Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain what/who is RIO?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a dog and pony show. The Northern Westfield elementary schools have to go or they will be cutoff from Westfield. It really comes down to if they pull South Lakes elementary schools or Chantilly elementary schools to go along with the Westfield ones.
The next issue is then back filling Westfield.
Thought moving part of Westfield and Chantilly into Skyview was pretty much guaranteed and the bigger questions were whether they’d move part of South Lakes or Oakton into Skyview as well and then move parts of Chantilly and/or Centreville to back fill Westfield.
It’s seemed like most of the back and forth over the past several months has been whether Fox Mill or Crossfield made more sense to move into Skyview.
Problem:
Meren won't let Fox Mill move.
RIO seems to have some clout. But, Crossfield should move.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a dog and pony show. The Northern Westfield elementary schools have to go or they will be cutoff from Westfield. It really comes down to if they pull South Lakes elementary schools or Chantilly elementary schools to go along with the Westfield ones.
The next issue is then back filling Westfield.
Thought moving part of Westfield and Chantilly into Skyview was pretty much guaranteed and the bigger questions were whether they’d move part of South Lakes or Oakton into Skyview as well and then move parts of Chantilly and/or Centreville to back fill Westfield.
It’s seemed like most of the back and forth over the past several months has been whether Fox Mill or Crossfield made more sense to move into Skyview.
Problem:
Meren won't let Fox Mill move.
RIO seems to have some clout. But, Crossfield should move.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a dog and pony show. The Northern Westfield elementary schools have to go or they will be cutoff from Westfield. It really comes down to if they pull South Lakes elementary schools or Chantilly elementary schools to go along with the Westfield ones.
The next issue is then back filling Westfield.
Thought moving part of Westfield and Chantilly into Skyview was pretty much guaranteed and the bigger questions were whether they’d move part of South Lakes or Oakton into Skyview as well and then move parts of Chantilly and/or Centreville to back fill Westfield.
It’s seemed like most of the back and forth over the past several months has been whether Fox Mill or Crossfield made more sense to move into Skyview.
Problem:
Meren won't let Fox Mill move.
RIO seems to have some clout. But, Crossfield should move.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a dog and pony show. The Northern Westfield elementary schools have to go or they will be cutoff from Westfield. It really comes down to if they pull South Lakes elementary schools or Chantilly elementary schools to go along with the Westfield ones.
The next issue is then back filling Westfield.
Thought moving part of Westfield and Chantilly into Skyview was pretty much guaranteed and the bigger questions were whether they’d move part of South Lakes or Oakton into Skyview as well and then move parts of Chantilly and/or Centreville to back fill Westfield.
It’s seemed like most of the back and forth over the past several months has been whether Fox Mill or Crossfield made more sense to move into Skyview.
Problem:
Meren won't let Fox Mill move.
RIO seems to have some clout. But, Crossfield should move.
Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain what/who is RIO?
Anonymous wrote:If the school board can move kids to a high school other than Skyview due to the need for backfilling… What if some Oakton kids get moved to South Lakes or somewhere else? That would take away the argument that they shouldn’t be forced to go to a new school with uncertain programming. They would have to come up with a different argument. We all know it’s about staying at Oakton at all costs, but I don’t know how compelling that argument is when clearly some changes are going to have to be made, and most people want to stay where they are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a dog and pony show. The Northern Westfield elementary schools have to go or they will be cutoff from Westfield. It really comes down to if they pull South Lakes elementary schools or Chantilly elementary schools to go along with the Westfield ones.
The next issue is then back filling Westfield.
Thought moving part of Westfield and Chantilly into Skyview was pretty much guaranteed and the bigger questions were whether they’d move part of South Lakes or Oakton into Skyview as well and then move parts of Chantilly and/or Centreville to back fill Westfield.
It’s seemed like most of the back and forth over the past several months has been whether Fox Mill or Crossfield made more sense to move into Skyview.
Anonymous wrote:Given that they just wrapped up a boundary study, can they really pull anyone into Westfield for next year? Wouldn’t it have to go through the process with community input, etc.? I don’t know the specific language of their policy. I know they said something about the regular boundary change procedures not needing to be followed in the event that a new school has opened. But does that include changes made for the purpose of backfilling a school that has empty seats due to a new school opening, or just the changes where kids are moved to the new school?
Anonymous wrote:This is a dog and pony show. The Northern Westfield elementary schools have to go or they will be cutoff from Westfield. It really comes down to if they pull South Lakes elementary schools or Chantilly elementary schools to go along with the Westfield ones.
The next issue is then back filling Westfield.
Anonymous wrote:If the school board can move kids to a high school other than Skyview due to the need for backfilling… What if some Oakton kids get moved to South Lakes or somewhere else? That would take away the argument that they shouldn’t be forced to go to a new school with uncertain programming. They would have to come up with a different argument. We all know it’s about staying at Oakton at all costs, but I don’t know how compelling that argument is when clearly some changes are going to have to be made, and most people want to stay where they are.