Anonymous wrote:If I saw a school had a 31 point jump (any school), the first thing I would do is check the math
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shining Stars is a Tier 1 school now!
https://www.dcpcsb.org/more-students-ever-attend-top-ranked-public-charter-school
"Ten schools made the jump from Tier 2 to Tier 1 this year, with Shining Stars Montessori Academy PCS improving by 31 points"
This is great news for the future of SSMA.
The only sour note for me -- and the reason I am posting it on this thread - is that the "Shake Up at SSMA" last year was clearly totally unjustified. I don't know why the last director of education left the school. But hats off to her. She did a remarkable job for SSMA. If you're reading this - Ms. W - Thank you!
I remember the low score being a lot because of attendance. What's the jump attributable to? Better attendance is less impressive than perhaps other markers.
Compare the last two year's reports for yourself. You can see what improved - not just attendance (although that was up).
http://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/2017-11-8%20PMF%20Score%20Card%20SY16-17_Shining%20Stars%20Montessori%20Academy%20PCS_2017.pdf
https://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/2018-10-29%20Shining%20Stars%20Montessori%20Academy%20PCS%20PK3-8%20PMF.pdf
I'm not clear on the exact weighting, but, the main difference really is the re-enrollment and attendance. Should those really matter THAT much?!
They also had no growth score last year. But their growth scores this year are uneven.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok. One of you told the Board. The link to the PMF is off their landing page: https://www.dcpcsb.org/school/shining-stars-montessori-academy-pcs
I did.
Anonymous wrote:Ok. One of you told the Board. The link to the PMF is off their landing page: https://www.dcpcsb.org/school/shining-stars-montessori-academy-pcs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just looked at Roots, which is scored on the same 90 point scale:
https://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/2018-10-29%20Roots%20PCS%20PK3-8%20PMF.pdf
And they got 33.7 out of 90 which is 37.4%, just as it says on their PMF. The math for SSMA should be the same and it's not.
SSMA got 60.7% and that's Tier 2.
I think you are right- at first I thought maybe the "additional measures" on page 2 of the PMF scoring sheet factored into the score at Shining Stars, but Roots has a similar page 2 with "additional measures" and it doesn't include those scores in the overall score.
So does the SSMA administration ethically flag this to the DCPCSB. I notice they haven't pushed out the Tiering on their social media. I wonder if that's why. And DCPCSB used SSMA growth as a talking point. Hard to put this one back in the bag
Parents were emailed about the ranking this am.
Did they say Tier One? Or were they emailed that the ranking was incorrect
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just looked at Roots, which is scored on the same 90 point scale:
https://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/2018-10-29%20Roots%20PCS%20PK3-8%20PMF.pdf
And they got 33.7 out of 90 which is 37.4%, just as it says on their PMF. The math for SSMA should be the same and it's not.
SSMA got 60.7% and that's Tier 2.
I think you are right- at first I thought maybe the "additional measures" on page 2 of the PMF scoring sheet factored into the score at Shining Stars, but Roots has a similar page 2 with "additional measures" and it doesn't include those scores in the overall score.
So does the SSMA administration ethically flag this to the DCPCSB. I notice they haven't pushed out the Tiering on their social media. I wonder if that's why. And DCPCSB used SSMA growth as a talking point. Hard to put this one back in the bag
Parents were emailed about the ranking this am.