Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The season is in the books.

Takeaways?

I'm going to stick to VHSL teams only, PVI winning doesn't really say much about how good they are because VEL is not indicative of the kind of competition they will face in the Spring.

Indy: They are making the big move up to 6A this year. Their team is made up of up a couple of really solid players who were not at every game all fall. All that being said they did not win very many games, and obviously they had there fair share of drama both on the field and in this forum. My final takeaway for them is to cut out all the drama and lack of sportsmanship it only holds your team back.

Madison: Overall pretty good. A lot to make up for after the graduates from their 2024 class, which is a common theme across the top teams in the state. Their offense had looked solid all fall led by a group of good dodging lefty middies. However, something has to give with the goalie play, unlike last year I do not expect what they have in the net to cut it. Otherwise on defense they have looked okay, but Madison often has many defenders gone all fall for football.

Langley: Looked great. Had tough games against both private schools, but won all games against VHSL competition. Played good defense and by far had the best goalie play out of any public school in the Black division. Their offense has a lot of roles to fill, they did alright with the guys they had returning from last year but undoubtedly have a lot more work to do if they want to beat all these teams again in the spring.

Robinson: Looks alright in VEL. They also had questionable goalie play and again had a lot to replace after 2024 losses. Their poles looked very good in the games of theirs I saw, but I know they were missing their best d mids to football which hindered them this fall. The Robinson offense was disappointing to say the least, they lost as many guys as anyone and Coach Curran has a lot of work to do before the spring if they want to make a run like last year.

Yorktown: Not great. My understanding is they had a lot of guys gone for more of the season on defense so I don't want to judge too strong and they have a big role to replace in the net after graduating their guy from last year. The offense did seem to have a lot of their guys and it didn't look good, it seems to be all one guy taking most dodging and the entire offense runs through him. I do not think that is a sustainable offense in the spring, but I am sure coach Beer will figure something out by the spring.

In the end understand that this is just my opinion and you can only take away so much from VEL and fall lacrosse.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PVI v. Robinson - PVI by 12
Bishop Ireton v. Indy - BI by 5
Madison v. Langley - Madison by 1
Battlefield v. Yorktown - Battlefield by 2

PVI v. Robinson - PVI by 12 - You were close enough (+)
Bishop Ireton v. Indy - BI by 5- Swing and a miss (---)
Madison v. Langley - Madison by 1- Right score wrong winner (push)
Battlefield v. Yorktown - Battlefield by 2 - Nailed it (+++)

Overall grade +

Anonymous wrote:PVI vs Robo - PVI by 9
Langley > Madison by 3
Yorktown in braveheart
BI over Indy 7 to 5.

Anonymous wrote:PVI v. Robinson - PVI by 12
Bishop Ireton v. Indy - BI by 5
Madison v. Langley - Madison by 1
Battlefield v. Yorktown - Battlefield by 2

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The season is in the books.

Takeaways?

I'm going to stick to VHSL teams only, PVI winning doesn't really say much about how good they are because VEL is not indicative of the kind of competition they will face in the Spring.

Indy: They are making the big move up to 6A this year. Their team is made up of up a couple of really solid players who were not at every game all fall. All that being said they did not win very many games, and obviously they had there fair share of drama both on the field and in this forum. My final takeaway for them is to cut out all the drama and lack of sportsmanship it only holds your team back.

Madison: Overall pretty good. A lot to make up for after the graduates from their 2024 class, which is a common theme across the top teams in the state. Their offense had looked solid all fall led by a group of good dodging lefty middies. However, something has to give with the goalie play, unlike last year I do not expect what they have in the net to cut it. Otherwise on defense they have looked okay, but Madison often has many defenders gone all fall for football.

Langley: Looked great. Had tough games against both private schools, but won all games against VHSL competition. Played good defense and by far had the best goalie play out of any public school in the Black division. Their offense has a lot of roles to fill, they did alright with the guys they had returning from last year but undoubtedly have a lot more work to do if they want to beat all these teams again in the spring.

Robinson: Looks alright in VEL. They also had questionable goalie play and again had a lot to replace after 2024 losses. Their poles looked very good in the games of theirs I saw, but I know they were missing their best d mids to football which hindered them this fall. The Robinson offense was disappointing to say the least, they lost as many guys as anyone and Coach Curran has a lot of work to do before the spring if they want to make a run like last year.

Yorktown: Not great. My understanding is they had a lot of guys gone for more of the season on defense so I don't want to judge too strong and they have a big role to replace in the net after graduating their guy from last year. The offense did seem to have a lot of their guys and it didn't look good, it seems to be all one guy taking most dodging and the entire offense runs through him. I do not think that is a sustainable offense in the spring, but I am sure coach Beer will figure something out by the spring.

In the end understand that this is just my opinion and you can only take away so much from VEL and fall lacrosse.

Anonymous wrote:The season is in the books.

Takeaways?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The season is in the books.

Takeaways?

Sure. You can't take anything away from VEL beyond it was lacrosse. There are so many missing pieces from various teams because of fall sports. I it would be like taking away who should be in the World Series by who won the most spring training games. In case you were wondering - Dodgers won the cactus league with a record of 14-7. The Yankees won the Grapefruit league...oh, wait no they didn't they finished spring training with a record of 14-16.

If you want to talk about it. have at it but it means nothing to what goes on 6 months from now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The season is in the books.

Takeaways?

Sure. You can't take anything away from VEL beyond it was lacrosse. There are so many missing pieces from various teams because of fall sports. I it would be like taking away who should be in the World Series by who won the most spring training games. In case you were wondering - Dodgers won the cactus league with a record of 14-7. The Yankees won the Grapefruit league...oh, wait no they didn't they finished spring training with a record of 14-16.

If you want to talk about it. have at it but it means nothing to what goes on 6 months from now.

Anonymous wrote:The season is in the books.

Takeaways?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PVI vs Robo - PVI by 9
Langley > Madison by 3
Yorktown in braveheart
BI over Indy 7 to 5.

You think Indy will forfeit again?
Anyone know why they did a last minute no show last week?

Anonymous wrote:PVI vs Robo - PVI by 9
Langley > Madison by 3
Yorktown in braveheart
BI over Indy 7 to 5.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pendy didn’t even show versus Robinson today. VEL guys said that they called out 90 minutes before game start. How could they not get enough kids to get through a game when club season hasn’t started yet. Bad look when you get placed in the top division

why is everyone saying that Indy no-showed? the VEL website shows that the game was a 7-5 Robinson win.