Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At this point it seems like you people would rather see the town center fail than add even one new kid to the schools.
I don't want my tax money going to help shore up a business that can't stay a float without.
Allowing builders to build more housing in Rockville Town Center, which will put more potential customers within walking distance of the retail in Rockville Town Center (and the surrounding area), is not using your tax money to help shore up a business that can't stay afloat without it.
The pp you’re replying to us referring to the fund set up to support failing businesses (reallly Dawson’s Market). This wouldn’t be needed if we had more housing built. The pp would rather have the town center fail than either bail out businesses or allow building because their precious angel might have an extra 2 kids in homeroom.
That's not how it works. Class size and school capacity are separate variables. Over-capacity, at-capacity, and under-capacity schools all have the same class sizes. The difference is that at over-capacity schools, there are lots of portables, and at under-capacity schools, there are empty classrooms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At this point it seems like you people would rather see the town center fail than add even one new kid to the schools.
I don't want my tax money going to help shore up a business that can't stay a float without.
Allowing builders to build more housing in Rockville Town Center, which will put more potential customers within walking distance of the retail in Rockville Town Center (and the surrounding area), is not using your tax money to help shore up a business that can't stay afloat without it.
The pp you’re replying to us referring to the fund set up to support failing businesses (reallly Dawson’s Market). This wouldn’t be needed if we had more housing built. The pp would rather have the town center fail than either bail out businesses or allow building because their precious angel might have an extra 2 kids in homeroom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At this point it seems like you people would rather see the town center fail than add even one new kid to the schools.
I don't want my tax money going to help shore up a business that can't stay a float without.
Allowing builders to build more housing in Rockville Town Center, which will put more potential customers within walking distance of the retail in Rockville Town Center (and the surrounding area), is not using your tax money to help shore up a business that can't stay afloat without it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At this point it seems like you people would rather see the town center fail than add even one new kid to the schools.
I don't want my tax money going to help shore up a business that can't stay a float without.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know when exactly the building moratorium would go into effect?
Why hasn’t anyone watched the council meeting I linked earlier in the thread? They literally answer this question. It goes into effect next year. That’s why they’re raising the threshold now.
Could you repost the link please?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know when exactly the building moratorium would go into effect?
Why hasn’t anyone watched the council meeting I linked earlier in the thread? They literally answer this question. It goes into effect next year. That’s why they’re raising the threshold now.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know when exactly the building moratorium would go into effect?
Anonymous wrote:At this point it seems like you people would rather see the town center fail than add even one new kid to the schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At this point it seems like you people would rather see the town center fail than add even one new kid to the schools.
You make it sound as if putting up more high density housing will save RTC. That is an incorrect assumption. Attracting better stores might help. Making it more inviting might help. Easier parking could be an improvement.
Adding another high rise to an already crowded area is not going to help RTC. In fact, if it leads to even worse overcrowding of the schools, then people will choose to live elsewhere anyway.
Anonymous wrote:They have no business adding more housing without adequate infrastructure or schools.
Anonymous wrote:At this point it seems like you people would rather see the town center fail than add even one new kid to the schools.
Anonymous wrote:At this point it seems like you people would rather see the town center fail than add even one new kid to the schools.