Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Motion passed 4-1 to move Langston to Grace Hopper

Who opposed?

Turner

Why?

Someone will rush in and say it’s because she’s a republican evil APE but it’s an unformed plan and many kids are concerned about losing their small, supportive program.

Hi APE! You sure do jump in real fast to defend your leader, Miranda.

This totally fits that Ms. APE opposed this. APE doesn't want the ankle bracelet kids near their snowflakes. APE doesn't want to share their shiny new building with anyone else. Could take away opportunies from APEs' kids. They don't like that.

Of course Turner is going to say its because plan is informed and not good for Langston kids. But we see through that. It's just like when they screamed OPEN UP NOOWWW during Covid claiming it was due to concern for low income hispanics or kids mental health or some other thing that sounded good. But of course they didn't care about those things - they were just convenient talking points.

oh girl. No. Langston folks have a great arguement.

oh girl. turner doesn't care about langston

I don’t think any of them do, if they did they wouldn’t have approved the move when the Langston community was expressing their concern.

+1 Langston families and teachers strongly opposed. The others should have voted no too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Motion passed 4-1 to move Langston to Grace Hopper

Who opposed?

Turner

Why?

Someone will rush in and say it’s because she’s a republican evil APE but it’s an unformed plan and many kids are concerned about losing their small, supportive program.

Hi APE! You sure do jump in real fast to defend your leader, Miranda.

This totally fits that Ms. APE opposed this. APE doesn't want the ankle bracelet kids near their snowflakes. APE doesn't want to share their shiny new building with anyone else. Could take away opportunies from APEs' kids. They don't like that.

Of course Turner is going to say its because plan is informed and not good for Langston kids. But we see through that. It's just like when they screamed OPEN UP NOOWWW during Covid claiming it was due to concern for low income hispanics or kids mental health or some other thing that sounded good. But of course they didn't care about those things - they were just convenient talking points.

oh girl. No. Langston folks have a great arguement.

oh girl. turner doesn't care about langston

I don’t think any of them do, if they did they wouldn’t have approved the move when the Langston community was expressing their concern.

+1 Langston families and teachers strongly opposed. The others should have voted no too.

I suspect that while this was put up for a vote they really did not have a choice. I don’t think the school board operates independently from Durán in any meaningful way. They are there to rubber stamp his agenda, occasionally expressing mild concern. I think when the budget is released we will see some fiscal advantages to this plan, though they swore that had nothing to do with it.

+1 Faces change, school board rubber stamp remains the same.

Might as well get rid of them and save the money.

Get rid of the school board? Ok? Some of us care about electing our leadership. You don't? Who would run the school system?

Same person who runs it now, Duran

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Motion passed 4-1 to move Langston to Grace Hopper

Who opposed?

Turner

Why?

Someone will rush in and say it’s because she’s a republican evil APE but it’s an unformed plan and many kids are concerned about losing their small, supportive program.

Hi APE! You sure do jump in real fast to defend your leader, Miranda.

This totally fits that Ms. APE opposed this. APE doesn't want the ankle bracelet kids near their snowflakes. APE doesn't want to share their shiny new building with anyone else. Could take away opportunies from APEs' kids. They don't like that.

Of course Turner is going to say its because plan is informed and not good for Langston kids. But we see through that. It's just like when they screamed OPEN UP NOOWWW during Covid claiming it was due to concern for low income hispanics or kids mental health or some other thing that sounded good. But of course they didn't care about those things - they were just convenient talking points.

oh girl. No. Langston folks have a great arguement.

oh girl. turner doesn't care about langston

I don’t think any of them do, if they did they wouldn’t have approved the move when the Langston community was expressing their concern.

+1 Langston families and teachers strongly opposed. The others should have voted no too.

I suspect that while this was put up for a vote they really did not have a choice. I don’t think the school board operates independently from Durán in any meaningful way. They are there to rubber stamp his agenda, occasionally expressing mild concern. I think when the budget is released we will see some fiscal advantages to this plan, though they swore that had nothing to do with it.

+1 Faces change, school board rubber stamp remains the same.

Might as well get rid of them and save the money.

Get rid of the school board? Ok? Some of us care about electing our leadership. You don't? Who would run the school system?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Motion passed 4-1 to move Langston to Grace Hopper

Who opposed?

Turner

Why?

Someone will rush in and say it’s because she’s a republican evil APE but it’s an unformed plan and many kids are concerned about losing their small, supportive program.

Hi APE! You sure do jump in real fast to defend your leader, Miranda.

This totally fits that Ms. APE opposed this. APE doesn't want the ankle bracelet kids near their snowflakes. APE doesn't want to share their shiny new building with anyone else. Could take away opportunies from APEs' kids. They don't like that.

Of course Turner is going to say its because plan is informed and not good for Langston kids. But we see through that. It's just like when they screamed OPEN UP NOOWWW during Covid claiming it was due to concern for low income hispanics or kids mental health or some other thing that sounded good. But of course they didn't care about those things - they were just convenient talking points.

oh girl. No. Langston folks have a great arguement.

oh girl. turner doesn't care about langston

I don’t think any of them do, if they did they wouldn’t have approved the move when the Langston community was expressing their concern.

+1 Langston families and teachers strongly opposed. The others should have voted no too.

I suspect that while this was put up for a vote they really did not have a choice. I don’t think the school board operates independently from Durán in any meaningful way. They are there to rubber stamp his agenda, occasionally expressing mild concern. I think when the budget is released we will see some fiscal advantages to this plan, though they swore that had nothing to do with it.

+1 Faces change, school board rubber stamp remains the same.

Might as well get rid of them and save the money.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah and they had to vote before the budget is released which means not much time.

it wasn’t clear to me why they had to vote before the budget was released, unless they had long been planning this and it was all in the budget already, which is what I suspect. They knew it was not going to be popular, which is why it wasn’t presented earlier, even their own timeline shows they had engagement on this once in 2024 and then waited an entire year before they engaged again.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Motion passed 4-1 to move Langston to Grace Hopper

Who opposed?

Turner

Why?

Someone will rush in and say it’s because she’s a republican evil APE but it’s an unformed plan and many kids are concerned about losing their small, supportive program.

Hi APE! You sure do jump in real fast to defend your leader, Miranda.

This totally fits that Ms. APE opposed this. APE doesn't want the ankle bracelet kids near their snowflakes. APE doesn't want to share their shiny new building with anyone else. Could take away opportunies from APEs' kids. They don't like that.

Of course Turner is going to say its because plan is informed and not good for Langston kids. But we see through that. It's just like when they screamed OPEN UP NOOWWW during Covid claiming it was due to concern for low income hispanics or kids mental health or some other thing that sounded good. But of course they didn't care about those things - they were just convenient talking points.

oh girl. No. Langston folks have a great arguement.

oh girl. turner doesn't care about langston

I don’t think any of them do, if they did they wouldn’t have approved the move when the Langston community was expressing their concern.

+1 Langston families and teachers strongly opposed. The others should have voted no too.

I suspect that while this was put up for a vote they really did not have a choice. I don’t think the school board operates independently from Durán in any meaningful way. They are there to rubber stamp his agenda, occasionally expressing mild concern. I think when the budget is released we will see some fiscal advantages to this plan, though they swore that had nothing to do with it.

+1 Faces change, school board rubber stamp remains the same.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Motion passed 4-1 to move Langston to Grace Hopper

Who opposed?

Turner

Why?

Someone will rush in and say it’s because she’s a republican evil APE but it’s an unformed plan and many kids are concerned about losing their small, supportive program.

Hi APE! You sure do jump in real fast to defend your leader, Miranda.

This totally fits that Ms. APE opposed this. APE doesn't want the ankle bracelet kids near their snowflakes. APE doesn't want to share their shiny new building with anyone else. Could take away opportunies from APEs' kids. They don't like that.

Of course Turner is going to say its because plan is informed and not good for Langston kids. But we see through that. It's just like when they screamed OPEN UP NOOWWW during Covid claiming it was due to concern for low income hispanics or kids mental health or some other thing that sounded good. But of course they didn't care about those things - they were just convenient talking points.

oh girl. No. Langston folks have a great arguement.

oh girl. turner doesn't care about langston

I don’t think any of them do, if they did they wouldn’t have approved the move when the Langston community was expressing their concern.

+1 Langston families and teachers strongly opposed. The others should have voted no too.

I suspect that while this was put up for a vote they really did not have a choice. I don’t think the school board operates independently from Durán in any meaningful way. They are there to rubber stamp his agenda, occasionally expressing mild concern. I think when the budget is released we will see some fiscal advantages to this plan, though they swore that had nothing to do with it.

Anonymous wrote:Yeah and they had to vote before the budget is released which means not much time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Motion passed 4-1 to move Langston to Grace Hopper

Who opposed?

Turner

Why?

Someone will rush in and say it’s because she’s a republican evil APE but it’s an unformed plan and many kids are concerned about losing their small, supportive program.

Hi APE! You sure do jump in real fast to defend your leader, Miranda.

This totally fits that Ms. APE opposed this. APE doesn't want the ankle bracelet kids near their snowflakes. APE doesn't want to share their shiny new building with anyone else. Could take away opportunies from APEs' kids. They don't like that.

Of course Turner is going to say its because plan is informed and not good for Langston kids. But we see through that. It's just like when they screamed OPEN UP NOOWWW during Covid claiming it was due to concern for low income hispanics or kids mental health or some other thing that sounded good. But of course they didn't care about those things - they were just convenient talking points.

oh girl. No. Langston folks have a great arguement.

oh girl. turner doesn't care about langston

I don’t think any of them do, if they did they wouldn’t have approved the move when the Langston community was expressing their concern.

+1 Langston families and teachers strongly opposed. The others should have voted no too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Motion passed 4-1 to move Langston to Grace Hopper

It really was something to watch four of them say basically that the Langston students are concerned about losing their smsll, supportive program, the board had no details and were not sure how it is going to work but they’re voting yes. Don’t worry, they’re going to ask that the cabinet gives them updates! Meanwhile the school year starts in 6 months.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Motion passed 4-1 to move Langston to Grace Hopper

Who opposed?

Turner

Why?

Someone will rush in and say it’s because she’s a republican evil APE but it’s an unformed plan and many kids are concerned about losing their small, supportive program.

Hi APE! You sure do jump in real fast to defend your leader, Miranda.

This totally fits that Ms. APE opposed this. APE doesn't want the ankle bracelet kids near their snowflakes. APE doesn't want to share their shiny new building with anyone else. Could take away opportunies from APEs' kids. They don't like that.

Of course Turner is going to say its because plan is informed and not good for Langston kids. But we see through that. It's just like when they screamed OPEN UP NOOWWW during Covid claiming it was due to concern for low income hispanics or kids mental health or some other thing that sounded good. But of course they didn't care about those things - they were just convenient talking points.

oh girl. No. Langston folks have a great arguement.

oh girl. turner doesn't care about langston

I don’t think any of them do, if they did they wouldn’t have approved the move when the Langston community was expressing their concern.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Motion passed 4-1 to move Langston to Grace Hopper

Who opposed?

Turner

Why?

Someone will rush in and say it’s because she’s a republican evil APE but it’s an unformed plan and many kids are concerned about losing their small, supportive program.

Hi APE! You sure do jump in real fast to defend your leader, Miranda.

This totally fits that Ms. APE opposed this. APE doesn't want the ankle bracelet kids near their snowflakes. APE doesn't want to share their shiny new building with anyone else. Could take away opportunies from APEs' kids. They don't like that.

Of course Turner is going to say its because plan is informed and not good for Langston kids. But we see through that. It's just like when they screamed OPEN UP NOOWWW during Covid claiming it was due to concern for low income hispanics or kids mental health or some other thing that sounded good. But of course they didn't care about those things - they were just convenient talking points.

oh girl. No. Langston folks have a great arguement.

oh girl. turner doesn't care about langston

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Motion passed 4-1 to move Langston to Grace Hopper

Who opposed?

Turner

Why?

Someone will rush in and say it’s because she’s a republican evil APE but it’s an unformed plan and many kids are concerned about losing their small, supportive program.

Hi APE! You sure do jump in real fast to defend your leader, Miranda.

This totally fits that Ms. APE opposed this. APE doesn't want the ankle bracelet kids near their snowflakes. APE doesn't want to share their shiny new building with anyone else. Could take away opportunies from APEs' kids. They don't like that.

Of course Turner is going to say its because plan is informed and not good for Langston kids. But we see through that. It's just like when they screamed OPEN UP NOOWWW during Covid claiming it was due to concern for low income hispanics or kids mental health or some other thing that sounded good. But of course they didn't care about those things - they were just convenient talking points.

oh girl. No. Langston folks have a great arguement.