Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But I have a serious problem with justifying correcting today's problems because of what happened 400 years ago.
Why do you repeatedly refer to “400 years ago”? Seems like an attempt to falsely create distance from the very recent atrocities in our country.
Because that's the justification for "reparations," in the article. The justification is that BECAUSE this has been going on for 400 years, black people are entitled to something. That's very different from saying George Floyd's family should be compensated or we should reform the police today.
Saying "because of what happened 400 years ago" is very different than "because of what has happened for the last 400 years" - and given how precise you are with language it appears that you are intentionally distancing the atrocities.
Over what time period do you think the US has systematically oppressed black people and done harm?
How old do you think this country is?
Hint: the United States declared independence in 1776.
Black people have been transported and oppressed in the Americas for longer than 400 years, but the transatlantic slave trade began in earnest when the first human cargo arrived in Virginia in 1619.
https://time.com/5653369/august-1619-jamestown-history/
Slavery started in Africa with......... you guessed it......... Africans.
That doesn’t mean here in US they have been pushed down relentless.
How do fix that? Reparations ain’t it. Nobody (including myself) is going to give up their job, status, wealth, pay more taxes, or any other measure you can come up with to fix what has been happening. Why should I!? I’m an immigrant who has worked hard to have what I have.
They HAVE been pushed down relentlessly over the last 400 years.
Settle down immigrant guy. Nobody is coming for your stuff, and this country is full of people who work hard, nothing special about that. If reparations ever come to pass, and I hope the do, they will be a long overdue compensation, not a handout, and probably not nearly enough to right centuries of wrong.
Nothing special about taking advantage of the opportunities that this country affords, I have done my best to take advantage of them, be grateful that you were allowed to, you got lucky. There is a long line of lucky ducks who came before you, and a long line that will come after you. And an even longer line who will never get to come, although I say keep em coming, more people to pay for my social security, medicare and when the time comes, my reparations.
When you got here, or or you got here, doesn't matter. Put your time in, and one day you too may be able to collect social security, that when all is said and done I will have paid the max into for 35 years. Maybe you have to call the fire department one day, because your house is on fire. Who do you think bought that firetruck you called. That's right my taxes, so your point is silly. If a debt comes due, your hard earned money will be taxed, just like it is every minute of your life, and a tiny infinitesimal portion of your taxes, will go to pay reparations.
And also don't worry about your stuff. I don't want your stuff. I have lots of stuff. I don't want your success (whatever that means) I have that too, same for your wealth, have my own. Your job? Why would I want that? I am retiring soon, so I don't want that either.
Welcome to America, funded by the blood, sweat and tears of generations of people just like yourself, who came to America with a dream to do better. Congrats now get back to work.
So basically you want a tiny bit of money that you don't need for enormous harm you didn't suffer from people who didn't cause it? If that's all it is, I'll send you a $5 check and write "reparations" on it.
Because I got a bit nervous when the rich black guy from BET said he wanted $14 trillion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, the key words are "present problems." Blacks in America today have problems today. So do poor whites. And immigrants. So lets fix what is front of us. We can't fix what is behind us.
Ok, but black people face unique challenges in the US today because of the last 400 years of oppression.
Poor black people have more trauma and barriers than poor white people.
I disagree. They face unique challenges because of today's oppression. Is George Floyd dead because his great grandfather was a slave, or because a cop put a knee on his neck? Is it harder for a black person to buy a house today because of slavery or because they can't get a loan?
History may explain why these things happen, but it doesn't cause them. What we do right now causes today's problems. And the solutions are all right now as well.
Well, George Floyd wouldn't even be in Minneapolis if the US hadn't participated in chattel slavery. If he, his father, and grandfather had more opportunities then maybe he wouldn't have been an out-of-work bouncer who was possibly writing a forged check. If the US hadn't allowed white supremacy to flourish for centuries then perhaps the MPD wouldn't have had such a toxic, racist culture and officers like Chauvin would have been kicked out long ago. There are a series of historical atrocities that led to his death.
It's not just slavery - the issue is that the US has allowed white supremacy to go unchecked for centuries. Slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, etc. Those are all manifestations with "residual harm".
Certainly, black people DO face unique challenges in the US today because of the last 400 years of oppression.
If the US hadn't participated in chattel slavery, he'd be in West Africa. Then what?
I'm not arguing with you about the history is. I am arguing about the meaning of it for today and what to do about it.
All of that led to where we are today. It all led to his death. That is the meaning.
I agree. But it doesn't mean he is entitled to amy payment for whatever happened to his grandfather.
It's not just about slavery. He is entitled for his grandfather, father, and himself.
Well at least we are getting to the actual point. No, he is only entitled for himself. If he is,* then Jews are entitled to reparations for 2,000 of opprrssion. Native Americans are entitled to the entire country. And so on.
That sjould say, "if he is entitled to payments for his ancestors, then"
Ok. I agree with you. He’s not entitled for payment FOR his ancestors - just himself. Because he himself does suffer measurable “residual harm” from slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, de facto segregation, etc.
De facto segregation/resegregation only started in Minneapolis in the past 10-20 years.
You've lost sight of the trees for the forest. Pay more attention to today and less to the 1600s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, the key words are "present problems." Blacks in America today have problems today. So do poor whites. And immigrants. So lets fix what is front of us. We can't fix what is behind us.
Ok, but black people face unique challenges in the US today because of the last 400 years of oppression.
Poor black people have more trauma and barriers than poor white people.
I disagree. They face unique challenges because of today's oppression. Is George Floyd dead because his great grandfather was a slave, or because a cop put a knee on his neck? Is it harder for a black person to buy a house today because of slavery or because they can't get a loan?
History may explain why these things happen, but it doesn't cause them. What we do right now causes today's problems. And the solutions are all right now as well.
Well, George Floyd wouldn't even be in Minneapolis if the US hadn't participated in chattel slavery. If he, his father, and grandfather had more opportunities then maybe he wouldn't have been an out-of-work bouncer who was possibly writing a forged check. If the US hadn't allowed white supremacy to flourish for centuries then perhaps the MPD wouldn't have had such a toxic, racist culture and officers like Chauvin would have been kicked out long ago. There are a series of historical atrocities that led to his death.
It's not just slavery - the issue is that the US has allowed white supremacy to go unchecked for centuries. Slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, etc. Those are all manifestations with "residual harm".
Certainly, black people DO face unique challenges in the US today because of the last 400 years of oppression.
If the US hadn't participated in chattel slavery, he'd be in West Africa. Then what?
I'm not arguing with you about the history is. I am arguing about the meaning of it for today and what to do about it.
All of that led to where we are today. It all led to his death. That is the meaning.
I agree. But it doesn't mean he is entitled to amy payment for whatever happened to his grandfather.
It's not just about slavery. He is entitled for his grandfather, father, and himself.
Well at least we are getting to the actual point. No, he is only entitled for himself. If he is,* then Jews are entitled to reparations for 2,000 of opprrssion. Native Americans are entitled to the entire country. And so on.
That sjould say, "if he is entitled to payments for his ancestors, then"
Ok. I agree with you. He’s not entitled for payment FOR his ancestors - just himself. Because he himself does suffer measurable “residual harm” from slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, de facto segregation, etc.
Ok. At least we got that far.![]()
But how do you measure what impact redlining had on his life? Let alone things going further back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, the key words are "present problems." Blacks in America today have problems today. So do poor whites. And immigrants. So lets fix what is front of us. We can't fix what is behind us.
Ok, but black people face unique challenges in the US today because of the last 400 years of oppression.
Poor black people have more trauma and barriers than poor white people.
I disagree. They face unique challenges because of today's oppression. Is George Floyd dead because his great grandfather was a slave, or because a cop put a knee on his neck? Is it harder for a black person to buy a house today because of slavery or because they can't get a loan?
History may explain why these things happen, but it doesn't cause them. What we do right now causes today's problems. And the solutions are all right now as well.
Well, George Floyd wouldn't even be in Minneapolis if the US hadn't participated in chattel slavery. If he, his father, and grandfather had more opportunities then maybe he wouldn't have been an out-of-work bouncer who was possibly writing a forged check. If the US hadn't allowed white supremacy to flourish for centuries then perhaps the MPD wouldn't have had such a toxic, racist culture and officers like Chauvin would have been kicked out long ago. There are a series of historical atrocities that led to his death.
It's not just slavery - the issue is that the US has allowed white supremacy to go unchecked for centuries. Slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, etc. Those are all manifestations with "residual harm".
Certainly, black people DO face unique challenges in the US today because of the last 400 years of oppression.
If the US hadn't participated in chattel slavery, he'd be in West Africa. Then what?
I'm not arguing with you about the history is. I am arguing about the meaning of it for today and what to do about it.
All of that led to where we are today. It all led to his death. That is the meaning.
I agree. But it doesn't mean he is entitled to amy payment for whatever happened to his grandfather.
It's not just about slavery. He is entitled for his grandfather, father, and himself.
Well at least we are getting to the actual point. No, he is only entitled for himself. If he is,* then Jews are entitled to reparations for 2,000 of opprrssion. Native Americans are entitled to the entire country. And so on.
That sjould say, "if he is entitled to payments for his ancestors, then"
Ok. I agree with you. He’s not entitled for payment FOR his ancestors - just himself. Because he himself does suffer measurable “residual harm” from slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, de facto segregation, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the argument would be more persuasive if it relied less on concepts of fairness and inequity and focused more on the case for how it will make the U.S. a happier, more functional place to live.
That’s a great point.
I think it’d ideally be part of a broader program of social reform with the end goals of:
- housing & education integration
- equality in health, economics, education, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fine. If we end every other minority incentive program. Give everyone a million dollars if we can stop the pandering.
That would be a very successful pander. How can I get my own pander payment?
You give up your US citizenship and show a one-way ticket to the country of your choice, and done deal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But I have a serious problem with justifying correcting today's problems because of what happened 400 years ago.
Why do you repeatedly refer to “400 years ago”? Seems like an attempt to falsely create distance from the very recent atrocities in our country.
Because that's the justification for "reparations," in the article. The justification is that BECAUSE this has been going on for 400 years, black people are entitled to something. That's very different from saying George Floyd's family should be compensated or we should reform the police today.
Saying "because of what happened 400 years ago" is very different than "because of what has happened for the last 400 years" - and given how precise you are with language it appears that you are intentionally distancing the atrocities.
Over what time period do you think the US has systematically oppressed black people and done harm?
How old do you think this country is?
Hint: the United States declared independence in 1776.
Black people have been transported and oppressed in the Americas for longer than 400 years, but the transatlantic slave trade began in earnest when the first human cargo arrived in Virginia in 1619.
https://time.com/5653369/august-1619-jamestown-history/
Slavery started in Africa with......... you guessed it......... Africans.
That doesn’t mean here in US they have been pushed down relentless.
How do fix that? Reparations ain’t it. Nobody (including myself) is going to give up their job, status, wealth, pay more taxes, or any other measure you can come up with to fix what has been happening. Why should I!? I’m an immigrant who has worked hard to have what I have.
They HAVE been pushed down relentlessly over the last 400 years.
Settle down immigrant guy. Nobody is coming for your stuff, and this country is full of people who work hard, nothing special about that. If reparations ever come to pass, and I hope the do, they will be a long overdue compensation, not a handout, and probably not nearly enough to right centuries of wrong.
Nothing special about taking advantage of the opportunities that this country affords, I have done my best to take advantage of them, be grateful that you were allowed to, you got lucky. There is a long line of lucky ducks who came before you, and a long line that will come after you. And an even longer line who will never get to come, although I say keep em coming, more people to pay for my social security, medicare and when the time comes, my reparations.
When you got here, or or you got here, doesn't matter. Put your time in, and one day you too may be able to collect social security, that when all is said and done I will have paid the max into for 35 years. Maybe you have to call the fire department one day, because your house is on fire. Who do you think bought that firetruck you called. That's right my taxes, so your point is silly. If a debt comes due, your hard earned money will be taxed, just like it is every minute of your life, and a tiny infinitesimal portion of your taxes, will go to pay reparations.
And also don't worry about your stuff. I don't want your stuff. I have lots of stuff. I don't want your success (whatever that means) I have that too, same for your wealth, have my own. Your job? Why would I want that? I am retiring soon, so I don't want that either.
Welcome to America, funded by the blood, sweat and tears of generations of people just like yourself, who came to America with a dream to do better. Congrats now get back to work.
Anonymous wrote:I don't have the time or inclination to read through all 23 pages of this, so let me cut to the chase on OP's subject line:
Sorry, but no.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, the key words are "present problems." Blacks in America today have problems today. So do poor whites. And immigrants. So lets fix what is front of us. We can't fix what is behind us.
Ok, but black people face unique challenges in the US today because of the last 400 years of oppression.
Poor black people have more trauma and barriers than poor white people.
I disagree. They face unique challenges because of today's oppression. Is George Floyd dead because his great grandfather was a slave, or because a cop put a knee on his neck? Is it harder for a black person to buy a house today because of slavery or because they can't get a loan?
History may explain why these things happen, but it doesn't cause them. What we do right now causes today's problems. And the solutions are all right now as well.
Well, George Floyd wouldn't even be in Minneapolis if the US hadn't participated in chattel slavery. If he, his father, and grandfather had more opportunities then maybe he wouldn't have been an out-of-work bouncer who was possibly writing a forged check. If the US hadn't allowed white supremacy to flourish for centuries then perhaps the MPD wouldn't have had such a toxic, racist culture and officers like Chauvin would have been kicked out long ago. There are a series of historical atrocities that led to his death.
It's not just slavery - the issue is that the US has allowed white supremacy to go unchecked for centuries. Slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, etc. Those are all manifestations with "residual harm".
Certainly, black people DO face unique challenges in the US today because of the last 400 years of oppression.
If the US hadn't participated in chattel slavery, he'd be in West Africa. Then what?
I'm not arguing with you about the history is. I am arguing about the meaning of it for today and what to do about it.
All of that led to where we are today. It all led to his death. That is the meaning.
I agree. But it doesn't mean he is entitled to amy payment for whatever happened to his grandfather.
It's not just about slavery. He is entitled for his grandfather, father, and himself.
Well at least we are getting to the actual point. No, he is only entitled for himself. If he is,* then Jews are entitled to reparations for 2,000 of opprrssion. Native Americans are entitled to the entire country. And so on.
That sjould say, "if he is entitled to payments for his ancestors, then"
Ok. I agree with you. He’s not entitled for payment FOR his ancestors - just himself. Because he himself does suffer measurable “residual harm” from slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, de facto segregation, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, the key words are "present problems." Blacks in America today have problems today. So do poor whites. And immigrants. So lets fix what is front of us. We can't fix what is behind us.
Ok, but black people face unique challenges in the US today because of the last 400 years of oppression.
Poor black people have more trauma and barriers than poor white people.
I disagree. They face unique challenges because of today's oppression. Is George Floyd dead because his great grandfather was a slave, or because a cop put a knee on his neck? Is it harder for a black person to buy a house today because of slavery or because they can't get a loan?
History may explain why these things happen, but it doesn't cause them. What we do right now causes today's problems. And the solutions are all right now as well.
Well, George Floyd wouldn't even be in Minneapolis if the US hadn't participated in chattel slavery. If he, his father, and grandfather had more opportunities then maybe he wouldn't have been an out-of-work bouncer who was possibly writing a forged check. If the US hadn't allowed white supremacy to flourish for centuries then perhaps the MPD wouldn't have had such a toxic, racist culture and officers like Chauvin would have been kicked out long ago. There are a series of historical atrocities that led to his death.
It's not just slavery - the issue is that the US has allowed white supremacy to go unchecked for centuries. Slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, etc. Those are all manifestations with "residual harm".
Certainly, black people DO face unique challenges in the US today because of the last 400 years of oppression.
If the US hadn't participated in chattel slavery, he'd be in West Africa. Then what?
I'm not arguing with you about the history is. I am arguing about the meaning of it for today and what to do about it.
All of that led to where we are today. It all led to his death. That is the meaning.
I agree. But it doesn't mean he is entitled to amy payment for whatever happened to his grandfather.
It's not just about slavery. He is entitled for his grandfather, father, and himself.
Well at least we are getting to the actual point. No, he is only entitled for himself. If he is,* then Jews are entitled to reparations for 2,000 of opprrssion. Native Americans are entitled to the entire country. And so on.
That sjould say, "if he is entitled to payments for his ancestors, then"
Ok. I agree with you. He’s not entitled for payment FOR his ancestors - just himself. Because he himself does suffer measurable “residual harm” from slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, de facto segregation, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But I have a serious problem with justifying correcting today's problems because of what happened 400 years ago.
Why do you repeatedly refer to “400 years ago”? Seems like an attempt to falsely create distance from the very recent atrocities in our country.
Because that's the justification for "reparations," in the article. The justification is that BECAUSE this has been going on for 400 years, black people are entitled to something. That's very different from saying George Floyd's family should be compensated or we should reform the police today.
Saying "because of what happened 400 years ago" is very different than "because of what has happened for the last 400 years" - and given how precise you are with language it appears that you are intentionally distancing the atrocities.
Over what time period do you think the US has systematically oppressed black people and done harm?
How old do you think this country is?
Hint: the United States declared independence in 1776.
Black people have been transported and oppressed in the Americas for longer than 400 years, but the transatlantic slave trade began in earnest when the first human cargo arrived in Virginia in 1619.
https://time.com/5653369/august-1619-jamestown-history/
Slavery started in Africa with......... you guessed it......... Africans.
That doesn’t mean here in US they have been pushed down relentless.
How do fix that? Reparations ain’t it. Nobody (including myself) is going to give up their job, status, wealth, pay more taxes, or any other measure you can come up with to fix what has been happening. Why should I!? I’m an immigrant who has worked hard to have what I have.
They HAVE been pushed down relentlessly over the last 400 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, the key words are "present problems." Blacks in America today have problems today. So do poor whites. And immigrants. So lets fix what is front of us. We can't fix what is behind us.
Ok, but black people face unique challenges in the US today because of the last 400 years of oppression.
Poor black people have more trauma and barriers than poor white people.
I disagree. They face unique challenges because of today's oppression. Is George Floyd dead because his great grandfather was a slave, or because a cop put a knee on his neck? Is it harder for a black person to buy a house today because of slavery or because they can't get a loan?
History may explain why these things happen, but it doesn't cause them. What we do right now causes today's problems. And the solutions are all right now as well.
Well, George Floyd wouldn't even be in Minneapolis if the US hadn't participated in chattel slavery. If he, his father, and grandfather had more opportunities then maybe he wouldn't have been an out-of-work bouncer who was possibly writing a forged check. If the US hadn't allowed white supremacy to flourish for centuries then perhaps the MPD wouldn't have had such a toxic, racist culture and officers like Chauvin would have been kicked out long ago. There are a series of historical atrocities that led to his death.
It's not just slavery - the issue is that the US has allowed white supremacy to go unchecked for centuries. Slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, etc. Those are all manifestations with "residual harm".
Certainly, black people DO face unique challenges in the US today because of the last 400 years of oppression.
If the US hadn't participated in chattel slavery, he'd be in West Africa. Then what?
I'm not arguing with you about the history is. I am arguing about the meaning of it for today and what to do about it.
All of that led to where we are today. It all led to his death. That is the meaning.
I agree. But it doesn't mean he is entitled to amy payment for whatever happened to his grandfather.
It's not just about slavery. He is entitled for his grandfather, father, and himself.
Well at least we are getting to the actual point. No, he is only entitled for himself. If he is,* then Jews are entitled to reparations for 2,000 of opprrssion. Native Americans are entitled to the entire country. And so on.
That sjould say, "if he is entitled to payments for his ancestors, then"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the argument would be more persuasive if it relied less on concepts of fairness and inequity and focused more on the case for how it will make the U.S. a happier, more functional place to live.
That’s a great point.
I think it’d ideally be part of a broader program of social reform with the end goals of:
- housing & education integration
- equality in health, economics, education, etc.