, have they emerged stronger or weaker?
Definetly have lost some players already, not sure if all of them are considered "starters" to Arlington and SYC. Those players are theoreticaly replaced with Brave's best players so net zero right now maybe net positive if you are a Brave homer. The big elephant in the room is there are girls going to DC privates for HS who may also be good enough to challenge for a starting spot at Bethesda come May. If this happens then the new FVU would certainly be net - negative.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How have 2010 girls fared in all the changes? Did they lose any starters back to SYC?
Or pick up any starters from Brave? Net-net, have they emerged stronger or weaker?
Anonymous wrote:How have 2010 girls fared in all the changes? Did they lose any starters back to SYC?
Anonymous wrote:Can we please get to 250?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is a trapped player?
Basically a trap player is born in the same birth year as the kids that are a grade older on a team (think Oct.-Dec. birthdays since cutoff for school, at least in VA, is Sept. 30). So those players are "trapped" and get to repeat their U19 season twice - once as a Junior playing with mostly seniors in HS, then as actual seniors playing with majority Juniors. I have two trap players in club soccer. and really wish they had never moved to the birth year rule and just stuck with grade levels.
Can one play U19 season twice? I guess the leagues don’t care about age at that point?
Age is why they can play twice. It's U19, not U18.