Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:
This is primarily a story of government working against political enemies.
jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for this Jim Baker guy. How does one guy keep getting wrapped up in all these RW conspiracies?
Because it’s a lot easier to sell your followers on conspiracy theories when you have a consistent boogeyman. It’s like all of the ridiculous conspiracy theories about the Clintons. Most of them would get no traction if they were about anyone else, but the right has built the Clintons up into these mythic figures that RWNJs are eager to believe the worst about so it’s an easy sell. Now they’re doing the same thing with Jim Baker, but it doesn’t translate as well outside of true RWNJ circles because many Americans barely remember who Jim Baker is, if they ever knew of him in the first place.
LOL.
Nice try. The more you folks claim this is a "conspiracy theory," the more we know that the smoke is real.
And, Jim Baker deserves all the scrutiny he is getting.
DP. Speaking as a lawyer, I feel sorry for him. By doing his job, he's had his career spun sideways, again. Lawyers are conservative people by nature, not partisan or crackpots, want no part of any of this nonsense.
Signed
John Eastman
Sorry, not sure how you went from vetting internal company docs before release to advocating overturning an election. I'd ask you to elaborate but I can't imagine you would have anything sensible to say.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think this is a disputed:
https://www.westernjournal.com/fbi-confirms-hunter-bidens-laptop-says-story-not-russian-disinformation-report/
Everything the “Western Journal” publishes is disputed.
To be clear, Ratcliffe did say that the laptop was not Russian disinformation. However, Ratcliffe himself is not a credible source, despite the position he had.
Russia must’ve spent years faking all that info
Fake "all that" info? LMAO you're kidding, right?
That's not how it works. When you already have a bunch of info to start with, you only have to salt it with a small handful of "smoking gun" fakes. Russian FSB does this all the time.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:
It is pretty embarrassing how Taibbi is sockpuppeting for Musk.
jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:
Anonymous wrote:Elon may save america yet. God bless him!
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think this is a disputed:
https://www.westernjournal.com/fbi-confirms-hunter-bidens-laptop-says-story-not-russian-disinformation-report/
Everything the “Western Journal” publishes is disputed.
To be clear, Ratcliffe did say that the laptop was not Russian disinformation. However, Ratcliffe himself is not a credible source, despite the position he had.
Russia must’ve spent years faking all that info
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think this is a disputed:
https://www.westernjournal.com/fbi-confirms-hunter-bidens-laptop-says-story-not-russian-disinformation-report/
Everything the “Western Journal” publishes is disputed.
To be clear, Ratcliffe did say that the laptop was not Russian disinformation. However, Ratcliffe himself is not a credible source, despite the position he had.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for this Jim Baker guy. How does one guy keep getting wrapped up in all these RW conspiracies?
Because it’s a lot easier to sell your followers on conspiracy theories when you have a consistent boogeyman. It’s like all of the ridiculous conspiracy theories about the Clintons. Most of them would get no traction if they were about anyone else, but the right has built the Clintons up into these mythic figures that RWNJs are eager to believe the worst about so it’s an easy sell. Now they’re doing the same thing with Jim Baker, but it doesn’t translate as well outside of true RWNJ circles because many Americans barely remember who Jim Baker is, if they ever knew of him in the first place.
LOL.
Nice try. The more you folks claim this is a "conspiracy theory," the more we know that the smoke is real.
And, Jim Baker deserves all the scrutiny he is getting.
DP. Speaking as a lawyer, I feel sorry for him. By doing his job, he's had his career spun sideways, again. Lawyers are conservative people by nature, not partisan or crackpots, want no part of any of this nonsense.
Signed
John Eastman
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for this Jim Baker guy. How does one guy keep getting wrapped up in all these RW conspiracies?
Because it’s a lot easier to sell your followers on conspiracy theories when you have a consistent boogeyman. It’s like all of the ridiculous conspiracy theories about the Clintons. Most of them would get no traction if they were about anyone else, but the right has built the Clintons up into these mythic figures that RWNJs are eager to believe the worst about so it’s an easy sell. Now they’re doing the same thing with Jim Baker, but it doesn’t translate as well outside of true RWNJ circles because many Americans barely remember who Jim Baker is, if they ever knew of him in the first place.
LOL.
Nice try. The more you folks claim this is a "conspiracy theory," the more we know that the smoke is real.
And, Jim Baker deserves all the scrutiny he is getting.
DP. Speaking as a lawyer, I feel sorry for him. By doing his job, he's had his career spun sideways, again. Lawyers are conservative people by nature, not partisan or crackpots, want no part of any of this nonsense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for this Jim Baker guy. How does one guy keep getting wrapped up in all these RW conspiracies?
Because it’s a lot easier to sell your followers on conspiracy theories when you have a consistent boogeyman. It’s like all of the ridiculous conspiracy theories about the Clintons. Most of them would get no traction if they were about anyone else, but the right has built the Clintons up into these mythic figures that RWNJs are eager to believe the worst about so it’s an easy sell. Now they’re doing the same thing with Jim Baker, but it doesn’t translate as well outside of true RWNJ circles because many Americans barely remember who Jim Baker is, if they ever knew of him in the first place.
LOL.
Nice try. The more you folks claim this is a "conspiracy theory," the more we know that the smoke is real.
And, Jim Baker deserves all the scrutiny he is getting.
DP. Speaking as a lawyer, I feel sorry for him. By doing his job, he's had his career spun sideways, again. Lawyers are conservative people by nature, not partisan or crackpots, want no part of any of this nonsense.
Executives get fired all the time during corporate takeovers.
Anonymous wrote:Elon may save america yet. God bless him!