Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From Maret's website:
Statement about Maret’s Partnership with DPR and the Jelleff Field
In 2008, the Boys and Girls Club of Washington decided to put Jelleff on the market and was in conversation with Maret about a public-private partnership that would (a) preserve this important recreational resource for the benefit of all D.C. residents; and (b) improve the facilities, which were badly run-down and not designed for maximum utility. The District instead decided to buy the property first, and then look for organizations to assist with managing and operating the field space at Jelleff. In 2009, Maret asked to participate in this process.
When the District purchased the Jelleff site in January 2010, it accepted Maret’s proposal to enter into a 10-year agreement with DPR, with a clear option to extend this partnership for 9 more years.
We are very pleased that the District decided to extend our partnership for another 9 years.
When we first entered into this relationship in 2009, we agreed at our sole expense to construct a new and expanded field, redo the swimming pool, add fencing and lights, for an overall investment of $2.4 million dollars. We have continued to manage the property and ensure its upkeep. In exchange we have preferred permitting for approximately 10% of the operational time in the fall and spring seasons.
With this 9-year extension, we will continue to maintain the field and redo the turf which needs to be replaced as well as improve the fencing and other enhancements to the Jelleff Recreation Center that DPR approves. We truly believe that Jelleff is an asset not only to Maret but to the overall community.
Maret is committed to being a good neighbor and partner, not just with BGCGW and DPR, but with dozens of D.C. organizations. We take it so seriously that “building community” is in Maret’s Mission Statement. We have developed reciprocal relationships which benefit both Maret and our community partners. In fact, both Stoddert Soccer, the Boys and Girls Club and many other community organizations use indoor and outdoor spaces at Maret’s 3000 Cathedral Avenue campus in the late afternoons and on weekends.
https://www.maret.org/athletics/jelleff
Where in the contract is the option to renew, though?
Anonymous wrote:From Maret's website:
Statement about Maret’s Partnership with DPR and the Jelleff Field
In 2008, the Boys and Girls Club of Washington decided to put Jelleff on the market and was in conversation with Maret about a public-private partnership that would (a) preserve this important recreational resource for the benefit of all D.C. residents; and (b) improve the facilities, which were badly run-down and not designed for maximum utility. The District instead decided to buy the property first, and then look for organizations to assist with managing and operating the field space at Jelleff. In 2009, Maret asked to participate in this process.
When the District purchased the Jelleff site in January 2010, it accepted Maret’s proposal to enter into a 10-year agreement with DPR, with a clear option to extend this partnership for 9 more years.
We are very pleased that the District decided to extend our partnership for another 9 years.
When we first entered into this relationship in 2009, we agreed at our sole expense to construct a new and expanded field, redo the swimming pool, add fencing and lights, for an overall investment of $2.4 million dollars. We have continued to manage the property and ensure its upkeep. In exchange we have preferred permitting for approximately 10% of the operational time in the fall and spring seasons.
With this 9-year extension, we will continue to maintain the field and redo the turf which needs to be replaced as well as improve the fencing and other enhancements to the Jelleff Recreation Center that DPR approves. We truly believe that Jelleff is an asset not only to Maret but to the overall community.
Maret is committed to being a good neighbor and partner, not just with BGCGW and DPR, but with dozens of D.C. organizations. We take it so seriously that “building community” is in Maret’s Mission Statement. We have developed reciprocal relationships which benefit both Maret and our community partners. In fact, both Stoddert Soccer, the Boys and Girls Club and many other community organizations use indoor and outdoor spaces at Maret’s 3000 Cathedral Avenue campus in the late afternoons and on weekends.
https://www.maret.org/athletics/jelleff
Anonymous wrote:Maret is committed to being a good neighbor and partner, not just with BGCGW and DPR, but with dozens of D.C. organizations. We take it so seriously that “building community” is in Maret’s Mission Statement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If Maret had not invested the money in the field, you would have nothing today to fight over.
But DC bought the field, so not sure what your point is? I can guarantee that the Jelleff after-care kids did not need the fancy turf.
Anonymous wrote:If Maret had not invested the money in the field, you would have nothing today to fight over.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Talbott says that Maret is aware of the complaints from public school advocates, and so last year agreed to let Hardy use the turf field from 4 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. “on most Wednesdays.”"
Wowie. How isolated and tone deaf can that woman be? It's laughable.
Maret let’s Stoddert soccer use their home field on the weekends.
I don’t know whether there is a right to extend this agreement or not. But before piling on Maret (and we have no connection to the school at all), Remember that Muray parents and the school ponied up substantial money to renovate Jeleff field. This was at a time when DCPS couldn’t buy toilet paper for the schools, DPR couldn’t cut the grass, and Marion Barry didn’t do much more than blow a crack pipe .
Remember, instead, that Maret and DPR made a deal, into which both Maret and DPR put something of value (recall that DC bought the land!)
That deal is expiring. No party is owed anything.
Except that there is an agreement to extend the deal. Just because this very one-sided thread and one-sided Deadspin article keep trading in innuendo and false information that everyone seems so gleeful to absorb, doesn’t mean there isn’t more information to consider.