Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any one else would describe the events as kidnapping if some one else was taken in this way
Just because you dislike what he was doing, doesn't change that fact.
Misusing the plain meaning of words doesn't help anything. An arrest by law enforcement may be legal, or illegal. It may be justified or not. It may be based on a warrant or upon probable cause. What is not is "kidnapping", by definition. If you redefine words to suit your politics, you simply reveal yourself as unserious, deluded, hysterical, and flat-out unbelievable.
He was taken
No one knew where he was
Other totalitarian regimes do this too and it's called kidnapping
English is not your native language, evident from many of your posts. Perhaps you can have someone help you write with greater clarity, using words correctly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL.
Seriously- this guy was a few steps away from driving a stolen Uber into Times Square.
He is getting off easy. Send him back to wherever and let IDF or one of our drones deal with him.
Left is getting worked up about an agitator looking for a fight - he will get it; just out of US.
This man was a Columbia graduate with an eight months pregnant wife.
This is terrifying and no wonder we have a terror problem at all with the mentality that you just mentioned.
What if you were taken from your home at random thanks to your religion? That used to happen to Jews not even 100 years ago you know. You’re supporting a Zionist Gestapo
No equivalence. He was arrested not at random but for his conduct, not his religious affiliation. His wife's pregnancy is irrelevant to anything, as is the fact he is married, or if he had 19 children already.
You may or may not think his conduct rises to the level of a deportable offense. That's a function of the conduct and the relevant law.
It's unhelpful to make patently unsupportable and clearly wrong claims about the basis for his detention.
Arrested without a warrant?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any one else would describe the events as kidnapping if some one else was taken in this way
Just because you dislike what he was doing, doesn't change that fact.
Misusing the plain meaning of words doesn't help anything. An arrest by law enforcement may be legal, or illegal. It may be justified or not. It may be based on a warrant or upon probable cause. What is not is "kidnapping", by definition. If you redefine words to suit your politics, you simply reveal yourself as unserious, deluded, hysterical, and flat-out unbelievable.
He was taken
No one knew where he was
Other totalitarian regimes do this too and it's called kidnapping
Anonymous wrote:I have not read this entire thread, but incitement to violence and threats are not protected free speech. So it will depend on what he said/did specifically, and encouraged others to do in terms of imminent action.
Anonymous wrote:LOL.
Seriously- this guy was a few steps away from driving a stolen Uber into Times Square.
He is getting off easy. Send him back to wherever and let IDF or one of our drones deal with him.
Left is getting worked up about an agitator looking for a fight - he will get it; just out of US.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When you are overtly advocating for violent terrorism, this is a risk. He was espousing terroristic activity. It’s literally a law.
Get your facts straight.
He never advocated for violent terrorism.
That is a LIE. Fox News told you that, right? Or Dumpus? Lies LIES LIES.
He's been arrested for exercising his First Amendment rights to speak his mind, his opinion.
DP. It's not nearly as clear cut as you suggest.
Khalil acted as a negotiator and sometimes spokesperson for CUAD (Columbia University Apartheid Divest).
CUAD explicitly and officially issued a statement supporting Hamas and 10/7. As quoted in the Times:
“We support liberation by any means necessary, including armed resistance,” the group, Columbia University Apartheid Divest, said in its statement revoking the apology.
The group marked the anniversary of the Oct. 7 attack on Israel by distributing a newspaper with a headline that used Hamas’s name for it: “One Year Since Al-Aqsa Flood, Revolution Until Victory,” it read, over a picture of Hamas fighters breaching the security fence to Israel. And the group posted an essay calling the attack a “moral, military and political victory” and quoting Ismail Haniyeh, the assassinated former political leader of Hamas.
“The Palestinian resistance is moving their struggle to a new phase of escalation and it is our duty to meet them there,” the group wrote on Oct. 7 on Telegram. “It is our duty to fight for our freedom!”
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/09/nyregion/columbia-pro-palestinian-group-hamas.html
That's pretty damning, honestly.
I hope the Democrats have enough sense not to jump into this.
Is it damning? I’m not sure if there is a law permitting deportation just for speech in support of a terrorist group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any one else would describe the events as kidnapping if some one else was taken in this way
Just because you dislike what he was doing, doesn't change that fact.
Misusing the plain meaning of words doesn't help anything. An arrest by law enforcement may be legal, or illegal. It may be justified or not. It may be based on a warrant or upon probable cause. What is not is "kidnapping", by definition. If you redefine words to suit your politics, you simply reveal yourself as unserious, deluded, hysterical, and flat-out unbelievable.
He was taken
No one knew where he was
Other totalitarian regimes do this too and it's called kidnapping
Can you start a new thread about the definition of kidnapping? Stop derailing this one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any one else would describe the events as kidnapping if some one else was taken in this way
Just because you dislike what he was doing, doesn't change that fact.
Misusing the plain meaning of words doesn't help anything. An arrest by law enforcement may be legal, or illegal. It may be justified or not. It may be based on a warrant or upon probable cause. What is not is "kidnapping", by definition. If you redefine words to suit your politics, you simply reveal yourself as unserious, deluded, hysterical, and flat-out unbelievable.
He was taken
No one knew where he was
Other totalitarian regimes do this too and it's called kidnapping
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL.
Seriously- this guy was a few steps away from driving a stolen Uber into Times Square.
He is getting off easy. Send him back to wherever and let IDF or one of our drones deal with him.
Left is getting worked up about an agitator looking for a fight - he will get it; just out of US.
This man was a Columbia graduate with an eight months pregnant wife.
This is terrifying and no wonder we have a terror problem at all with the mentality that you just mentioned.
What if you were taken from your home at random thanks to your religion? That used to happen to Jews not even 100 years ago you know. You’re supporting a Zionist Gestapo
No equivalence. He was arrested not at random but for his conduct, not his religious affiliation. His wife's pregnancy is irrelevant to anything, as is the fact he is married, or if he had 19 children already.
You may or may not think his conduct rises to the level of a deportable offense. That's a function of the conduct and the relevant law.
It's unhelpful to make patently unsupportable and clearly wrong claims about the basis for his detention.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL.
Seriously- this guy was a few steps away from driving a stolen Uber into Times Square.
He is getting off easy. Send him back to wherever and let IDF or one of our drones deal with him.
Left is getting worked up about an agitator looking for a fight - he will get it; just out of US.
Without a warrant?
This man was a Columbia graduate with an eight months pregnant wife.
This is terrifying and no wonder we have a terror problem at all with the mentality that you just mentioned.
What if you were taken from your home at random thanks to your religion? That used to happen to Jews not even 100 years ago you know. You’re supporting a Zionist Gestapo
No equivalence. He was arrested not at random but for his conduct, not his religious affiliation. His wife's pregnancy is irrelevant to anything, as is the fact he is married, or if he had 19 children already.
You may or may not think his conduct rises to the level of a deportable offense. That's a function of the conduct and the relevant law.
It's unhelpful to make patently unsupportable and clearly wrong claims about the basis for his detention.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any one else would describe the events as kidnapping if some one else was taken in this way
Just because you dislike what he was doing, doesn't change that fact.
Misusing the plain meaning of words doesn't help anything. An arrest by law enforcement may be legal, or illegal. It may be justified or not. It may be based on a warrant or upon probable cause. What is not is "kidnapping", by definition. If you redefine words to suit your politics, you simply reveal yourself as unserious, deluded, hysterical, and flat-out unbelievable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL.
Seriously- this guy was a few steps away from driving a stolen Uber into Times Square.
He is getting off easy. Send him back to wherever and let IDF or one of our drones deal with him.
Left is getting worked up about an agitator looking for a fight - he will get it; just out of US.
This man was a Columbia graduate with an eight months pregnant wife.
This is terrifying and no wonder we have a terror problem at all with the mentality that you just mentioned.
What if you were taken from your home at random thanks to your religion? That used to happen to Jews not even 100 years ago you know. You’re supporting a Zionist Gestapo
Anonymous wrote:Any one else would describe the events as kidnapping if some one else was taken in this way
Just because you dislike what he was doing, doesn't change that fact.