Anonymous wrote:For those of you stating how long you could survive without a paycheck, does that include you pulling from your retirement or strictly living off your savings?
I could last until January with my savings, but would have to dip into my home equity or Thrift after that.
I'm just curious which reserves folks are speaking of?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a GS-14, my husband is a contractor, we could afford several weeks of shutdown. It would hurt (bad) but we could.
But, see, it's not about me. It's about my GS-7 secretary who went on food stamps in 1996 during the last shutdown. It's my GS-12 staff member who has two kids in college and is living pay check to paycheck to pay for those kids.
It's the thousands of hardworking Feds who are trapped in this political game between a bunch of rich, old white men (mostly).
Amen.
Funny that you say it's rich white men. The core of the shutdown is about poor, brown people taking money from your secretary and staff member.
Anonymous wrote:Well, my DH is a GS-15 and I work for a nonprofit. We cannot afford for my DH to not get paid. I don't think we live extravagantly but somehow cannot save much. Due to some unexpected expenses lately, we have only $2k in savings. We have 2 kids in elementary school. We cannot afford this at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People without adequate emergency funds simply spend too much relative to their incomes. Failing to constrain spending to an appropriate level is the problem. No matter how little you make, you have to spend less than that on housing, cars, vacations, kids' activities, recreation, etc. It's not complicated, but it requires discipline. And for those who argue they have uninsured medical expenses which excuse a lack of savings, no that is no excuse - you, too, can spend less on housing, on cars, etc. You may want a shorter commute, or a nicer place to live, or a nicer car, or a vacation, but you can only afford what your income allows relative to your expenses. Failing to save for your future and for emergencies is simply a choice, not something imposed on you by a cruel world.
Feel better? Hope you or your family don't get cancer and lose your health insurance.
You don't have to lose health insurance, but it may be expensive if it's no longer partially subsidized by an employer. That means you spend money on health insurance instead of on other things. Prioritizing other expenses over health insurance is a choice. Not taking a job which offers medical insurance because you'd prefer a different job is a choice.
Bad luck will find you someday.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For those of you stating how long you could survive without a paycheck, does that include you pulling from your retirement or strictly living off your savings?
I could last until January with my savings, but would have to dip into my home equity or Thrift after that.
I'm just curious which reserves folks are speaking of?
I would get another job, even if it’s at Home Depot before taking from my retirement. When I say my savings I mean my checking account + stocks and other financial investments.
Anonymous wrote:For those of you stating how long you could survive without a paycheck, does that include you pulling from your retirement or strictly living off your savings?
I could last until January with my savings, but would have to dip into my home equity or Thrift after that.
I'm just curious which reserves folks are speaking of?
Anonymous wrote:I feel like this shutdown is exposing those who have ample financial resources saved/invested and those who are living paycheck to paycheck. It’s really a sucky predicament.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a GS-14, my husband is a contractor, we could afford several weeks of shutdown. It would hurt (bad) but we could.
But, see, it's not about me. It's about my GS-7 secretary who went on food stamps in 1996 during the last shutdown. It's my GS-12 staff member who has two kids in college and is living pay check to paycheck to pay for those kids.
It's the thousands of hardworking Feds who are trapped in this political game between a bunch of rich, old white men (mostly).
Amen.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a GS-14, my husband is a contractor, we could afford several weeks of shutdown. It would hurt (bad) but we could.
But, see, it's not about me. It's about my GS-7 secretary who went on food stamps in 1996 during the last shutdown. It's my GS-12 staff member who has two kids in college and is living pay check to paycheck to pay for those kids.
It's the thousands of hardworking Feds who are trapped in this political game between a bunch of rich, old white men (mostly).
Anonymous wrote:It's the carried interest trade game. They took out mortgages instead of paying them off promptly, they invested the money. It's not liquid.
That's the problem, they have money just not liquid.