Anonymous wrote:Tuckahoe should definitely take some of the orphan McKinley units that don’t go to Reed. Tuckahoe already has units from Madison Manor area. Tuckahoe will lose some Overlee units to Reed but maybe not all depending on how boundaries shake out.
Anonymous wrote:I posted this before but allow me to try again: would 'Partner-School Option' have a chance to be successful? Match up one S school with one N school and let families choose or lottery which one to go to and bus both ways. I think two buses would probably do.
Anonymous wrote:I posted this before but allow me to try again: would 'Partner-School Option' have a chance to be successful? Match up one S school with one N school and let families choose or lottery which one to go to and bus both ways. I think two buses would probably do.
Anonymous wrote:Why isn't Reed being considered for an option school instead of McKinley? I don't know the background. Is it really that a deal was made with Westover? What kind of deal? I'm not a McKinley or Tuckahoe parent, so I don't know all the background.
Anonymous wrote:Pre-K is not school specific. It gets moved around where ever there is space. It is never considered as part of the actual capacity
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread sounds like two people talking to each other... What the heck is CB and why would McKinley need to fill over 2k seats? Weird.
I think CB is the principal and 2093 is the number of seats for Reed + Ashlawn + McKinley. If they are all neighborhood schools let us know how you would fill them? I suspect that McK will need all of the PUs through Tuckahoe & Nottingham up to the Discovery Walkzone if you fill Reed/Ashlawn.
Anonymous wrote:This thread sounds like two people talking to each other... What the heck is CB and why would McKinley need to fill over 2k seats? Weird.