Anonymous wrote:"I have decided to retake the SAT and prove that I am capable of scoring higher than 900"
Interesting that her goal isn't to replicate the dramatically improved score but simply to beat her original score. Hmmmmm.
Anonymous wrote:Of course she cheated. But the media gave her free press about the RACISTS at College Board ... and now the proof of her being a cheating liar, apparently at a school run by cheating liars (proctor was obviously in on it), gets 1/1000th of the coverage. That's the media today. And people wonder where "fake news" comes from...
Anonymous wrote:Of course she cheated. But the media gave her free press about the RACISTS at College Board ... and now the proof of her being a cheating liar, apparently at a school run by cheating liars (proctor was obviously in on it), gets 1/1000th of the coverage. That's the media today. And people wonder where "fake news" comes from...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you think that because she dropped the case it means that she definitely cheated? I tend to agree, but interested to hear what people think.
ETS sent her the information about what flagged her scores for cheating and she subsequently withdrew. It's obviously not definitive, but very, very suggestive.
She has answers exact from people she sat around, right and wrong. What an idiot.
Are those students that let her cheat, getting their SAT's taken away. There is not way you can not recognize peering eyes in that type of setting.
Really? I’d imagine most students were focused on their own work.
Yes, it is entirely possible for someone to be unaware that someone else is cheating off their test paper. I know this both as a student and as a teacher.
How is ETS so certain that she was the cheater, and not the other person?
Lack of scrap paper? Seating arrangement?? ETS does this for living. They know what they are doing.
In addition, if both students have taken the test before, they will look at previous scores and see whether one has a big jump in score and the other is in generally in the same neighborhood. They’ve been doing this a long time so they know the signs to look for.
Anonymous wrote:Has this been determined officially as yet?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ha!
"We look forward to exploring ways to make the test security process more transparent and to addressing the broader educational needs of students," the statement adds. "The parties will be meeting again in the very near future."
... so she can collect her check and sign the non-disclosure agreement.
Baloney. They never issued apology and will not reinstate her score. Her attorney went public that he dropped the case. There is no settlement, she CHEATED and they have proof but are not further disclosing to save face for her. The initial outcry against CB is why they are agreeing to look at policies to ensure that there is no inherent bias of the process in general as several parties made valid points about raising scores. But there is absolutely no way that the attorney and girl that went to public in first place and did not get their score reinstated and is trying to now hide from the publicity is getting a settlement. Please, she tried to be opportunistic and got caught AGAIN. Shame on you all that are still defending her. Find a victim worthy of your sympathy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ha!
"We look forward to exploring ways to make the test security process more transparent and to addressing the broader educational needs of students," the statement adds. "The parties will be meeting again in the very near future."
... so she can collect her check and sign the non-disclosure agreement.
Baloney. They never issued apology and will not reinstate her score. Her attorney went public that he dropped the case. There is no settlement, she CHEATED and they have proof but are not further disclosing to save face for her. The initial outcry against CB is why they are agreeing to look at policies to ensure that there is no inherent bias of the process in general as several parties made valid points about raising scores. But there is absolutely no way that the attorney and girl that went to public in first place and did not get their score reinstated and is trying to now hide from the publicity is getting a settlement. Please, she tried to be opportunistic and got caught AGAIN. Shame on you all that are still defending her. Find a victim worthy of your sympathy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you think that because she dropped the case it means that she definitely cheated? I tend to agree, but interested to hear what people think.
ETS sent her the information about what flagged her scores for cheating and she subsequently withdrew. It's obviously not definitive, but very, very suggestive.
She has answers exact from people she sat around, right and wrong. What an idiot.
Are those students that let her cheat, getting their SAT's taken away. There is not way you can not recognize peering eyes in that type of setting.
Really? I’d imagine most students were focused on their own work.
Yes, it is entirely possible for someone to be unaware that someone else is cheating off their test paper. I know this both as a student and as a teacher.
How is ETS so certain that she was the cheater, and not the other person?
Lack of scrap paper? Seating arrangement?? ETS does this for living. They know what they are doing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you think that because she dropped the case it means that she definitely cheated? I tend to agree, but interested to hear what people think.
ETS sent her the information about what flagged her scores for cheating and she subsequently withdrew. It's obviously not definitive, but very, very suggestive.
She has answers exact from people she sat around, right and wrong. What an idiot.
Are those students that let her cheat, getting their SAT's taken away. There is not way you can not recognize peering eyes in that type of setting.
Really? I’d imagine most students were focused on their own work.
Yes, it is entirely possible for someone to be unaware that someone else is cheating off their test paper. I know this both as a student and as a teacher.
How is ETS so certain that she was the cheater, and not the other person?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you think that because she dropped the case it means that she definitely cheated? I tend to agree, but interested to hear what people think.
ETS sent her the information about what flagged her scores for cheating and she subsequently withdrew. It's obviously not definitive, but very, very suggestive.
She has answers exact from people she sat around, right and wrong. What an idiot.
Are those students that let her cheat, getting their SAT's taken away. There is not way you can not recognize peering eyes in that type of setting.
Really? I’d imagine most students were focused on their own work.
Yes, it is entirely possible for someone to be unaware that someone else is cheating off their test paper. I know this both as a student and as a teacher.
How is ETS so certain that she was the cheater, and not the other person?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ha!
"We look forward to exploring ways to make the test security process more transparent and to addressing the broader educational needs of students," the statement adds. "The parties will be meeting again in the very near future."
... so she can collect her check and sign the non-disclosure agreement.
Baloney. They never issued apology and will not reinstate her score. Her attorney went public that he dropped the case. There is no settlement, she CHEATED and they have proof but are not further disclosing to save face for her. The initial outcry against CB is why they are agreeing to look at policies to ensure that there is no inherent bias of the process in general as several parties made valid points about raising scores. But there is absolutely no way that the attorney and girl that went to public in first place and did not get their score reinstated and is trying to now hide from the publicity is getting a settlement. Please, she tried to be opportunistic and got caught AGAIN. Shame on you all that are still defending her. Find a victim worthy of your sympathy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you think that because she dropped the case it means that she definitely cheated? I tend to agree, but interested to hear what people think.
ETS sent her the information about what flagged her scores for cheating and she subsequently withdrew. It's obviously not definitive, but very, very suggestive.
She has answers exact from people she sat around, right and wrong. What an idiot.
Are those students that let her cheat, getting their SAT's taken away. There is not way you can not recognize peering eyes in that type of setting.
Really? I’d imagine most students were focused on their own work.