Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s sad to see Target going down like this.
It really is, but they did it to themselves.
I haven't shopped there in a year and nothing they can do will get me back, except for going full DEI like they were before. I do all the shopping for my family.
This white woman who also has a disability didn't take too kindly to having them crow about rolling back DEI for minorities, women and disabled people, as well as LGBT people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there any other reasons, other than the boycott, that profits are down? Curious if it’s from that alone.
No.
Same thing is happening with Home Depot versus Lowes.
Americans do not like supporting racists and thugs. In capitalism, we vote with our dollars.
Anonymous wrote:Are there any other reasons, other than the boycott, that profits are down? Curious if it’s from that alone.
Anonymous wrote:Are there any other reasons, other than the boycott, that profits are down? Curious if it’s from that alone.
Anonymous wrote:It’s sad to see Target going down like this.
Anonymous wrote:Are there any other reasons, other than the boycott, that profits are down? Curious if it’s from that alone.
Anonymous wrote:Are there any other reasons, other than the boycott, that profits are down? Curious if it’s from that alone.
Anonymous wrote:I'm going with yes, it's been effective. FAFO.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/target-cuts-earnings-guidance-warns-about-high-prices-and-predicts-a-weak-holiday-season-113001475.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think what companies are learning is to never try to appease the left. Target wouldn't be in this position if they'd stayed neutral.
Stores have a target audience(s). (Pun intended.) People who fall outside of that may still shop there. Target betrayed its primary audience. What’s so difficult to understand?
It's target audience is people looking to spend money. It's not a political organization. Liberals are not its target audience. Thanks for listening to my talk on capitalism.
Except…yes they were. Target positioned itself to be popular with liberals— contrasting itself to WalMart, paying marginally better, being overtly progressive, positioning itself in city centers.
If the people who care about those things stop shopping in your stores, well, it’s a long drive from the places people who don’t care about those things live and they don’t tend to have the same disposable income…
I'm telling you that this is a dumb business strategy, as Target has no doubt learned. They could have just continued to position themselves as a more upscale and fashionable Walmart and they would not have had this issue. Costco never did a fraction of the things that Target did to support the progressive movement, and which one of them is coming out on top? The moment you declare a business to have a political affiliation, you alienate half the population and then become entirely beholden to the other half, who will now have you by the balls. The left has Target by the balls and is hurting for it. The right hates it, the left finds its leftism insufficiently "authentic" and it's distracted from its central mission of supplying food and textiles.
Costco has long had the reputation that it treats its workers well, which is a core progressive value.
Treating workers well isn't politically controversial. Target never celebrated pride month. Not once. They do not sell products primarily targeted at trans people or at one minority race. They sell products with broad appeal and do not participate publicly in any identity months. Target was basically the epicenter of pride month and its advertising was overtly identity-politics based to appeal to progressives.
Any way you cut it, Target deciding to lean so far to the left has been disastrous. Other companies are now seeing the truth of "go woke, go broke." Once the progressives have a company in their vice grip, they will squeeze them til they break.