It all smells like mob behavior. The Medinas wanted nothing to do with the Laci case, we’re freaked out by the media trucks by their house, and didn’t want to participate in the case or the search parties.

It smells like they owed someone some money and things had to be taken back (the safe). Laci was being perhaps a nosy neighbor and she was taken away by the mobsters and Deanna the friend pawned the watch and told them to get rid of her quickly

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Detective brocinni and the mobsters and Medinas were all mobbed up or something. It’s strange how they let the robbers go with a “polygraph”-I’m sure it was done by Broccini

Speaking of the mob Scott was a Sopranos fan and dumped Lacis body just like Tony and crew dumped Pussy in the water. He and Laci had watch parties. Probably where he got the idea. Roll the body in a bag, weight with concrete. Throw it over board, voila. Problem solved.

Half the country loved Sopranos. It’s more likely that Deanna Renfro and Detective Broccini are the mobsters and perhaps they thought of putting Laci and Connor months later on the shore.

It wasn’t found by someone fishing in the water or diving for a search. It was found by someone walking by.

How did it wash up on the shore out of the blue when it wasn’t found months earlier?

Broccini was in with this cover up.Who is this Deanna Renfro and who are the Medinas and Steven Todd? Why did they specifically want a safe from the Medina house? We’ll never find out

They didn’t ever answer who Deanna Renfro is. How did she end up with a watch just like Laci’s and why did she pawn it at the pawn shop on Dec 31st? She knew the Medinas next door and one of the burglars, Steven Todd. Did she set up the home invasion because she knew they were out of town?

Does Detective Broccini know Deanna Renfro?

Anonymous wrote:I think Detective brocinni and the mobsters and Medinas were all mobbed up or something. It’s strange how they let the robbers go with a “polygraph”-I’m sure it was done by Broccini

Speaking of the mob Scott was a Sopranos fan and dumped Lacis body just like Tony and crew dumped Pussy in the water. He and Laci had watch parties. Probably where he got the idea. Roll the body in a bag, weight with concrete. Throw it over board, voila. Problem solved.

I think Detective brocinni and the mobsters and Medinas were all mobbed up or something. It’s strange how they let the robbers go with a “polygraph”-I’m sure it was done by Broccini

Anonymous wrote:Trailing dogs kept heading South toward the burglar van’s direction instead of North toward Scott’s warehouse where he had the boat.

Besides Laci’s watch, there also is the mystery of the safe stolen by burglars from the Medina house on 12/24. Geragos wanted to test the safe for Laci’s fingerprint or DNA to see if she touched it in the van and the Modesto police got rid of the safe entirely as stolen property from the Medina house. They didn’t want to give it up for the defense to test.

Modesto PD probably knows the burglars killed Laci but they wanted Scott to go to jail

Do you know this case was over 20 years ago? You’re acting like its in real time.

Trailing dogs kept heading South toward the burglar van’s direction instead of North toward Scott’s warehouse where he had the boat.

Besides Laci’s watch, there also is the mystery of the safe stolen by burglars from the Medina house on 12/24. Geragos wanted to test the safe for Laci’s fingerprint or DNA to see if she touched it in the van and the Modesto police got rid of the safe entirely as stolen property from the Medina house. They didn’t want to give it up for the defense to test.

Modesto PD probably knows the burglars killed Laci but they wanted Scott to go to jail

Anonymous wrote:The state didn’t prove its case. Lots of reasonable doubt and holes in the case

Hmmm pretty sure everyone else disagrees.

The state didn’t prove its case. Lots of reasonable doubt and holes in the case

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/laci-judge-keep-autopsy-sealed/

The judge ruled Friday that an autopsy report on the deaths of Laci Peterson and her unborn son should remain sealed along with other search warrant and arrest records.

Superior Court Judge Al Girolami said releasing the information could hamper the murder investigation and prejudice public opinion before a trial begins.

Girolami is scheduled to hear more arguments June 6 from prosecutors preparing a murder case against Peterson's husband, Scott Peterson. Prosecutors on Thursday asked that the autopsy reports be released to the public. They argued that media leaks of the reports are biased toward the defense.

Contra Costa County authorities concluded their autopsy report earlier this month, but did not disclose the cause of death.


How would autopsy reports bias toward the defense when the entire world thought Scott did it?

How do you get a life in prison without parole and death penalty sentence for no cause of death, no time of death, no date of death, and no autopsy records or search warrant records allowed?

They didn’t even test the dogs leash or collar for fingerprints. The dogs collar was muddy when the neighbor said she found it out in the street. How did Lacis dog find its way home? It means Laci was probably kidnapped across the street during the burglary. Why would Scott let the dog loose on the street after just killing Laci?

Why is the DA’s office and state of California fighting attempts to DNA test Laci and Conner and the burned van found close to the Paterson home on Christmas Day? The bloody mattress in the van was ignored.

Why wasn’t that watch at the pawn shop tested for the burglars fingerprints? That watch was Laci’s. There’s no EBay transaction showing Laci sold that and Scott and family said that was a special watch from Lacis grandmother and she’d never sell that one.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a woman and I don’t think he did it.

I don't see how you can reasonable conclude this. On any level whatsoever.

How? Cops have the ability to determine our innocence and guilt on a dime and plant evidence in or against our favor. The cops happened to like the burglars more than they liked Scott so Scott went to jail and they didn’t

Or maybe the cops, like everyone reasonable realized that the lying con man ready to flee to Mexico clearly did it. It wasn’t some satanic cult, or random burglars, it was the husband like it almost always is. Scott was just the type and all his behavior points toward his guilt.

Behavior is not an arbiter of guilt. What does acting guilty even mean? He didn’t know he was supposed to grieve on the 24th when he met cops. He thought Laci was still alive. They all did. Laci’s family thought she was alive too. He asked the cops if they should search hospitals because the Peterson and Rocha families assumed she went into labor prematurely.

Yes, it most certainly is.

No it isn’t and a policeman’s job is not to presume anything but find the body and then run the forensic tests. Dental records especially are a huge clue in most homicide cases. The crime scene and the fact a noose was tied on baby connors neck was assumed to be from debris but how does a knot with a bow tie get tied in the water? That’s a handmade knot. There are details like that they ignored. We don’t know if Laci was lactating, if she was raped or SA’d, if the baby ate, if Laci was wearing clothes from her house, what happened to her watch. They did nothing with the actual evidence.

They just wanted Scott to go to jail because he gave them a cup of water with a coaster and didn’t cry.

Scott told the cops exactly Where he went fishing that afternoon. Why would a murderer tell cops where he placed a body?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure why everyone is grasping at the Martha Stewart segment proving him innocent.

Did you know - at the end of the previous show, they have a "what's on the next show!" preview. He could have literally watched the show the day before, and knew the next one was going to be about cookies and meringue. He could have watched the intro to the show, where Martha says what she will be making on that day. He could have even looked it up after to see what she made. This proves literally nothing.

+1

More interesting facts pointing at his guilt are his going "phew!" when he learned her body had not initially been found in the bay, his telling his girlfriend that his wife was "missing" BEFORE she went missing and oh yeah, dying his hair, beard, having $15k cash in the car and his brother's id. en route to Mexico.

Hum...

Lacis parents were also relieved. I think you forget that literally everyone that she was alive. The Modesto residents claimed it was a city with virtually no homicides or crime so everyone thought it was a kidnapping like Elizabeth Smart.

Of course he would be relieved she wasn’t found dead in the water. He wanted Laci to be found alive. She probably could’ve if cops focused on the kidnapping tipsters

Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure why everyone is grasping at the Martha Stewart segment proving him innocent.

Did you know - at the end of the previous show, they have a "what's on the next show!" preview. He could have literally watched the show the day before, and knew the next one was going to be about cookies and meringue. He could have watched the intro to the show, where Martha says what she will be making on that day. He could have even looked it up after to see what she made. This proves literally nothing.

+1

More interesting facts pointing at his guilt are his going "phew!" when he learned her body had not initially been found in the bay, his telling his girlfriend that his wife was "missing" BEFORE she went missing and oh yeah, dying his hair, beard, having $15k cash in the car and his brother's id. en route to Mexico.

Hum...