Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Israel is burning right now.
It’s crazy that they are arresting journalists and banning Israelis from fleeing the country
There’s a ton of propaganda online where people are pretending that they’re sitting outside drinking coffee and nothing is happening in Israel.
Even CNN reported on Israel’s censorship
https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/06/media/israel-iran-war-media-censor-journalism
You would think they would want to censor the Gaza war but they proudly want to see the death and destruction they cause even if it’s their own reputation at risk. They love to stream music to the sound of idf soldiers blowing up buildings. But when their cities are getting blown up, no. A heavy military censor and photography blackout must be enforced
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Israel is burning right now.
It’s crazy that they are arresting journalists and banning Israelis from fleeing the country
There’s a ton of propaganda online where people are pretending that they’re sitting outside drinking coffee and nothing is happening in Israel.
Anonymous wrote:Israel is burning right now.
It’s crazy that they are arresting journalists and banning Israelis from fleeing the country
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Given the fact that we now know that building had until recently been an IRGC building and part of the Minab IRGC naval base it's entirely plausible it was converted to a school for IRGC kids. But wouldn't it have made a lot more sense to blow up their IRGC dads? Seems to me far more likely it was a case of outdated intel. They expected to be bombing an IRGC naval command facility.
+1
This narrative is so pathetic. The school wasn't struck intentionally. JFC.
Intelligence should be able to confirm a building's use before you drop million dollar bombs on it.
If both countries are going to hide military equipment in civilian areas then neither can complain when there are civilian casualties. It’s terrible for civilians, but they should blame their own governments. Of course, once one side does it there is going to be a call for retribution.
Civilian casualties when targeting personnel? It would happen here, too. Look at the targets around DC and the number of civilians there. That said, I think that certain parties in the ME do it on purpose.
How were they hiding military equipment in a civilian area. This was a school near a military base. The US has plenty of schools on and near military bases too. Because soldiers have kids who have to go to school. That doesn’t make the kids or schools legitimate targets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Given the fact that we now know that building had until recently been an IRGC building and part of the Minab IRGC naval base it's entirely plausible it was converted to a school for IRGC kids. But wouldn't it have made a lot more sense to blow up their IRGC dads? Seems to me far more likely it was a case of outdated intel. They expected to be bombing an IRGC naval command facility.
+1
This narrative is so pathetic. The school wasn't struck intentionally. JFC.
Intelligence should be able to confirm a building's use before you drop million dollar bombs on it.
If both countries are going to hide military equipment in civilian areas then neither can complain when there are civilian casualties. It’s terrible for civilians, but they should blame their own governments. Of course, once one side does it there is going to be a call for retribution.
Civilian casualties when targeting personnel? It would happen here, too. Look at the targets around DC and the number of civilians there. That said, I think that certain parties in the ME do it on purpose.
Only stupid incompetent people would target civilian areas when you are trying to encourage the civilian population to “rise up and take back their country”. Look at the success the Israelis have had in Gaza and every other place with this type of policy. It’s a total failure. It leads to endless wars, suicide bombers and loss of support.
You've already said this 47 times. You're boring and quite obviously nobody is jumping on board with you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Given the fact that we now know that building had until recently been an IRGC building and part of the Minab IRGC naval base it's entirely plausible it was converted to a school for IRGC kids. But wouldn't it have made a lot more sense to blow up their IRGC dads? Seems to me far more likely it was a case of outdated intel. They expected to be bombing an IRGC naval command facility.
+1
This narrative is so pathetic. The school wasn't struck intentionally. JFC.
Intelligence should be able to confirm a building's use before you drop million dollar bombs on it.
If both countries are going to hide military equipment in civilian areas then neither can complain when there are civilian casualties. It’s terrible for civilians, but they should blame their own governments. Of course, once one side does it there is going to be a call for retribution.
Civilian casualties when targeting personnel? It would happen here, too. Look at the targets around DC and the number of civilians there. That said, I think that certain parties in the ME do it on purpose.
Only stupid incompetent people would target civilian areas when you are trying to encourage the civilian population to “rise up and take back their country”. Look at the success the Israelis have had in Gaza and every other place with this type of policy. It’s a total failure. It leads to endless wars, suicide bombers and loss of support.
You've already said this 47 times. You're boring and quite obviously nobody is jumping on board with you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Given the fact that we now know that building had until recently been an IRGC building and part of the Minab IRGC naval base it's entirely plausible it was converted to a school for IRGC kids. But wouldn't it have made a lot more sense to blow up their IRGC dads? Seems to me far more likely it was a case of outdated intel. They expected to be bombing an IRGC naval command facility.
+1
This narrative is so pathetic. The school wasn't struck intentionally. JFC.
Intelligence should be able to confirm a building's use before you drop million dollar bombs on it.
If both countries are going to hide military equipment in civilian areas then neither can complain when there are civilian casualties. It’s terrible for civilians, but they should blame their own governments. Of course, once one side does it there is going to be a call for retribution.
Civilian casualties when targeting personnel? It would happen here, too. Look at the targets around DC and the number of civilians there. That said, I think that certain parties in the ME do it on purpose.
How were they hiding military equipment in a civilian area. This was a school near a military base. The US has plenty of schools on and near military bases too. Because soldiers have kids who have to go to school. That doesn’t make the kids or schools legitimate targets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Given the fact that we now know that building had until recently been an IRGC building and part of the Minab IRGC naval base it's entirely plausible it was converted to a school for IRGC kids. But wouldn't it have made a lot more sense to blow up their IRGC dads? Seems to me far more likely it was a case of outdated intel. They expected to be bombing an IRGC naval command facility.
+1
This narrative is so pathetic. The school wasn't struck intentionally. JFC.
Intelligence should be able to confirm a building's use before you drop million dollar bombs on it.
If both countries are going to hide military equipment in civilian areas then neither can complain when there are civilian casualties. It’s terrible for civilians, but they should blame their own governments. Of course, once one side does it there is going to be a call for retribution.
Civilian casualties when targeting personnel? It would happen here, too. Look at the targets around DC and the number of civilians there. That said, I think that certain parties in the ME do it on purpose.
Only stupid incompetent people would target civilian areas when you are trying to encourage the civilian population to “rise up and take back their country”. Look at the success the Israelis have had in Gaza and every other place with this type of policy. It’s a total failure. It leads to endless wars, suicide bombers and loss of support.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Given the fact that we now know that building had until recently been an IRGC building and part of the Minab IRGC naval base it's entirely plausible it was converted to a school for IRGC kids. But wouldn't it have made a lot more sense to blow up their IRGC dads? Seems to me far more likely it was a case of outdated intel. They expected to be bombing an IRGC naval command facility.
+1
This narrative is so pathetic. The school wasn't struck intentionally. JFC.
Intelligence should be able to confirm a building's use before you drop million dollar bombs on it.
If both countries are going to hide military equipment in civilian areas then neither can complain when there are civilian casualties. It’s terrible for civilians, but they should blame their own governments. Of course, once one side does it there is going to be a call for retribution.
Civilian casualties when targeting personnel? It would happen here, too. Look at the targets around DC and the number of civilians there. That said, I think that certain parties in the ME do it on purpose.
So maybe hit the target in early morning or late at night when the elementary age school children aren’t there? Or is that tactic beyond these cruel morons?
I’m not justifying it. I’m saying that both sides in this war play that game.
They had every opportunity in the world to hit any military target there and avoid murdering the school children. But the US/Israel are waging a terror campaign.
Where are all those "Iranians" dancing in the streets in America. I guess they don't care about Iranian kids being killed because they're not actually Iranians (anymore).
Same as those "Venezuelans" dancing a few months ago. I guess they don't care about recent diplomatic ties or anything.
Same goes for the "Cubans" who care so much that the US is starving the Cuban populace.
Fake ass independence whiners.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Given the fact that we now know that building had until recently been an IRGC building and part of the Minab IRGC naval base it's entirely plausible it was converted to a school for IRGC kids. But wouldn't it have made a lot more sense to blow up their IRGC dads? Seems to me far more likely it was a case of outdated intel. They expected to be bombing an IRGC naval command facility.
+1
This narrative is so pathetic. The school wasn't struck intentionally. JFC.
Intelligence should be able to confirm a building's use before you drop million dollar bombs on it.
If both countries are going to hide military equipment in civilian areas then neither can complain when there are civilian casualties. It’s terrible for civilians, but they should blame their own governments. Of course, once one side does it there is going to be a call for retribution.
Civilian casualties when targeting personnel? It would happen here, too. Look at the targets around DC and the number of civilians there. That said, I think that certain parties in the ME do it on purpose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Given the fact that we now know that building had until recently been an IRGC building and part of the Minab IRGC naval base it's entirely plausible it was converted to a school for IRGC kids. But wouldn't it have made a lot more sense to blow up their IRGC dads? Seems to me far more likely it was a case of outdated intel. They expected to be bombing an IRGC naval command facility.
+1
This narrative is so pathetic. The school wasn't struck intentionally. JFC.
Intelligence should be able to confirm a building's use before you drop million dollar bombs on it.
If both countries are going to hide military equipment in civilian areas then neither can complain when there are civilian casualties. It’s terrible for civilians, but they should blame their own governments. Of course, once one side does it there is going to be a call for retribution.
Civilian casualties when targeting personnel? It would happen here, too. Look at the targets around DC and the number of civilians there. That said, I think that certain parties in the ME do it on purpose.
So maybe hit the target in early morning or late at night when the elementary age school children aren’t there? Or is that tactic beyond these cruel morons?
I’m not justifying it. I’m saying that both sides in this war play that game.
They had every opportunity in the world to hit any military target there and avoid murdering the school children. But the US/Israel are waging a terror campaign.
Where are all those "Iranians" dancing in the streets in America. I guess they don't care about Iranian kids being killed because they're not actually Iranians (anymore).
Same as those "Venezuelans" dancing a few months ago. I guess they don't care about recent diplomatic ties or anything.
Same goes for the "Cubans" who care so much that the US is starving the Cuban populace.
Fake ass independence whiners.