Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got in an argument with our civic association about the design of a park renovation. The design the parents in the neighborhood came up with had a water feature, a climbing structure, and play equipment. After the initial design was approved, the really old folks (I mean--lots of people in their 70's and 80's) showed up en masse and insisted that the design revert to how it was back in the 1960's. (!!!) So we have a bathroom, two swings, and a slide.
Nauck Park? That was such a missed opportunity...
Yes. The county was unwilling to say no to the civic association, despite policies about park amenities.
I don't understand this. First, that is like the worst playground in the county. In fact - I believe some guy put out a guide to Arlington's parks, and his kids rated them and Nauck was decidedly lame.
What did they ( the old and decrepit) have against the improvements? Was it either/or with putting in a bathroom? Does it have something to with the history of that area? It used to be a segregated and rough part of town. The changes there have been possibly more profound than any other area.
Anyone else imagining zombies from walking dead descending on these civic meetings?
I'm being terrible. These are the people who have built up our communities. I know that, but sometimes it's hard to empathize.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dorsey has kids in the schools? Good - he won't be inclined to ignore this stuff,
He's got my vote!!!
McMeniman always had it.
Where does Dorsey have his kids in school??
ATS for the older one. Younger child is in preschool.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dorsey has kids in the schools? Good - he won't be inclined to ignore this stuff,
He's got my vote!!!
McMeniman always had it.
Where does Dorsey have his kids in school??
ATS for the older one. Younger child is in preschool.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got in an argument with our civic association about the design of a park renovation. The design the parents in the neighborhood came up with had a water feature, a climbing structure, and play equipment. After the initial design was approved, the really old folks (I mean--lots of people in their 70's and 80's) showed up en masse and insisted that the design revert to how it was back in the 1960's. (!!!) So we have a bathroom, two swings, and a slide.
Nauck Park? That was such a missed opportunity...
Yes. The county was unwilling to say no to the civic association, despite policies about park amenities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got in an argument with our civic association about the design of a park renovation. The design the parents in the neighborhood came up with had a water feature, a climbing structure, and play equipment. After the initial design was approved, the really old folks (I mean--lots of people in their 70's and 80's) showed up en masse and insisted that the design revert to how it was back in the 1960's. (!!!) So we have a bathroom, two swings, and a slide.
Nauck Park? That was such a missed opportunity...
Anonymous wrote:I posted earlier in this thread and wanted to echo the person who encouraged people to get involved in their neighborhood associations. I'm in my early 40s with kids in elementary school and became more active on the neighborhood board in recent years. Yes, I would probably enjoy PTA more. But I could see that our association was being dominated by the 50/60 something empty nesters when I attended a neighborhood meeting once to complain about speeding on a street heavily used by kids going back and forth to a playground. I was told that there was nothing to be done because it wasn't in the Neighborhood Conservation Plan that they had voted for almost 10 years ago! It had already been decided (back then) that our "conservation points" were going to be allocated to new street lights. They would not raise my issue to the county because they were still trying to get their street lights updated per the "plan" and didn't want to detract attention from the "real" issue. Over the past four years we've gotten more involvement in our neighborhood board from the Gen-Xers and new millenials moving in and the tone has changed, but I imagine this is not the case in other Arlington neighborhoods. I agree there is a north/south divide, but also a generational divide within neighborhoods. Talk to anyone in your neighborhood over the age of 50 about the iPad for every second grader initiative and their blood just boils- paper and pencil worked for them and for their kids- why do we need to spend money to give every kid a fancy electronic device. It makes for colorful conversations.
Anonymous wrote:Dorsey has kids in the schools? Good - he won't be inclined to ignore this stuff,
He's got my vote!!!
McMeniman always had it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got in an argument with our civic association about the design of a park renovation. The design the parents in the neighborhood came up with had a water feature, a climbing structure, and play equipment. After the initial design was approved, the really old folks (I mean--lots of people in their 70's and 80's) showed up en masse and insisted that the design revert to how it was back in the 1960's. (!!!) So we have a bathroom, two swings, and a slide.
Nauck Park? That was such a missed opportunity...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got in an argument with our civic association about the design of a park renovation. The design the parents in the neighborhood came up with had a water feature, a climbing structure, and play equipment. After the initial design was approved, the really old folks (I mean--lots of people in their 70's and 80's) showed up en masse and insisted that the design revert to how it was back in the 1960's. (!!!) So we have a bathroom, two swings, and a slide.
Nauck Park? That was such a missed opportunity...
Anonymous wrote:We got in an argument with our civic association about the design of a park renovation. The design the parents in the neighborhood came up with had a water feature, a climbing structure, and play equipment. After the initial design was approved, the really old folks (I mean--lots of people in their 70's and 80's) showed up en masse and insisted that the design revert to how it was back in the 1960's. (!!!) So we have a bathroom, two swings, and a slide.
Anonymous wrote:I posted earlier in this thread and wanted to echo the person who encouraged people to get involved in their neighborhood associations. I'm in my early 40s with kids in elementary school and became more active on the neighborhood board in recent years. Yes, I would probably enjoy PTA more. But I could see that our association was being dominated by the 50/60 something empty nesters when I attended a neighborhood meeting once to complain about speeding on a street heavily used by kids going back and forth to a playground. I was told that there was nothing to be done because it wasn't in the Neighborhood Conservation Plan that they had voted for almost 10 years ago! It had already been decided (back then) that our "conservation points" were going to be allocated to new street lights. They would not raise my issue to the county because they were still trying to get their street lights updated per the "plan" and didn't want to detract attention from the "real" issue. Over the past four years we've gotten more involvement in our neighborhood board from the Gen-Xers and new millenials moving in and the tone has changed, but I imagine this is not the case in other Arlington neighborhoods. I agree there is a north/south divide, but also a generational divide within neighborhoods. Talk to anyone in your neighborhood over the age of 50 about the iPad for every second grader initiative and their blood just boils- paper and pencil worked for them and for their kids- why do we need to spend money to give every kid a fancy electronic device. It makes for colorful conversations.
Anonymous wrote:I posted earlier in this thread and wanted to echo the person who encouraged people to get involved in their neighborhood associations. I'm in my early 40s with kids in elementary school and became more active on the neighborhood board in recent years. Yes, I would probably enjoy PTA more. But I could see that our association was being dominated by the 50/60 something empty nesters when I attended a neighborhood meeting once to complain about speeding on a street heavily used by kids going back and forth to a playground. I was told that there was nothing to be done because it wasn't in the Neighborhood Conservation Plan that they had voted for almost 10 years ago! It had already been decided (back then) that our "conservation points" were going to be allocated to new street lights. They would not raise my issue to the county because they were still trying to get their street lights updated per the "plan" and didn't want to detract attention from the "real" issue. Over the past four years we've gotten more involvement in our neighborhood board from the Gen-Xers and new millenials moving in and the tone has changed, but I imagine this is not the case in other Arlington neighborhoods. I agree there is a north/south divide, but also a generational divide within neighborhoods. Talk to anyone in your neighborhood over the age of 50 about the iPad for every second grader initiative and their blood just boils- paper and pencil worked for them and for their kids- why do we need to spend money to give every kid a fancy electronic device. It makes for colorful conversations.