Anonymous wrote:PP here: I should add I’m on team Arbery, I only posted the leaked letter because it explains the Georgia laws well.
Anonymous wrote:PP here: I should add I’m on team Arbery, I only posted the leaked letter because it explains the Georgia laws well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6883949-Waycross-Judicial-Circuit-Letter-on-Ahmaud.html
Someone posted the letter filed by the DA on Reddit; looks like the DA attributes the death to a scuffle over the shotgun because the first shot went through Arbery’s hand.
That is very interesting.
People here really need to stop calling everyone a racist who does not agree with them that this was some kind of KKK execution. Many people are just saying they don’t have all the facts or pointing out that Arbery may not be the choirboy some people want him to be. That’s okay. A jury can still find the McMichaels guilty of murder if that’s what they think the facts show. Drug dealers are murdered all the time and they are obviously not the ideal victim, but their killers are still found guilty.
An opinion that Arbery was not simply a jogger is not the same as an opinion that the McMichaels are innocent.
Also regarding the burglary aspect, I think it can turn on whether the home in question can be defined as a “dwelling.” I’m sure there is Georgia case law on that. It’s obviously a fully built home on the outside, just gutted and being renovated on the inside. It is a nuance of the law that could bring felony burglary into play. No, I am not saying the McMichaels witnessed it either. Just saying it could be viewed as a burglary depending on how that word in the statute is interpreted.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6883949-Waycross-Judicial-Circuit-Letter-on-Ahmaud.html
Someone posted the letter filed by the DA on Reddit; looks like the DA attributes the death to a scuffle over the shotgun because the first shot went through Arbery’s hand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The owner doesn’t get to decide. The prosecuting office does. This happens all the time in domestic violence cases for instance. The victim decides they’re back in love and doesn’t want to proceed. Guess what. If you gave a recorded statement we can still go forward.
Everyone is saying this was a trespass but frankly I think it will depend on a jury’s interpretation of the term “dwelling.” Be real here people. This was a fully formed house, just being renovated on the inside. It wasn’t a pile of dirt with a wooden frame. It is conceivable it could be a “dwelling” and thus burglary.
No the owner does. There is a rule ... if there is no victim there is no crime. There is not victim here so there was no crime.
The 3 white supremacists don't know if the owner let somebody in the house under construction. For all they knew they were chasing a friend of the owner, or a worker.
It wasn't trespassing according to the law. Also, this information will be thrown out of court. It's irrelevant.
Anonymous wrote:I always poke around construction sites in my neighborhood- I love seeing the floor plans,etc. No harm in this and it's pretty common.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the record, it’s perfectly possible to believe that the killers were at best reckless, and at worst evil, and in any event deserve a long stretch in prison, without having to buy the full package about the totally-innocent jogger or the fundamentally racist nature of America, both of which, IMO, are wrong.
Well, I think this needs to be put into perspective. These men felt empowered to act the way they did because the law has traditionally protected white men who kill Black men and boys. They almost got away with it! It they hadn't filmed it, or if the video hadn't been leaked, they would never have been arrested and the victim's family would have continued to scream into void without any justice.
When you are a Black man in America, there is no such thing as good enough or innocent enough.
11 year-old Tamir Rice had it coming because he had a plastic gun.
17 year-old Trayvon Martin had it coming because he fought back when followed through his neighborhood by a strange man.
22 year-old John Crawford had it coming because he picked an air rifle off the shelf at Wal Mart and carried it toward the register.
26 year-old Botham Jean had it coming because he might have smoked marijuana in his own home.
....and on and on and on. If we weren't all swimming in a racist soup, then the murderers might have felt a little less empowered to shoot to kill, and they would have come to justice much sooner.
+ 1,000,000
Anonymous wrote:The owner doesn’t get to decide. The prosecuting office does. This happens all the time in domestic violence cases for instance. The victim decides they’re back in love and doesn’t want to proceed. Guess what. If you gave a recorded statement we can still go forward.
Everyone is saying this was a trespass but frankly I think it will depend on a jury’s interpretation of the term “dwelling.” Be real here people. This was a fully formed house, just being renovated on the inside. It wasn’t a pile of dirt with a wooden frame. It is conceivable it could be a “dwelling” and thus burglary.