Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP again- details and timing of events have been changed, don’t get too worked up - I didn’t put much time into this but wanted it to be somewhat vague. Suffice to say, the relationship has not been great.
I mean, you came in here to poll people and presumably look for support for your own position, but I guess changed the details enough you could ignore everyone who disagrees with you. I would take a good look in the mirror.
It’s a new baby! That’s a happy thing. Little inconveniences that result are just part of life. Be happy for a healthy new baby in the world, if you can’t be happy for a new baby in your family.
Anonymous wrote:OP again- details and timing of events have been changed, don’t get too worked up - I didn’t put much time into this but wanted it to be somewhat vague. Suffice to say, the relationship has not been great.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think OP is “crazy” or “lying.” If you find this whole story weird or impossible to picture, consider yourself very very lucky.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think OP is “crazy” or “lying.” If you find this whole story weird or impossible to picture, consider yourself very very lucky.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A couple things:
*grandma should’ve told birthday party kid’s parents that she really hopes to come to the party and is honored to be invited but that *if* other daughter goes into labor/has baby early, she’ll probably have to go there instead. This way bday party kid’s parents know what to expect. …
Grandma is the one who messed up in this situation. And likely grandma is the reason the 3 adult kids don’t get along. Too bad.
I don’t feel like this is the kind of thing that needs to be said since it’s so obvious and any sister should be accommodating. The baby came early, and Grandma and sister have been estranged. She didn’t expect to be reached out and wants to make sure she accepts the peace offering. The grandkid will have a birthday every single year! She can do a FaceTime
with him to be there virtually when he cuts his cake etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, it is VERY telling that you have said not one word of excitement or care about your new niece or nephew. That precious baby is not guilty of doing or saying anything to hurt or manipulate you.
That’s a good point. She is just focused on the attention being taken away from her child on her child’s birthday- which sounds objectively childish and self centered. I don’t doubt that her sister is an attention seeker, but in this objective situation (even though OP clearly
Couldn’t tell the story objectively, it was obvious from the first post which sister she was and which sister she disliked), it’s a no brainer that the grandma should
Visit the newborn in the hospital.
No
She can go the next day.
And she can also visit the toddler the next day. The toddler will love a second birthday “celebration”. The newborn won’t be in the hospital the next day.
Why does the visit have to be at the hospital?
Is this an earnest question? If it is- visiting the new mom and baby at the hospital is often a big event, sort of a rite of passage. It would be uncommon for a grandparent to skip it for a birthday party. So uncommon, that if someone heard “oh her mom was going to come.l visit her and baby in the hospital but she’d already made plans”, it would immediately be assumed the grandma was aloof and uncaring .
It's really not a rite of passage though. And it would not be uncommon for a grandparent to come a day later in order to attend a gathering in honor of another grandkid she already committed to.
But if the new mom called her mom and asked her to come- after giving birth a month early!- it would in fact be unusual for the grandma to say no. For any reason. Neither daughter comes across as particularly pleasant IMO but the bottom line is, the birth of a new baby trumps a toddler birthday party under normal, non-dysfunctional circumstances.
It’s unusual to ice out your mother in your last trimester of pregnancy and then call and ask her to come on only one specific day. So lots of unusualness here.
Anonymous wrote:A couple things:
*grandma should’ve told birthday party kid’s parents that she really hopes to come to the party and is honored to be invited but that *if* other daughter goes into labor/has baby early, she’ll probably have to go there instead. This way bday party kid’s parents know what to expect. …
Grandma is the one who messed up in this situation. And likely grandma is the reason the 3 adult kids don’t get along. Too bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, it is VERY telling that you have said not one word of excitement or care about your new niece or nephew. That precious baby is not guilty of doing or saying anything to hurt or manipulate you.
That’s a good point. She is just focused on the attention being taken away from her child on her child’s birthday- which sounds objectively childish and self centered. I don’t doubt that her sister is an attention seeker, but in this objective situation (even though OP clearly
Couldn’t tell the story objectively, it was obvious from the first post which sister she was and which sister she disliked), it’s a no brainer that the grandma should
Visit the newborn in the hospital.
No
She can go the next day.
And she can also visit the toddler the next day. The toddler will love a second birthday “celebration”. The newborn won’t be in the hospital the next day.
Why does the visit have to be at the hospital?
Is this an earnest question? If it is- visiting the new mom and baby at the hospital is often a big event, sort of a rite of passage. It would be uncommon for a grandparent to skip it for a birthday party. So uncommon, that if someone heard “oh her mom was going to come.l visit her and baby in the hospital but she’d already made plans”, it would immediately be assumed the grandma was aloof and uncaring .
It's really not a rite of passage though. And it would not be uncommon for a grandparent to come a day later in order to attend a gathering in honor of another grandkid she already committed to.
But if the new mom called her mom and asked her to come- after giving birth a month early!- it would in fact be unusual for the grandma to say no. For any reason. Neither daughter comes across as particularly pleasant IMO but the bottom line is, the birth of a new baby trumps a toddler birthday party under normal, non-dysfunctional circumstances.
Not true
I am really surprised to see one or more people really thinking that if they were in the hospital, gave birth 3-4 weeks early, called their mom and said “please come visit us in the hospital tomorrow morning I just had the baby early!”…. that they’d be totally fine with their mom saying “oh well your sisters kid has his 3rd birthday celebration tomorrow and I did RSVP already so how about I skip the after birth visit and just see you once you get home the day after?” Because if that were me- in the hormonal , vulnerable state after having a baby- I’d have been crushed that my mother declined to come when I asked. Because of a toddler birthday party. On the other hand if I were the birthday mom and learned my sister had a baby, I would assume my mom (grandma) wouldn’t come to my party anymore and if she did, I’d be flabbergasted. It’s a toddler cake celebration! We can do another in a few days, which would thrill him anyways!
Continue to be flabbergasted. Id want my Mom to go to the party. The hell is she going to do for me and my perfectly healthy baby that can't be done the next day or the day after?
This, right here. Go to the party, come see me and baby after.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, it is VERY telling that you have said not one word of excitement or care about your new niece or nephew. That precious baby is not guilty of doing or saying anything to hurt or manipulate you.
That’s a good point. She is just focused on the attention being taken away from her child on her child’s birthday- which sounds objectively childish and self centered. I don’t doubt that her sister is an attention seeker, but in this objective situation (even though OP clearly
Couldn’t tell the story objectively, it was obvious from the first post which sister she was and which sister she disliked), it’s a no brainer that the grandma should
Visit the newborn in the hospital.
No
She can go the next day.
And she can also visit the toddler the next day. The toddler will love a second birthday “celebration”. The newborn won’t be in the hospital the next day.
Why does the visit have to be at the hospital?
Is this an earnest question? If it is- visiting the new mom and baby at the hospital is often a big event, sort of a rite of passage. It would be uncommon for a grandparent to skip it for a birthday party. So uncommon, that if someone heard “oh her mom was going to come.l visit her and baby in the hospital but she’d already made plans”, it would immediately be assumed the grandma was aloof and uncaring .
I don't think it's being universally true and it wasn't just vague plans it was a planned birthday party visit for her other grandchild.
Baby born early trumps a birthday party that occurs every year, especially for a child so young OP doesn’t even know if he will lnow grandma isn’t there.
Baby and mom are healthy. 3 weeks is not early.
Now you’re just being a troll.
Again someone disagreeing with you and giving facts doesn't make them a troll. According to op the baby was 3 weeks early , 37 weeks is considered full term. Also according to the op mom and baby were healthy. People are acting like this was an emergency and it wasn't.
I actually do think you are a troll because it’s just wild to be arguing that 3 weeks isn’t early. I mean, come on. You’re just trying to keep this debate going in bad faith at this point aka troll.
NP. I went into labor at 36/6 and my DS was born a few hours into starting week 37. Medical records list him as a full term birth (I noticed this because my second came even sooner and she is noted as preterm). This was within the past decade.
Regardless, I don’t think weeks matter. My 36/37 weekers came home without issue and I’ve known people with 38+ week babies who have had complications and required NICU treatment.
I guess I just don’t see why a visit with a newborn has to happen on a specific date and that date just *has* to be the other grandchild’s first birthday. But my parents live out of state so we’ve always had airfare logistics after ours were born. It didn’t feel like that big of a deal if my mom flew up on day 5 vs day 2 or whatever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, it is VERY telling that you have said not one word of excitement or care about your new niece or nephew. That precious baby is not guilty of doing or saying anything to hurt or manipulate you.
That’s a good point. She is just focused on the attention being taken away from her child on her child’s birthday- which sounds objectively childish and self centered. I don’t doubt that her sister is an attention seeker, but in this objective situation (even though OP clearly
Couldn’t tell the story objectively, it was obvious from the first post which sister she was and which sister she disliked), it’s a no brainer that the grandma should
Visit the newborn in the hospital.
No
She can go the next day.
And she can also visit the toddler the next day. The toddler will love a second birthday “celebration”. The newborn won’t be in the hospital the next day.
Why does the visit have to be at the hospital?
Is this an earnest question? If it is- visiting the new mom and baby at the hospital is often a big event, sort of a rite of passage. It would be uncommon for a grandparent to skip it for a birthday party. So uncommon, that if someone heard “oh her mom was going to come.l visit her and baby in the hospital but she’d already made plans”, it would immediately be assumed the grandma was aloof and uncaring .
It's really not a rite of passage though. And it would not be uncommon for a grandparent to come a day later in order to attend a gathering in honor of another grandkid she already committed to.
But if the new mom called her mom and asked her to come- after giving birth a month early!- it would in fact be unusual for the grandma to say no. For any reason. Neither daughter comes across as particularly pleasant IMO but the bottom line is, the birth of a new baby trumps a toddler birthday party under normal, non-dysfunctional circumstances.
Not true
I am really surprised to see one or more people really thinking that if they were in the hospital, gave birth 3-4 weeks early, called their mom and said “please come visit us in the hospital tomorrow morning I just had the baby early!”…. that they’d be totally fine with their mom saying “oh well your sisters kid has his 3rd birthday celebration tomorrow and I did RSVP already so how about I skip the after birth visit and just see you once you get home the day after?” Because if that were me- in the hormonal , vulnerable state after having a baby- I’d have been crushed that my mother declined to come when I asked. Because of a toddler birthday party. On the other hand if I were the birthday mom and learned my sister had a baby, I would assume my mom (grandma) wouldn’t come to my party anymore and if she did, I’d be flabbergasted. It’s a toddler cake celebration! We can do another in a few days, which would thrill him anyways!
Continue to be flabbergasted. Id want my Mom to go to the party. The hell is she going to do for me and my perfectly healthy baby that can't be done the next day or the day after?