Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
That kind of self-centeredness is purely evil when you are talking about your children's sibling. Put your kids first, sure. Insist that their sibling be abandoned so that you can enjoy better finances? That's morally reprehensible. It makes her worse than the cheater.
Nope. Her moral obligation to her husband's bastard spawn is exactly the same as her moral obligation to any other child in the world that's not hers: ZERO.
She is not morally obliged to feed, clothe, house, or care for any other child but her own. If she chooses to do so, that's admirable, but she is not "self-centered and evil" if she does not.
Anonymous wrote:
That kind of self-centeredness is purely evil when you are talking about your children's sibling. Put your kids first, sure. Insist that their sibling be abandoned so that you can enjoy better finances? That's morally reprehensible. It makes her worse than the cheater.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My father slept with my 17 year old cousin (mother's niece). He also slept with the 16 year old babysitter and a host of his coworkers (who were also my mother's coworkers because they worked together). My mother blamed the women and girls and stayed with him. Although I was only 5 at the time he slept with my cousin, I distinctly recall knowing something was off and I missed her terribly because she was sweet, vulnerable and kind.
Years later, when I learned of why my favorite cousin had suddenly disappeared from my life, I lost tremendous respect for both of my parents. By then, I had also found out about the other affairs because the fallout from some of them was public. I have a great deal of contempt for both of my parents. My father is a disgusting pig and my mother is a spineless coward.
So where was this, Kentucky, West Virginia, Arkansas?
Anonymous wrote:10:58 wins my award for most amazing wronged wife story. Hats off to that woman & so awed by her ability to do the right AND expedient, smart thing. Holy sh*t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was talking about this thread with a friend who said that the exact same thing happened in her family. Her parents had SEVEN kids, and her father became distant. He was having an affair, and the woman got pregnant, and expected to control him. He actually left his wife to be with this woman. Then the lawyers got together to discuss the divorce, and he realized that he would lose "everything". So he scrambled back and begged his wife to take him back. She had kids ages 2-16. She took him back, but only with the condition that he cut off all, ALL, contact with the other woman and the child. Fast forward 35 years, they are happily married.
My friend said that a divorce would have been expensive and acrimonious. Her siblings would not have stood a chance of college at all. The other child did get support until age 18. Yes, "unfair", but in this case, more kids (7) were better off. One child, was worse off.
That's crazy! With 7 kids, that's probably the only way it could have worked out. You can't really leave a marriage with 7 kids.
Maybe. But I have no respect for a person who ask their spouse to cut off another child, no matter how the child came to being. That is some nastiness right there.
There was a lot of nastiness. The nastiest was the father, then the OW, then the mother of the 7 kids who puts her brain into pure survival mode.
Yeah, the mother of 7 is BY FAR the best person, morally, in the situation.
No one disagrees. But she is still evil. And did she screw her husband knowing the only reason he was with her was because he could not afford to be with the other woman?
I hope some of you supporting this are not the very ones shitting on Melania Trump in the Political Forum.
When people are in survival mode, how can you call them evil? She has to do what she has to do. She needs an intact home to raise the kids. She NEEDS that. OW obviously was willing to risk it all, and she lost. In this case, wife was right and her children should thank her for taking control of the situation and protecting them.
She WANTS that. She doesn't need it. The kids aren't going to get eaten by bears or slaughtered by a rival village if she is divorced. Lots of divorced families out there getting along just fine.
It's kind of crazy that you expect a mother to sacrifice the wellbeing of her seven kids, their education, stable home and financial security in favor of another child unrelated to her who she neither met nor wanted in her life. A mother looks our for her kids, number one, two and three. She doesn't care about any other kids, nor should she.
That kind of self-centeredness is purely evil when you are talking about your children's sibling. Put your kids first, sure. Insist that their sibling be abandoned so that you can enjoy better finances? That's morally reprehensible. It makes her worse than the cheater.
Anonymous wrote:10:58 wins my award for most amazing wronged wife story. Hats off to that woman & so awed by her ability to do the right AND expedient, smart thing. Holy sh*t.
Anonymous wrote:My father slept with my 17 year old cousin (mother's niece). He also slept with the 16 year old babysitter and a host of his coworkers (who were also my mother's coworkers because they worked together). My mother blamed the women and girls and stayed with him. Although I was only 5 at the time he slept with my cousin, I distinctly recall knowing something was off and I missed her terribly because she was sweet, vulnerable and kind.
Years later, when I learned of why my favorite cousin had suddenly disappeared from my life, I lost tremendous respect for both of my parents. By then, I had also found out about the other affairs because the fallout from some of them was public. I have a great deal of contempt for both of my parents. My father is a disgusting pig and my mother is a spineless coward.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My father slept with my 17 year old cousin (mother's niece). He also slept with the 16 year old babysitter and a host of his coworkers (who were also my mother's coworkers because they worked together). My mother blamed the women and girls and stayed with him. Although I was only 5 at the time he slept with my cousin, I distinctly recall knowing something was off and I missed her terribly because she was sweet, vulnerable and kind.
Years later, when I learned of why my favorite cousin had suddenly disappeared from my life, I lost tremendous respect for both of my parents. By then, I had also found out about the other affairs because the fallout from some of them was public. I have a great deal of contempt for both of my parents. My father is a disgusting pig and my mother is a spineless coward.
16 year old baby sitter would make him guilty of statutory rape in many states. Sleeping with the 17 year old cousin is abusive.
Your dad is worse than a pig. He's an abuser. Your mom is complicit in sexual abuse.
Anonymous wrote:My father slept with my 17 year old cousin (mother's niece). He also slept with the 16 year old babysitter and a host of his coworkers (who were also my mother's coworkers because they worked together). My mother blamed the women and girls and stayed with him. Although I was only 5 at the time he slept with my cousin, I distinctly recall knowing something was off and I missed her terribly because she was sweet, vulnerable and kind.
Years later, when I learned of why my favorite cousin had suddenly disappeared from my life, I lost tremendous respect for both of my parents. By then, I had also found out about the other affairs because the fallout from some of them was public. I have a great deal of contempt for both of my parents. My father is a disgusting pig and my mother is a spineless coward.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was talking about this thread with a friend who said that the exact same thing happened in her family. Her parents had SEVEN kids, and her father became distant. He was having an affair, and the woman got pregnant, and expected to control him. He actually left his wife to be with this woman. Then the lawyers got together to discuss the divorce, and he realized that he would lose "everything". So he scrambled back and begged his wife to take him back. She had kids ages 2-16. She took him back, but only with the condition that he cut off all, ALL, contact with the other woman and the child. Fast forward 35 years, they are happily married.
My friend said that a divorce would have been expensive and acrimonious. Her siblings would not have stood a chance of college at all. The other child did get support until age 18. Yes, "unfair", but in this case, more kids (7) were better off. One child, was worse off.
That's crazy! With 7 kids, that's probably the only way it could have worked out. You can't really leave a marriage with 7 kids.
Maybe. But I have no respect for a person who ask their spouse to cut off another child, no matter how the child came to being. That is some nastiness right there.
There was a lot of nastiness. The nastiest was the father, then the OW, then the mother of the 7 kids who puts her brain into pure survival mode.
Yeah, the mother of 7 is BY FAR the best person, morally, in the situation.
No one disagrees. But she is still evil. And did she screw her husband knowing the only reason he was with her was because he could not afford to be with the other woman?
I hope some of you supporting this are not the very ones shitting on Melania Trump in the Political Forum.
When people are in survival mode, how can you call them evil? She has to do what she has to do. She needs an intact home to raise the kids. She NEEDS that. OW obviously was willing to risk it all, and she lost. In this case, wife was right and her children should thank her for taking control of the situation and protecting them.
She WANTS that. She doesn't need it. The kids aren't going to get eaten by bears or slaughtered by a rival village if she is divorced. Lots of divorced families out there getting along just fine.
It's kind of crazy that you expect a mother to sacrifice the wellbeing of her seven kids, their education, stable home and financial security in favor of another child unrelated to her who she neither met nor wanted in her life. A mother looks our for her kids, number one, two and three. She doesn't care about any other kids, nor should she.