Anonymous wrote:Other than the gerrymandered district in Maryland, are there any examples of democrats suppressing votes by removing polling stations, limiting booths in polling stations etc?

Anonymous wrote:Imagin Nov. 3: Millions can't get their mail ballots on time & see several hours-long voting lines.

Add on: Trump leads on Election Night in the pivotal states even though we know he'll lose once once mail votes are counted afterward. Trump calls them fraud & rejects the result.

He challenges the results and asks Barr to enlist the military to "protect" the White House.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:White rage... LOL. Really sets the tone for the interview. Wack job alert.

I hear nothing in terms of substance, just a lot of race based blaming of white people.

Being reasonable is a cover? She complains about scrubbing voter rolls because people move - people are supposed to vote in the location where they live, and only in the location where they live, how is this prejudicial? The election bodies of the governments are charged with the work of enforcing rules and policies, you can't argue that the enforcement of rules and policies are bad just because you don't like the outcome. A citizen's right to vote comes with the responsibility of following the rules to keeping their voter registration updated.

Rights have responsibilities!!!

The NRA called. They want you to tone it down a bit - that line of argument is making them a bit uncomfortable.

LOL, PP here and I agree. NRA strays a little too far some times towards fighting against any attempt at regulation. This is one of the reasons why I cancelled my membership. I still go to their range, however, so they get their money from me that way.

Anonymous wrote:White rage... LOL. Really sets the tone for the interview. Wack job alert.

I hear nothing in terms of substance, just a lot of race based blaming of white people.

Being reasonable is a cover? She complains about scrubbing voter rolls because people move - people are supposed to vote in the location where they live, and only in the location where they live, how is this prejudicial? The election bodies of the governments are charged with the work of enforcing rules and policies, you can't argue that the enforcement of rules and policies are bad just because you don't like the outcome. A citizen's right to vote comes with the responsibility of following the rules to keeping their voter registration updated.

Rights have responsibilities!!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no urgent reason to vote by mail anymore. That went out the window this past week.

Tuesday is a workday. That’s enough reason.

So was every day last week. Yet, that did not prevent the masses from hitting the streets in protest.
If protest is important, so is voting. It can be done.
If it is such a problem, convince your state legislature to implement early voting, including Saturdays. That is what my state does.

You know very well that not every American protested. Terrible argument.

There shouldn’t need to be convincing. Voting should be as easy as possible.

And, states are no where even close to ready to implement vote by mail state-wide.
And, there is the issue of fraud, which I know is debatable, but there seems to be issues there.....

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no urgent reason to vote by mail anymore. That went out the window this past week.

Tuesday is a workday. That’s enough reason.

So was every day last week. Yet, that did not prevent the masses from hitting the streets in protest.
If protest is important, so is voting. It can be done.
If it is such a problem, convince your state legislature to implement early voting, including Saturdays. That is what my state does.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no urgent reason to vote by mail anymore. That went out the window this past week.

Tuesday is a workday. That’s enough reason.

So was every day last week. Yet, that did not prevent the masses from hitting the streets in protest.
If protest is important, so is voting. It can be done.
If it is such a problem, convince your state legislature to implement early voting, including Saturdays. That is what my state does.

You know very well that not every American protested. Terrible argument.

There shouldn’t need to be convincing. Voting should be as easy as possible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no urgent reason to vote by mail anymore. That went out the window this past week.

Tuesday is a workday. That’s enough reason.

So was every day last week. Yet, that did not prevent the masses from hitting the streets in protest.
If protest is important, so is voting. It can be done.
If it is such a problem, convince your state legislature to implement early voting, including Saturdays. That is what my state does.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no urgent reason to vote by mail anymore. That went out the window this past week.

Tuesday is a workday. That’s enough reason.

Anonymous wrote:There is no urgent reason to vote by mail anymore. That went out the window this past week.