Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is probably having a mental breakdown with fear of the pandemic, hence why she got the dog, probably for protection. I had friends in NYC, PTSD is a thing, nonstop ambuolances, the refrigerated morgues on the street.

I mean, she is vile, don’t get me wrong, the gentleman was so measured, but clearly she was unhinged.

He was setting her up for this to happen and wanted his 5 minutes of fame which he got. There was no reason to record her. There was no reason to provoke her. She may have been raped or attacked in the past which caused her to panic. Both were wrong.

Really - that is your takeaway?

Recording someone isn't provocation or threatening.

And he didn't post the recording - so what 5 minutes of fame?

Just admit she was wrong and tried to get a bird watcher shot by the police for asking her to politely LEASH HER DOG.

Yes, it is provoking and setting someone up by recording them. You don't record people without permission.

You don't need permission to record anyone, including police, on public grounds. Shut up.

You lose all credibility when you are trashy.

Oh, well then - case closed! Since PP told you to shut up, then it’s okay for this woman to have made a false report to police in order to have this guy arrested or shot. Phew, thanks for clearing that up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just out of fairness I looked up HIS family also. Activists. So I wonder if he regularly goes to the park with his dog treats and targets women who let their dogs off leash. Yes it’s against the law but we don’t know exactly what happened. If some guy popped out of the bushes with his camera rolling and his story ready I would feel intimidated. I wouldn’t walk my dog off leash in a protected garden for this and other reasons. It invites crazies. He planned it with his dog treats.

just stop, ffs

YOU stop. You are lynching this woman.

Wow...such an interesting choice of words (i'm sure intentional)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just out of fairness I looked up HIS family also. Activists. So I wonder if he regularly goes to the park with his dog treats and targets women who let their dogs off leash. Yes it’s against the law but we don’t know exactly what happened. If some guy popped out of the bushes with his camera rolling and his story ready I would feel intimidated. I wouldn’t walk my dog off leash in a protected garden for this and other reasons. It invites crazies. He planned it with his dog treats.

just stop, ffs

YOU stop. You are lynching this woman.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this Birdwatcher would’ve also approached a burly black man with a pitbull in the park , and record that guy I highly doubt it he saw a target and he took it , he saw an opportunity and he took it . And now we Have this viral Social media storm which does nothing except invite us divide a fractured country during a pandemic we are being destroyed in every single way and a stupid little incident in a park is what we are focused on

Black guy seems like a bit of a Bossy Betty. I wonder what really happened.

What has happened, you racist troll, is very much captured in the video!

It’s nap time dear. You don’t know what happened BEFORE the camera was rolling. Seems staged to me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just out of fairness I looked up HIS family also. Activists. So I wonder if he regularly goes to the park with his dog treats and targets women who let their dogs off leash. Yes it’s against the law but we don’t know exactly what happened. If some guy popped out of the bushes with his camera rolling and his story ready I would feel intimidated. I wouldn’t walk my dog off leash in a protected garden for this and other reasons. It invites crazies. He planned it with his dog treats.

just stop, ffs

YOU stop. You are lynching this woman.

Anonymous wrote:What people are also ignoring:

1) He thought he was the police and could enforce the law. What he should have done is called the police if it was so important.
2) He was luring dogs with treats (like he always does) and vaguely implied he would "do something she didn't like". He used the word "do", not "give", which implied he was using the treat to lure the dog so he could "do" something else to it. Giving treats to dogs is not a threat.
3) He wasn't wearing a mask, she was.
4) He called her a Karen, so in his heart he is likely as racist as she is.
5) He video-taped only her reaction, not his initial words. There's no telling what he said initially, aside from what he says in his Facebook post. It's against the law to record someone in NY without the second person's permission. She could rightfully sue him, not only for illegal wiretapping/recording, but for libel. He has ruined her life.
6) Luring dogs with treats does not solve the leash problem, so it is highly unlikely that he was threatening to give her dog treats. It is more probably that he wanted her to think that he was going to poison her dog, or take her dog.
7) If this was a white male, the media and court of public opinion would be on her side. A white male would have been seen as "mansplaining" the law to her, and threatening to hurt her dog.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just out of fairness I looked up HIS family also. Activists. So I wonder if he regularly goes to the park with his dog treats and targets women who let their dogs off leash. Yes it’s against the law but we don’t know exactly what happened. If some guy popped out of the bushes with his camera rolling and his story ready I would feel intimidated. I wouldn’t walk my dog off leash in a protected garden for this and other reasons. It invites crazies. He planned it with his dog treats.

just stop, ffs

Anonymous wrote:Just out of fairness I looked up HIS family also. Activists. So I wonder if he regularly goes to the park with his dog treats and targets women who let their dogs off leash. Yes it’s against the law but we don’t know exactly what happened. If some guy popped out of the bushes with his camera rolling and his story ready I would feel intimidated. I wouldn’t walk my dog off leash in a protected garden for this and other reasons. It invites crazies. He planned it with his dog treats.

Anonymous wrote:Just out of fairness I looked up HIS family also. Activists. So I wonder if he regularly goes to the park with his dog treats and targets women who let their dogs off leash. Yes it’s against the law but we don’t know exactly what happened. If some guy popped out of the bushes with his camera rolling and his story ready I would feel intimidated. I wouldn’t walk my dog off leash in a protected garden for this and other reasons. It invites crazies. He planned it with his dog treats.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this Birdwatcher would’ve also approached a burly black man with a pitbull in the park , and record that guy I highly doubt it he saw a target and he took it , he saw an opportunity and he took it . And now we Have this viral Social media storm which does nothing except invite us divide a fractured country during a pandemic we are being destroyed in every single way and a stupid little incident in a park is what we are focused on

Black guy seems like a bit of a Bossy Betty. I wonder what really happened.

What has happened, you racist troll, is very much captured in the video!

Anonymous wrote:Just out of fairness I looked up HIS family also. Activists. So I wonder if he regularly goes to the park with his dog treats and targets women who let their dogs off leash. Yes it’s against the law but we don’t know exactly what happened. If some guy popped out of the bushes with his camera rolling and his story ready I would feel intimidated. I wouldn’t walk my dog off leash in a protected garden for this and other reasons. It invites crazies. He planned it with his dog treats.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dog woman definitely seems like she has some form of Munchausen by doggy proxy Syndrome. That Annabel has had way too many incidents in a brief time and she does seem to love the attention she garners from it the woman is clearly nuts but the birdwatching man is also an instigator and an opportunistic idiot

Wow! You got all of that from the short video?

Not PP, but this woman had an Instagram page for her dog (the one she is choking in the video), and the dog seems to have had an unusual number of injuries and near-death experiences. She seems pretty unstable so it wouldn’t surprise me if she was an animal abuser as well. Luckily, she has agreed to surrender the dog back to the adoption place.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She apologized. She admitted she was in the wrong and her statements were unacceptable. Have Tawana Brawley or Crystal Magnum apologized for their nonsense or is only "Karens" who need to do so?

Wow you went way back way back with these two examples. But I will engage none the less. Official "investigations" were conducted and in both cases it was determined that the charges/stories were false and charges were dropped. The charges worked their way through the official processes.

When charges were found to be false, claims were dropped and in both cases damages were assessed and victims compensated for their injury. These women weren't really worthy adversaries anyway, one was a damaged child and the other was a stripper.

Now compare and contrast this incident with the historical ugliness invoked by this woman's actions, she did something that many years ago has gotten many a man/child lynched, see Emmett Till, no due process in these cases. Emmett Till was lynched for whistling at a white woman.

People are rightly incensed by her actions, she called the police on a man who dared to speak to her in a critical way. She was the aggressor, she charged at him with her fingers pointing in his face, pinched and red faced, spewing spittle with each ugly utterance. Her actions could have led to a modern day lynching. Fortunately this man, "was the right kind of black man" just as Rosa Parks was the "right kind of black woman". Once he made his point he walked away, the entire time he video tapped he remained calm in contrast to her crazy racist tirade.

This isn't the first time this lady behaved this way, had the man been in a wheelchair, and had no one been looking, she probably would have knocked him over, a blind man she would have stolen his cane. She chose to exploit an "other's" perceived weakness, in this case, a man with black/brown skin. In the end her racists beliefs are what tripped her up. Intelligence, superiority and gamesmanship are not determined by the color of one's skin. This woman assumed incorrectly that the black face in front of her was the "wrong" kind of black man and she came out of it looking like a crazy racist fool. She will and should pay for her misdeeds. I predict if charges can be filed they will be. I predict she will lose her job and have difficulty finding another one.