I agree. My son is in 1st grade and there are a number of redshirted or otherwise held back boys in his class that are more than a year older. They are genuinely nice kids, but socially, they have nothing in common with a 6 year old. If too many parents do it, or too many kids are held back for academic or attendance reasons by the school, it creates an inappropriate social environment for the kids who are the expected age for their grade.
This is what we see happening. When it comes to assessing the kids, the kids two years older (1st grade) who are 8 are more advanced in some, not all so the grading is geared to what they are doing rather than the 6-7 year olds who are age/grade appropriate (who are all doing well academically). So, our younger kids are getting poor report cards and the older kids are getting excellent ones as they are working below what they should be.
Anonymous wrote:Why do you care? My son has had continuing delays and at the recommendation of his preschool, his developmental pediatrician, and our careful consideration, will turn 7 in K. He is socially around 5. It is simply none of your concern.
Most of the 7 year olds in K are not "socially around 5", they are "socially around 7". That's why we care, and I'm not sure why you don't.
I agree. My son is in 1st grade and there are a number of redshirted or otherwise held back boys in his class that are more than a year older. They are genuinely nice kids, but socially, they have nothing in common with a 6 year old. If too many parents do it, or too many kids are held back for academic or attendance reasons by the school, it creates an inappropriate social environment for the kids who are the expected age for their grade.
Why do you care? My son has had continuing delays and at the recommendation of his preschool, his developmental pediatrician, and our careful consideration, will turn 7 in K. He is socially around 5. It is simply none of your concern.
Most of the 7 year olds in K are not "socially around 5", they are "socially around 7". That's why we care, and I'm not sure why you don't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you care? My son has had continuing delays and at the recommendation of his preschool, his developmental pediatrician, and our careful consideration, will turn 7 in K. He is socially around 5. It is simply none of your concern.
Most of the 7 year olds in K are not "socially around 5", they are "socially around 7". That's why we care, and I'm not sure why you don't.
Anonymous wrote:Just think, that's going to a 20-year-old high school senior some day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you care? My son has had continuing delays and at the recommendation of his preschool, his developmental pediatrician, and our careful consideration, will turn 7 in K. He is socially around 5. It is simply none of your concern.
Most of the 7 year olds in K are not "socially around 5", they are "socially around 7". That's why we care, and I'm not sure why you don't.
Anonymous wrote:The biggest problem is that it turns classes into combination classes which ends up being more for the teacher to deal with.
Anonymous wrote:The biggest problem is that it turns classes into combination classes which ends up being more for the teacher to deal with.
Anonymous wrote:Why do you care? My son has had continuing delays and at the recommendation of his preschool, his developmental pediatrician, and our careful consideration, will turn 7 in K. He is socially around 5. It is simply none of your concern.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:daughter in first grade just told me today 2 kids in her class already turned eight! this is FIRST GRADE!!!!!
This is ridiculous. My DC will only turn 8 in summer after he is done with his 2nd grade. So these 8 years old first graders are older than my 2nd grader!!