Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would O.J. have cuts on his hand without cuts on the glove?

The glove looked pristine and brand new not like it went through double murder. The bloody leather glove was as shiny as a Michael Jackson’s and so obviously planted by Furhman. It was not in ruins consistent with the amount of blood found on it or OJ’s cuts or Ron’s defensive wounds.

Ego is a terrible thing. People don’t want to admit the prosecution’s evidence made no sense

It made perfect sense. The prosecution had a great case, but oj’s lawyers we’re better, the jury believed the case would be about helping out a black man that was charming, etc.
You really can’t be this delusional. It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact- Oj killed them. His own agent and Oj’s lawyers knew it too, but you can live in fantasy land if you want too

It’s not a fact OJ killed them. The smoking gun is the blood and OJ’s blood went missing from a lab . We aren’t sure that wasn’t planted because the lead detective has a history of planting evidence on black men .

Here’s a 1995 article about the missing blood. The prison nurse had to lie and say he only withdrew 6.7 mm of blood when he later said he was sure his initial testimony that it was 8 mm was correct because he withdrew that amount his entire career and it is an even number

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/06/us/witness-tries-to-explain-missing-simpson-blood.html

Have you researched any of this case at all. Oj was in Chicago so getting his blood to plant was an impossibility. They had no way of getting his blood because he wasn’t in town.
I loved the naked gun movies, too but he murdered two people. Go listen to the Oj interrogation, interviews he did(Chris Myers interview was riveting)

Jesus Christ, Chicago was in the immediate aftermath of the murders before a crime scene and investigation had been set up.

Once OJ was arrested for murders and in jail, he did get blood drawn stupidly to “clear his name” and get out of jail because the cops told him to do so help the investigation. Some of the 8mm blood in the vial collected by prison nurse Thano Peratis “went missing”. About 1-2 mm disappeared. Thano, under pressure, changed his testimony to say maybe he only withdrew 6-7 instead of 8mm to account for the missing blood. The defense said Furhman with his history likely took this missing blood and planted it on the gloves, car, and socks that OJ , (because he was prudent enough to wear gloves but leave it behind), left sloppily on the scene. Ron’s blood being found in the Bronco and anything else that was used as evidence was not enough to convict Oj beyond reasonable doubt because Fuhrman plead the fifth when asked if he tampered with the scene per his history . This is why the case tanked . There is no real proof we can be certain about because the detective who was a racist had carte Blanche to handle the crime scene and all its DNA evidence .

Here’s an article about Thano Peratis changing his testimony to account for the missing blood.

https://www.upi.com/amp/Archives/1996/12/10/OJ-nurse-changes-testimony/5632850194000/

Jesus Christ, the crime scene (where OJs blood was also found to the left of Bruno Magli footprints and what do you know a finger on OJs left hand was sliced open) was secured and processed before OJ returned from Chicago and started giving blood. OJs house (to include his Bronco) was also secured and searched before OJ returned home and started giving blood. The FBI also contradicted the defense hired gun expert regarding the EDTA issue.

He had a cut on his finger but the glove didn’t have tears on the fingers.

Yes genius, because the glove obviously came off for it to be left at the crime scene. Are people really this stupid?!

So you believe OJ was aware enough to wear a glove, but was dumb enough to leave the blood soaked glove where the dog could retrieve it and take it elsewhere ? He did this while his kids were asleep upstairs.

The glove wasn’t planted by the cops because Furhman loved OJ so much and suddenly changed and decided not to plant evidence as he usually did with AA males?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP with the blood draw is nuts. Has s/he never had her blood drawn? I have, many times, and it is never ever the kind of precise process claimed.

EDTA was found on the scene. Did OJ moonlight as a phlebotomist? How would this chemical preservative/ clearing agent appear on OJ’s socks?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would O.J. have cuts on his hand without cuts on the glove?

The glove looked pristine and brand new not like it went through double murder. The bloody leather glove was as shiny as a Michael Jackson’s and so obviously planted by Furhman. It was not in ruins consistent with the amount of blood found on it or OJ’s cuts or Ron’s defensive wounds.

Ego is a terrible thing. People don’t want to admit the prosecution’s evidence made no sense

It made perfect sense. The prosecution had a great case, but oj’s lawyers we’re better, the jury believed the case would be about helping out a black man that was charming, etc.
You really can’t be this delusional. It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact- Oj killed them. His own agent and Oj’s lawyers knew it too, but you can live in fantasy land if you want too

It’s not a fact OJ killed them. The smoking gun is the blood and OJ’s blood went missing from a lab . We aren’t sure that wasn’t planted because the lead detective has a history of planting evidence on black men .

Here’s a 1995 article about the missing blood. The prison nurse had to lie and say he only withdrew 6.7 mm of blood when he later said he was sure his initial testimony that it was 8 mm was correct because he withdrew that amount his entire career and it is an even number

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/06/us/witness-tries-to-explain-missing-simpson-blood.html

Have you researched any of this case at all. Oj was in Chicago so getting his blood to plant was an impossibility. They had no way of getting his blood because he wasn’t in town.
I loved the naked gun movies, too but he murdered two people. Go listen to the Oj interrogation, interviews he did(Chris Myers interview was riveting)

Jesus Christ, Chicago was in the immediate aftermath of the murders before a crime scene and investigation had been set up.

Once OJ was arrested for murders and in jail, he did get blood drawn stupidly to “clear his name” and get out of jail because the cops told him to do so help the investigation. Some of the 8mm blood in the vial collected by prison nurse Thano Peratis “went missing”. About 1-2 mm disappeared. Thano, under pressure, changed his testimony to say maybe he only withdrew 6-7 instead of 8mm to account for the missing blood. The defense said Furhman with his history likely took this missing blood and planted it on the gloves, car, and socks that OJ , (because he was prudent enough to wear gloves but leave it behind), left sloppily on the scene. Ron’s blood being found in the Bronco and anything else that was used as evidence was not enough to convict Oj beyond reasonable doubt because Fuhrman plead the fifth when asked if he tampered with the scene per his history . This is why the case tanked . There is no real proof we can be certain about because the detective who was a racist had carte Blanche to handle the crime scene and all its DNA evidence .

Here’s an article about Thano Peratis changing his testimony to account for the missing blood.

https://www.upi.com/amp/Archives/1996/12/10/OJ-nurse-changes-testimony/5632850194000/

Jesus Christ, the crime scene (where OJs blood was also found to the left of Bruno Magli footprints and what do you know a finger on OJs left hand was sliced open) was secured and processed before OJ returned from Chicago and started giving blood. OJs house (to include his Bronco) was also secured and searched before OJ returned home and started giving blood. The FBI also contradicted the defense hired gun expert regarding the EDTA issue.

He had a cut on his finger but the glove didn’t have tears on the fingers.

Yes genius, because the glove obviously came off for it to be left at the crime scene. Are people really this stupid?!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would O.J. have cuts on his hand without cuts on the glove?

The glove looked pristine and brand new not like it went through double murder. The bloody leather glove was as shiny as a Michael Jackson’s and so obviously planted by Furhman. It was not in ruins consistent with the amount of blood found on it or OJ’s cuts or Ron’s defensive wounds.

Ego is a terrible thing. People don’t want to admit the prosecution’s evidence made no sense

It made perfect sense. The prosecution had a great case, but oj’s lawyers we’re better, the jury believed the case would be about helping out a black man that was charming, etc.
You really can’t be this delusional. It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact- Oj killed them. His own agent and Oj’s lawyers knew it too, but you can live in fantasy land if you want too

It’s not a fact OJ killed them. The smoking gun is the blood and OJ’s blood went missing from a lab . We aren’t sure that wasn’t planted because the lead detective has a history of planting evidence on black men .

Here’s a 1995 article about the missing blood. The prison nurse had to lie and say he only withdrew 6.7 mm of blood when he later said he was sure his initial testimony that it was 8 mm was correct because he withdrew that amount his entire career and it is an even number

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/06/us/witness-tries-to-explain-missing-simpson-blood.html

Have you researched any of this case at all. Oj was in Chicago so getting his blood to plant was an impossibility. They had no way of getting his blood because he wasn’t in town.
I loved the naked gun movies, too but he murdered two people. Go listen to the Oj interrogation, interviews he did(Chris Myers interview was riveting)

Jesus Christ, Chicago was in the immediate aftermath of the murders before a crime scene and investigation had been set up.

Once OJ was arrested for murders and in jail, he did get blood drawn stupidly to “clear his name” and get out of jail because the cops told him to do so help the investigation. Some of the 8mm blood in the vial collected by prison nurse Thano Peratis “went missing”. About 1-2 mm disappeared. Thano, under pressure, changed his testimony to say maybe he only withdrew 6-7 instead of 8mm to account for the missing blood. The defense said Furhman with his history likely took this missing blood and planted it on the gloves, car, and socks that OJ , (because he was prudent enough to wear gloves but leave it behind), left sloppily on the scene. Ron’s blood being found in the Bronco and anything else that was used as evidence was not enough to convict Oj beyond reasonable doubt because Fuhrman plead the fifth when asked if he tampered with the scene per his history . This is why the case tanked . There is no real proof we can be certain about because the detective who was a racist had carte Blanche to handle the crime scene and all its DNA evidence .

Here’s an article about Thano Peratis changing his testimony to account for the missing blood.

https://www.upi.com/amp/Archives/1996/12/10/OJ-nurse-changes-testimony/5632850194000/

That little amount of blood would not have “soaked” the items in blood.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would O.J. have cuts on his hand without cuts on the glove?

The glove looked pristine and brand new not like it went through double murder. The bloody leather glove was as shiny as a Michael Jackson’s and so obviously planted by Furhman. It was not in ruins consistent with the amount of blood found on it or OJ’s cuts or Ron’s defensive wounds.

Ego is a terrible thing. People don’t want to admit the prosecution’s evidence made no sense

It made perfect sense. The prosecution had a great case, but oj’s lawyers we’re better, the jury believed the case would be about helping out a black man that was charming, etc.
You really can’t be this delusional. It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact- Oj killed them. His own agent and Oj’s lawyers knew it too, but you can live in fantasy land if you want too

It’s not a fact OJ killed them. The smoking gun is the blood and OJ’s blood went missing from a lab . We aren’t sure that wasn’t planted because the lead detective has a history of planting evidence on black men .

Here’s a 1995 article about the missing blood. The prison nurse had to lie and say he only withdrew 6.7 mm of blood when he later said he was sure his initial testimony that it was 8 mm was correct because he withdrew that amount his entire career and it is an even number

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/06/us/witness-tries-to-explain-missing-simpson-blood.html

Have you researched any of this case at all. Oj was in Chicago so getting his blood to plant was an impossibility. They had no way of getting his blood because he wasn’t in town.
I loved the naked gun movies, too but he murdered two people. Go listen to the Oj interrogation, interviews he did(Chris Myers interview was riveting)

Jesus Christ, Chicago was in the immediate aftermath of the murders before a crime scene and investigation had been set up.

Once OJ was arrested for murders and in jail, he did get blood drawn stupidly to “clear his name” and get out of jail because the cops told him to do so help the investigation. Some of the 8mm blood in the vial collected by prison nurse Thano Peratis “went missing”. About 1-2 mm disappeared. Thano, under pressure, changed his testimony to say maybe he only withdrew 6-7 instead of 8mm to account for the missing blood. The defense said Furhman with his history likely took this missing blood and planted it on the gloves, car, and socks that OJ , (because he was prudent enough to wear gloves but leave it behind), left sloppily on the scene. Ron’s blood being found in the Bronco and anything else that was used as evidence was not enough to convict Oj beyond reasonable doubt because Fuhrman plead the fifth when asked if he tampered with the scene per his history . This is why the case tanked . There is no real proof we can be certain about because the detective who was a racist had carte Blanche to handle the crime scene and all its DNA evidence .

Here’s an article about Thano Peratis changing his testimony to account for the missing blood.

https://www.upi.com/amp/Archives/1996/12/10/OJ-nurse-changes-testimony/5632850194000/

Jesus Christ, the crime scene (where OJs blood was also found to the left of Bruno Magli footprints and what do you know a finger on OJs left hand was sliced open) was secured and processed before OJ returned from Chicago and started giving blood. OJs house (to include his Bronco) was also secured and searched before OJ returned home and started giving blood. The FBI also contradicted the defense hired gun expert regarding the EDTA issue.

He had a cut on his finger but the glove didn’t have tears on the fingers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would O.J. have cuts on his hand without cuts on the glove?

The glove looked pristine and brand new not like it went through double murder. The bloody leather glove was as shiny as a Michael Jackson’s and so obviously planted by Furhman. It was not in ruins consistent with the amount of blood found on it or OJ’s cuts or Ron’s defensive wounds.

Ego is a terrible thing. People don’t want to admit the prosecution’s evidence made no sense

It made perfect sense. The prosecution had a great case, but oj’s lawyers we’re better, the jury believed the case would be about helping out a black man that was charming, etc.
You really can’t be this delusional. It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact- Oj killed them. His own agent and Oj’s lawyers knew it too, but you can live in fantasy land if you want too

It’s not a fact OJ killed them. The smoking gun is the blood and OJ’s blood went missing from a lab . We aren’t sure that wasn’t planted because the lead detective has a history of planting evidence on black men .

Here’s a 1995 article about the missing blood. The prison nurse had to lie and say he only withdrew 6.7 mm of blood when he later said he was sure his initial testimony that it was 8 mm was correct because he withdrew that amount his entire career and it is an even number

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/06/us/witness-tries-to-explain-missing-simpson-blood.html

Have you researched any of this case at all. Oj was in Chicago so getting his blood to plant was an impossibility. They had no way of getting his blood because he wasn’t in town.
I loved the naked gun movies, too but he murdered two people. Go listen to the Oj interrogation, interviews he did(Chris Myers interview was riveting)

Jesus Christ, Chicago was in the immediate aftermath of the murders before a crime scene and investigation had been set up.

Once OJ was arrested for murders and in jail, he did get blood drawn stupidly to “clear his name” and get out of jail because the cops told him to do so help the investigation. Some of the 8mm blood in the vial collected by prison nurse Thano Peratis “went missing”. About 1-2 mm disappeared. Thano, under pressure, changed his testimony to say maybe he only withdrew 6-7 instead of 8mm to account for the missing blood. The defense said Furhman with his history likely took this missing blood and planted it on the gloves, car, and socks that OJ , (because he was prudent enough to wear gloves but leave it behind), left sloppily on the scene. Ron’s blood being found in the Bronco and anything else that was used as evidence was not enough to convict Oj beyond reasonable doubt because Fuhrman plead the fifth when asked if he tampered with the scene per his history . This is why the case tanked . There is no real proof we can be certain about because the detective who was a racist had carte Blanche to handle the crime scene and all its DNA evidence .

Here’s an article about Thano Peratis changing his testimony to account for the missing blood.

https://www.upi.com/amp/Archives/1996/12/10/OJ-nurse-changes-testimony/5632850194000/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would O.J. have cuts on his hand without cuts on the glove?

The glove looked pristine and brand new not like it went through double murder. The bloody leather glove was as shiny as a Michael Jackson’s and so obviously planted by Furhman. It was not in ruins consistent with the amount of blood found on it or OJ’s cuts or Ron’s defensive wounds.

Ego is a terrible thing. People don’t want to admit the prosecution’s evidence made no sense

It made perfect sense. The prosecution had a great case, but oj’s lawyers we’re better, the jury believed the case would be about helping out a black man that was charming, etc.
You really can’t be this delusional. It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact- Oj killed them. His own agent and Oj’s lawyers knew it too, but you can live in fantasy land if you want too

It’s not a fact OJ killed them. The smoking gun is the blood and OJ’s blood went missing from a lab . We aren’t sure that wasn’t planted because the lead detective has a history of planting evidence on black men .

Here’s a 1995 article about the missing blood. The prison nurse had to lie and say he only withdrew 6.7 mm of blood when he later said he was sure his initial testimony that it was 8 mm was correct because he withdrew that amount his entire career and it is an even number

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/06/us/witness-tries-to-explain-missing-simpson-blood.html

Have you researched any of this case at all. Oj was in Chicago so getting his blood to plant was an impossibility. They had no way of getting his blood because he wasn’t in town.
I loved the naked gun movies, too but he murdered two people. Go listen to the Oj interrogation, interviews he did(Chris Myers interview was riveting)

Jesus Christ, Chicago was in the immediate aftermath of the murders before a crime scene and investigation had been set up.

Once OJ was arrested for murders and in jail, he did get blood drawn stupidly to “clear his name” and get out of jail because the cops told him to do so help the investigation. Some of the 8mm blood in the vial collected by prison nurse Thano Peratis “went missing”. About 1-2 mm disappeared. Thano, under pressure, changed his testimony to say maybe he only withdrew 6-7 instead of 8mm to account for the missing blood. The defense said Furhman with his history likely took this missing blood and planted it on the gloves, car, and socks that OJ , (because he was prudent enough to wear gloves but leave it behind), left sloppily on the scene. Ron’s blood being found in the Bronco and anything else that was used as evidence was not enough to convict Oj beyond reasonable doubt because Fuhrman plead the fifth when asked if he tampered with the scene per his history . This is why the case tanked . There is no real proof we can be certain about because the detective who was a racist had carte Blanche to handle the crime scene and all its DNA evidence .

Here’s an article about Thano Peratis changing his testimony to account for the missing blood.

https://www.upi.com/amp/Archives/1996/12/10/OJ-nurse-changes-testimony/5632850194000/

Jesus Christ, the crime scene (where OJs blood was also found to the left of Bruno Magli footprints and what do you know a finger on OJs left hand was sliced open) was secured and processed before OJ returned from Chicago and started giving blood. OJs house (to include his Bronco) was also secured and searched before OJ returned home and started giving blood. The FBI also contradicted the defense hired gun expert regarding the EDTA issue.

He had a cut on his finger but the glove didn’t have tears on the fingers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mark Furhman was known for planting drugs on African American men. The blood evidence in the case could All be planted which is why OJ wasn’t found guilty . Only an idiot would wear gloves to not leave a trace and then leave the bloody glove at the scene in a panic . That defeats the purpose . Such a scene would only happen if it were an unintended crime of passion but why bring gloves in LA in June ?

These facts and more are why the case fell apart

OJ was found not guilty because there were enough jury members who were glad he killed her.

They have said this out loud on camera, there is no reason to pretend it's not true.

It is well documented that Cochran's pre-jury selection research demonstrated he could find jurors like that.

Link? Any person making such an inflammatory statement about a victim would be disqualified from the jury .

If the jurors were all white, I still believe OJ would have walked ala Michael
Jackson in Santa Barbara. Furhman messed up things and his defense was too good. I know people hate Cochran , Kardashian, and Dershowitz and say their cancers were karma but they were darn good

You’re asking for a link to the six-hour documentary and post-trial memoirs of the lawyers? Cochran had to be persuaded to adopt his eventual jury-selection strategy. (He wanted one gender and was convinced by the consultants why the other was better).

No, I am asking for the link to jurors saying they’re glad Nicole was dead. There’s lots of projection going on here.

I still think if the jury was all white, OJ would’ve been found innocent. The prosecution and detective /LAPD did a horrible job

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would O.J. have cuts on his hand without cuts on the glove?

The glove looked pristine and brand new not like it went through double murder. The bloody leather glove was as shiny as a Michael Jackson’s and so obviously planted by Furhman. It was not in ruins consistent with the amount of blood found on it or OJ’s cuts or Ron’s defensive wounds.

Ego is a terrible thing. People don’t want to admit the prosecution’s evidence made no sense

It made perfect sense. The prosecution had a great case, but oj’s lawyers we’re better, the jury believed the case would be about helping out a black man that was charming, etc.
You really can’t be this delusional. It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact- Oj killed them. His own agent and Oj’s lawyers knew it too, but you can live in fantasy land if you want too

It’s not a fact OJ killed them. The smoking gun is the blood and OJ’s blood went missing from a lab . We aren’t sure that wasn’t planted because the lead detective has a history of planting evidence on black men .

Here’s a 1995 article about the missing blood. The prison nurse had to lie and say he only withdrew 6.7 mm of blood when he later said he was sure his initial testimony that it was 8 mm was correct because he withdrew that amount his entire career and it is an even number

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/06/us/witness-tries-to-explain-missing-simpson-blood.html

Have you researched any of this case at all. Oj was in Chicago so getting his blood to plant was an impossibility. They had no way of getting his blood because he wasn’t in town.
I loved the naked gun movies, too but he murdered two people. Go listen to the Oj interrogation, interviews he did(Chris Myers interview was riveting)

Jesus Christ, Chicago was in the immediate aftermath of the murders before a crime scene and investigation had been set up.

Once OJ was arrested for murders and in jail, he did get blood drawn stupidly to “clear his name” and get out of jail because the cops told him to do so help the investigation. Some of the 8mm blood in the vial collected by prison nurse Thano Peratis “went missing”. About 1-2 mm disappeared. Thano, under pressure, changed his testimony to say maybe he only withdrew 6-7 instead of 8mm to account for the missing blood. The defense said Furhman with his history likely took this missing blood and planted it on the gloves, car, and socks that OJ , (because he was prudent enough to wear gloves but leave it behind), left sloppily on the scene. Ron’s blood being found in the Bronco and anything else that was used as evidence was not enough to convict Oj beyond reasonable doubt because Fuhrman plead the fifth when asked if he tampered with the scene per his history . This is why the case tanked . There is no real proof we can be certain about because the detective who was a racist had carte Blanche to handle the crime scene and all its DNA evidence .

Here’s an article about Thano Peratis changing his testimony to account for the missing blood.

https://www.upi.com/amp/Archives/1996/12/10/OJ-nurse-changes-testimony/5632850194000/

Jesus Christ, the crime scene (where OJs blood was also found to the left of Bruno Magli footprints and what do you know a finger on OJs left hand was sliced open) was secured and processed before OJ returned from Chicago and started giving blood. OJs house (to include his Bronco) was also secured and searched before OJ returned home and started giving blood. The FBI also contradicted the defense hired gun expert regarding the EDTA issue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would O.J. have cuts on his hand without cuts on the glove?

The glove looked pristine and brand new not like it went through double murder. The bloody leather glove was as shiny as a Michael Jackson’s and so obviously planted by Furhman. It was not in ruins consistent with the amount of blood found on it or OJ’s cuts or Ron’s defensive wounds.

Ego is a terrible thing. People don’t want to admit the prosecution’s evidence made no sense

It made perfect sense. The prosecution had a great case, but oj’s lawyers we’re better, the jury believed the case would be about helping out a black man that was charming, etc.
You really can’t be this delusional. It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact- Oj killed them. His own agent and Oj’s lawyers knew it too, but you can live in fantasy land if you want too

It’s not a fact OJ killed them. The smoking gun is the blood and OJ’s blood went missing from a lab . We aren’t sure that wasn’t planted because the lead detective has a history of planting evidence on black men .

Here’s a 1995 article about the missing blood. The prison nurse had to lie and say he only withdrew 6.7 mm of blood when he later said he was sure his initial testimony that it was 8 mm was correct because he withdrew that amount his entire career and it is an even number

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/06/us/witness-tries-to-explain-missing-simpson-blood.html

Have you researched any of this case at all. Oj was in Chicago so getting his blood to plant was an impossibility. They had no way of getting his blood because he wasn’t in town.
I loved the naked gun movies, too but he murdered two people. Go listen to the Oj interrogation, interviews he did(Chris Myers interview was riveting)

Jesus Christ, Chicago was in the immediate aftermath of the murders before a crime scene and investigation had been set up.

Once OJ was arrested for murders and in jail, he did get blood drawn stupidly to “clear his name” and get out of jail because the cops told him to do so help the investigation. Some of the 8mm blood in the vial collected by prison nurse Thano Peratis “went missing”. About 1-2 mm disappeared. Thano, under pressure, changed his testimony to say maybe he only withdrew 6-7 instead of 8mm to account for the missing blood. The defense said Furhman with his history likely took this missing blood and planted it on the gloves, car, and socks that OJ , (because he was prudent enough to wear gloves but leave it behind), left sloppily on the scene. Ron’s blood being found in the Bronco and anything else that was used as evidence was not enough to convict Oj beyond reasonable doubt because Fuhrman plead the fifth when asked if he tampered with the scene per his history . This is why the case tanked . There is no real proof we can be certain about because the detective who was a racist had carte Blanche to handle the crime scene and all its DNA evidence .

Here’s an article about Thano Peratis changing his testimony to account for the missing blood.

https://www.upi.com/amp/Archives/1996/12/10/OJ-nurse-changes-testimony/5632850194000/

Jesus Christ, the crime scene (where OJs blood was also found to the left of Bruno Magli footprints and what do you know a finger on OJs left hand was sliced open) was secured and processed before OJ returned from Chicago and started giving blood. OJs house (to include his Bronco) was also secured and searched before OJ returned home and started giving blood. The FBI also contradicted the defense hired gun expert regarding the EDTA issue.

Yep, he owned the exact rare shoe print found at the scene but the person you’re responding too, could see the murder herself and still find a way to defend it. She’s way down a rabbit hole

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would O.J. have cuts on his hand without cuts on the glove?

The glove looked pristine and brand new not like it went through double murder. The bloody leather glove was as shiny as a Michael Jackson’s and so obviously planted by Furhman. It was not in ruins consistent with the amount of blood found on it or OJ’s cuts or Ron’s defensive wounds.

Ego is a terrible thing. People don’t want to admit the prosecution’s evidence made no sense

It made perfect sense. The prosecution had a great case, but oj’s lawyers we’re better, the jury believed the case would be about helping out a black man that was charming, etc.
You really can’t be this delusional. It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact- Oj killed them. His own agent and Oj’s lawyers knew it too, but you can live in fantasy land if you want too

It’s not a fact OJ killed them. The smoking gun is the blood and OJ’s blood went missing from a lab . We aren’t sure that wasn’t planted because the lead detective has a history of planting evidence on black men .

Here’s a 1995 article about the missing blood. The prison nurse had to lie and say he only withdrew 6.7 mm of blood when he later said he was sure his initial testimony that it was 8 mm was correct because he withdrew that amount his entire career and it is an even number

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/06/us/witness-tries-to-explain-missing-simpson-blood.html

Have you researched any of this case at all. Oj was in Chicago so getting his blood to plant was an impossibility. They had no way of getting his blood because he wasn’t in town.
I loved the naked gun movies, too but he murdered two people. Go listen to the Oj interrogation, interviews he did(Chris Myers interview was riveting)

Jesus Christ, Chicago was in the immediate aftermath of the murders before a crime scene and investigation had been set up.

Once OJ was arrested for murders and in jail, he did get blood drawn stupidly to “clear his name” and get out of jail because the cops told him to do so help the investigation. Some of the 8mm blood in the vial collected by prison nurse Thano Peratis “went missing”. About 1-2 mm disappeared. Thano, under pressure, changed his testimony to say maybe he only withdrew 6-7 instead of 8mm to account for the missing blood. The defense said Furhman with his history likely took this missing blood and planted it on the gloves, car, and socks that OJ , (because he was prudent enough to wear gloves but leave it behind), left sloppily on the scene. Ron’s blood being found in the Bronco and anything else that was used as evidence was not enough to convict Oj beyond reasonable doubt because Fuhrman plead the fifth when asked if he tampered with the scene per his history . This is why the case tanked . There is no real proof we can be certain about because the detective who was a racist had carte Blanche to handle the crime scene and all its DNA evidence .

Here’s an article about Thano Peratis changing his testimony to account for the missing blood.

https://www.upi.com/amp/Archives/1996/12/10/OJ-nurse-changes-testimony/5632850194000/

Jesus Christ, the crime scene (where OJs blood was also found to the left of Bruno Magli footprints and what do you know a finger on OJs left hand was sliced open) was secured and processed before OJ returned from Chicago and started giving blood. OJs house (to include his Bronco) was also secured and searched before OJ returned home and started giving blood. The FBI also contradicted the defense hired gun expert regarding the EDTA issue.

Anonymous wrote:The Innocent Project is releasing plenty of men who weren’t as wealthy as OJ and didn’t have the means to hire attorneys that got framed and set up by police to take the fall just because police “think they did it”.

Police detectives are under extreme pressure to crack cold cases especially high profile ones and without any leads, they have to create ones so they use their own suspicions and biases to create a case. Detectives are in charge of evidence collecting and taping off crime scenes which creates a huge conflict of interest and possibility for corruption. I think OJ and Scott Peterson were victims of police misconduct

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would O.J. have cuts on his hand without cuts on the glove?

The glove looked pristine and brand new not like it went through double murder. The bloody leather glove was as shiny as a Michael Jackson’s and so obviously planted by Furhman. It was not in ruins consistent with the amount of blood found on it or OJ’s cuts or Ron’s defensive wounds.

Ego is a terrible thing. People don’t want to admit the prosecution’s evidence made no sense

It made perfect sense. The prosecution had a great case, but oj’s lawyers we’re better, the jury believed the case would be about helping out a black man that was charming, etc.
You really can’t be this delusional. It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact- Oj killed them. His own agent and Oj’s lawyers knew it too, but you can live in fantasy land if you want too

It’s not a fact OJ killed them. The smoking gun is the blood and OJ’s blood went missing from a lab . We aren’t sure that wasn’t planted because the lead detective has a history of planting evidence on black men .

Here’s a 1995 article about the missing blood. The prison nurse had to lie and say he only withdrew 6.7 mm of blood when he later said he was sure his initial testimony that it was 8 mm was correct because he withdrew that amount his entire career and it is an even number

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/06/us/witness-tries-to-explain-missing-simpson-blood.html

Have you researched any of this case at all. Oj was in Chicago so getting his blood to plant was an impossibility. They had no way of getting his blood because he wasn’t in town.
I loved the naked gun movies, too but he murdered two people. Go listen to the Oj interrogation, interviews he did(Chris Myers interview was riveting)

Jesus Christ, Chicago was in the immediate aftermath of the murders before a crime scene and investigation had been set up.

Once OJ was arrested for murders and in jail, he did get blood drawn stupidly to “clear his name” and get out of jail because the cops told him to do so help the investigation. Some of the 8mm blood in the vial collected by prison nurse Thano Peratis “went missing”. About 1-2 mm disappeared. Thano, under pressure, changed his testimony to say maybe he only withdrew 6-7 instead of 8mm to account for the missing blood. The defense said Furhman with his history likely took this missing blood and planted it on the gloves, car, and socks that OJ , (because he was prudent enough to wear gloves but leave it behind), left sloppily on the scene. Ron’s blood being found in the Bronco and anything else that was used as evidence was not enough to convict Oj beyond reasonable doubt because Fuhrman plead the fifth when asked if he tampered with the scene per his history . This is why the case tanked . There is no real proof we can be certain about because the detective who was a racist had carte Blanche to handle the crime scene and all its DNA evidence .

Here’s an article about Thano Peratis changing his testimony to account for the missing blood.

https://www.upi.com/amp/Archives/1996/12/10/OJ-nurse-changes-testimony/5632850194000/

Anonymous wrote:PP with the blood draw is nuts. Has s/he never had her blood drawn? I have, many times, and it is never ever the kind of precise process claimed.