Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CANADA HAS NO ABORTION RESTRICTIONS, AND FEWER ABORTIONS THAN THE US.

I'm just gonna keep on posting this on every single abortion thread.

Also, every single damn person whinging about "post-birth abortion" (which does not exist) is MORALLY OBLIGATED to advocate for universal access to long-term birth control. If you are not, STFU. Seriously, STFU.

You're really all about the nanny state.
The concept of people being responsible for themselves simply escapes you.

DP.. the concept of letting a woman choose what to do with her own body escapes you. Talk about nanny state.

I'm going to keep posting this -- MANDATORY VASECTOMIES FOR MEN. Almost every baby will be wanted. Reduces teen pregnancies.

If you think it's ok to make a woman carry a baby for whatever reason, then it should be ok to make a man not be able to make a baby at will. I'm sure you would agree, that an abortion is worse than a vasectomy.

Anonymous wrote:CANADA HAS NO ABORTION RESTRICTIONS, AND FEWER ABORTIONS THAN THE US.

I'm just gonna keep on posting this on every single abortion thread.

Also, every single damn person whinging about "post-birth abortion" (which does not exist) is MORALLY OBLIGATED to advocate for universal access to long-term birth control. If you are not, STFU. Seriously, STFU.

You're really all about the nanny state.
The concept of people being responsible for themselves simply escapes you.

CANADA HAS NO ABORTION RESTRICTIONS, AND FEWER ABORTIONS THAN THE US.

I'm just gonna keep on posting this on every single abortion thread.

Also, every single damn person whinging about "post-birth abortion" (which does not exist) is MORALLY OBLIGATED to advocate for universal access to long-term birth control. If you are not, STFU. Seriously, STFU.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who has $15,000.00 for an abortion? That's insane.

Cheaper than 18+ years of food, housing, college, etc.

Or extensive medical bills if the child had a serious health issue.

If you don't want the baby, no one will force you to keep the baby. You know that, don't you?

Well, a woman might not be willing to die in order so her severely deformed child can languish for years unwanted in foster care. We’re not talking about the beautiful, healthy white babies that barren religious people are paying $50k a pop for or the charmingly moderately disabled kids that “enrich their parents lives with so much joy.”

The experts I have heard (OBGYNs, mostly) have said it is more dangerous on a woman's health to undergo a late term abortion than childbirth.

Yeah right, "experts."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who has $15,000.00 for an abortion? That's insane.

Cheaper than 18+ years of food, housing, college, etc.

Or extensive medical bills if the child had a serious health issue.

If you don't want the baby, no one will force you to keep the baby. You know that, don't you?

Well, a woman might not be willing to die in order so her severely deformed child can languish for years unwanted in foster care. We’re not talking about the beautiful, healthy white babies that barren religious people are paying $50k a pop for or the charmingly moderately disabled kids that “enrich their parents lives with so much joy.”

The experts I have heard (OBGYNs, mostly) have said it is more dangerous on a woman's health to undergo a late term abortion than childbirth.

citation?

Anonymous wrote:

The experts I have heard (OBGYNs, mostly) have said it is more dangerous on a woman's health to undergo a late term abortion than childbirth.

It depends on the case/patient

Which is why this is NOT something we should be legislating. Stupidity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who has $15,000.00 for an abortion? That's insane.

Cheaper than 18+ years of food, housing, college, etc.

Or extensive medical bills if the child had a serious health issue.

If you don't want the baby, no one will force you to keep the baby. You know that, don't you?

Well, a woman might not be willing to die in order so her severely deformed child can languish for years unwanted in foster care. We’re not talking about the beautiful, healthy white babies that barren religious people are paying $50k a pop for or the charmingly moderately disabled kids that “enrich their parents lives with so much joy.”

The experts I have heard (OBGYNs, mostly) have said it is more dangerous on a woman's health to undergo a late term abortion than childbirth.

BS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who has $15,000.00 for an abortion? That's insane.

Cheaper than 18+ years of food, housing, college, etc.

Or extensive medical bills if the child had a serious health issue.

If you don't want the baby, no one will force you to keep the baby. You know that, don't you?

Well, a woman might not be willing to die in order so her severely deformed child can languish for years unwanted in foster care. We’re not talking about the beautiful, healthy white babies that barren religious people are paying $50k a pop for or the charmingly moderately disabled kids that “enrich their parents lives with so much joy.”

The experts I have heard (OBGYNs, mostly) have said it is more dangerous on a woman's health to undergo a late term abortion than childbirth.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who has $15,000.00 for an abortion? That's insane.

Cheaper than 18+ years of food, housing, college, etc.

Or extensive medical bills if the child had a serious health issue.

If you don't want the baby, no one will force you to keep the baby. You know that, don't you?

Well, a woman might not be willing to die in order so her severely deformed child can languish for years unwanted in foster care. We’re not talking about the beautiful, healthy white babies that barren religious people are paying $50k a pop for or the charmingly moderately disabled kids that “enrich their parents lives with so much joy.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who has $15,000.00 for an abortion? That's insane.

Cheaper than 18+ years of food, housing, college, etc.

Or extensive medical bills if the child had a serious health issue.

If you don't want the baby, no one will force you to keep the baby. You know that, don't you?

Anonymous wrote:Who has $15,000.00 for an abortion? That's insane.

Cheaper than 18+ years of food, housing, college, etc.

Or extensive medical bills if the child had a serious health issue.

Who has $15,000.00 for an abortion? That's insane.

Anonymous wrote:

What on earth is an abortion doctor doing to get $15,000. for doing a partial birth abortion?

Wow. His Rambo security team can't cost that much!

I wonder how much insurance these doctors need. Such a dangerous job.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How exactly is "emotional health" defined?

By doctors. Not by you.

It’s a medical decision between a woman and her doctor. END OF STORY.

Just show him the money, and you're good to go!

Who's making stuff up?

It sounds more and more like a BUSINESS decision for the abortion doctors. What doctor says no to a "procedure" the pays BIG bucks? Abortion doctors ain't going it for free. Believe me.

Okay, since you used caps, you must be right.

You MUST know how abortions are HUGE profits. Plus, You're in and back out pretty quickly. Restaurants like to "turn" their tables to increase profits, and abortionists like to quickly turn their beds. The faster, the better!

You know a lot about them. Did you work in an abortion clinic?

No, I would rather starve to death before I would help babies die.

What on earth is an abortion doctor doing to get $15,000. for doing a partial birth abortion?

Wow. His Rambo security team can't cost that much!