Anonymous wrote:What’s so stupid about all of this is we already have de facto control of Greenland.
Anonymous wrote:This is unrelated to politics but I have never met a couple as sloppy as these two. JD shows up with a bloated, red face and sweating; Usha in a visibly pilly sweater...dear god. Isn't the GOP trying to push them on us as some young, trendy, cosmopolitan couple? "They love art, she was on the Board of the Cincinnati Opera, they go to nice restaurants in DC for date night"...okay. And they are still a-holes, and not even fashionable, good-looking a-holes at that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Wait wait wait. So JD Vance is out here telling Greenland that Denmark isn’t doing right by them (gosh do you think he suggests that someone else will?) at the same time the president is saying they’ll stop at nothing to take over Greenland. And at the very same time they’re sending the Second Lady over just for funsies to see a sled dog race? Not for like, either of the two aforementioned reasons? Do they think they’re being slick here?? Or do they realize it’s blindingly obvious to everyone else?
I think Trump's comments on Canada are just a bunch of late-night bluster. But I think the Administration is dead serious about Greenland. Realistically it would take a weekend for the US to invade and control Greenland - we already have a major base there to receive air transport, and Denmark's military would fold immediately. The EU would be livid and impose economic and diplomatic sanctions, but honestly they would be powerless to reverse the situation. My money is on military action in Greenland sometime in the next couple of years.
I think that if he tries that grandpa will get put in a home and Vance’s plane might have a mysterious malfunction.
One member of NATO invading another? I don't think that will go over well. Greenland is part of Denmark, and Denmark is in NATO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Wait wait wait. So JD Vance is out here telling Greenland that Denmark isn’t doing right by them (gosh do you think he suggests that someone else will?) at the same time the president is saying they’ll stop at nothing to take over Greenland. And at the very same time they’re sending the Second Lady over just for funsies to see a sled dog race? Not for like, either of the two aforementioned reasons? Do they think they’re being slick here?? Or do they realize it’s blindingly obvious to everyone else?
I think Trump's comments on Canada are just a bunch of late-night bluster. But I think the Administration is dead serious about Greenland. Realistically it would take a weekend for the US to invade and control Greenland - we already have a major base there to receive air transport, and Denmark's military would fold immediately. The EU would be livid and impose economic and diplomatic sanctions, but honestly they would be powerless to reverse the situation. My money is on military action in Greenland sometime in the next couple of years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Wait wait wait. So JD Vance is out here telling Greenland that Denmark isn’t doing right by them (gosh do you think he suggests that someone else will?) at the same time the president is saying they’ll stop at nothing to take over Greenland. And at the very same time they’re sending the Second Lady over just for funsies to see a sled dog race? Not for like, either of the two aforementioned reasons? Do they think they’re being slick here?? Or do they realize it’s blindingly obvious to everyone else?
I think Trump's comments on Canada are just a bunch of late-night bluster. But I think the Administration is dead serious about Greenland. Realistically it would take a weekend for the US to invade and control Greenland - we already have a major base there to receive air transport, and Denmark's military would fold immediately. The EU would be livid and impose economic and diplomatic sanctions, but honestly they would be powerless to reverse the situation. My money is on military action in Greenland sometime in the next couple of years.
I think that if he tries that grandpa will get put in a home and Vance’s plane might have a mysterious malfunction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Wait wait wait. So JD Vance is out here telling Greenland that Denmark isn’t doing right by them (gosh do you think he suggests that someone else will?) at the same time the president is saying they’ll stop at nothing to take over Greenland. And at the very same time they’re sending the Second Lady over just for funsies to see a sled dog race? Not for like, either of the two aforementioned reasons? Do they think they’re being slick here?? Or do they realize it’s blindingly obvious to everyone else?
I think Trump's comments on Canada are just a bunch of late-night bluster. But I think the Administration is dead serious about Greenland. Realistically it would take a weekend for the US to invade and control Greenland - we already have a major base there to receive air transport, and Denmark's military would fold immediately. The EU would be livid and impose economic and diplomatic sanctions, but honestly they would be powerless to reverse the situation. My money is on military action in Greenland sometime in the next couple of years.
Anonymous wrote:
Wait wait wait. So JD Vance is out here telling Greenland that Denmark isn’t doing right by them (gosh do you think he suggests that someone else will?) at the same time the president is saying they’ll stop at nothing to take over Greenland. And at the very same time they’re sending the Second Lady over just for funsies to see a sled dog race? Not for like, either of the two aforementioned reasons? Do they think they’re being slick here?? Or do they realize it’s blindingly obvious to everyone else?
Anonymous wrote:So when do we send the fleet? Next month?