Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP. Every time any of this is mentioned, or any of the other “committee” parents are mentioned on the thread, the posts are reported, ridiculed etc and always in a very similar language. I don’t buy it.
To my casual observation of the reported facts, the Bisgaards never disassociated from Whittle. He was the founding HOS and they together knew a lot including what was happening and what was coming till the last minute. Perhaps just so their child can graduate but I think there could have been a lot more. She never left, and caused a controversy on the committee by being the employees’ representative against their will until it folded. Not only that, but the advisory board members like her get a stipend by Whittle’s own docs. So I don’t know, but it stinks
Just “screaming” at people and calling them trolls for pointing out the obvious open questions doesn’t make me see we’ll-intentioned people of sound judgment doing their best as these PPs would have one believe. It makes me think there’s plenty there for a nice expose. No I don’t think Bisgaard got the job at Maret to channel the students here, but I think a whole generation of parents got mislead by a small self-interested group of former admin and parents, and don’t think that the possible graft, rent-seeking behaviors, conflict of interest, insider dealing, favoritism (including the children of connected parents securing an otherwise impossible spot at Maret), if present, are unlikely to magically stop in a different setting.
If I were a journalist or a parent considering a lawsuit, I’d look closely into the parents on the committee and advisory board and other governance boards, who allegedly included Bisgaard, a “health” firm owner, a slumlord etc.
Plenty juicy stuff there and just calling intelligent people asking obvious questions trolls won’t make it go away.
She left before the school year was over. I don’t understand this bisgaard slander. The facts are Dennis left two years ago and she left before the year ended. Her role at whittle was good and I’m sure if you ask any whittle student she was one who brought a smilie on their faces after hearing related lies from VG and MR. I think it’s time we put a focus to the parents of the committee as well as heads of schools who were talking and had continues conversation with CW…. They had to know something and if they did it’s terrible they didn’t advise others before the trash letter.
Agreed. The school is over. One YEAR LONG experience shouldn’t taint someone’s career and portray how they would work at a new school. I agree with the new focus(one family in particular) worked very very closely with him and was active in regards to every deal and message however now they are no where to be found.
Know of at least 2 transfers personally from Whittle, probably many more to come. Is there some sort of directory that notifies parents of where these caravan s are coming from?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’d be different if they both left 2 years ago AND spoke out. Many chances to do that. They didn’t. Enough said.
You do realize the school has staff sign things were they couldn’t speak of many ongoing situations right? One staff broke this bug informing parents what was going on last year and the school threatened to sue him if he didn’t resign. So it’s time to hop off this “Bisgaard’s are terrible for not speaking out train.”
Anonymous wrote:It’d be different if they both left 2 years ago AND spoke out. Many chances to do that. They didn’t. Enough said.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP. Every time any of this is mentioned, or any of the other “committee” parents are mentioned on the thread, the posts are reported, ridiculed etc and always in a very similar language. I don’t buy it.
To my casual observation of the reported facts, the Bisgaards never disassociated from Whittle. He was the founding HOS and they together knew a lot including what was happening and what was coming till the last minute. Perhaps just so their child can graduate but I think there could have been a lot more. She never left, and caused a controversy on the committee by being the employees’ representative against their will until it folded. Not only that, but the advisory board members like her get a stipend by Whittle’s own docs. So I don’t know, but it stinks
Just “screaming” at people and calling them trolls for pointing out the obvious open questions doesn’t make me see we’ll-intentioned people of sound judgment doing their best as these PPs would have one believe. It makes me think there’s plenty there for a nice expose. No I don’t think Bisgaard got the job at Maret to channel the students here, but I think a whole generation of parents got mislead by a small self-interested group of former admin and parents, and don’t think that the possible graft, rent-seeking behaviors, conflict of interest, insider dealing, favoritism (including the children of connected parents securing an otherwise impossible spot at Maret), if present, are unlikely to magically stop in a different setting.
If I were a journalist or a parent considering a lawsuit, I’d look closely into the parents on the committee and advisory board and other governance boards, who allegedly included Bisgaard, a “health” firm owner, a slumlord etc.
Plenty juicy stuff there and just calling intelligent people asking obvious questions trolls won’t make it go away.
She left before the school year was over. I don’t understand this bisgaard slander. The facts are Dennis left two years ago and she left before the year ended. Her role at whittle was good and I’m sure if you ask any whittle student she was one who brought a smilie on their faces after hearing related lies from VG and MR. I think it’s time we put a focus to the parents of the committee as well as heads of schools who were talking and had continues conversation with CW…. They had to know something and if they did it’s terrible they didn’t advise others before the trash letter.
Anonymous wrote:DP. Every time any of this is mentioned, or any of the other “committee” parents are mentioned on the thread, the posts are reported, ridiculed etc and always in a very similar language. I don’t buy it.
To my casual observation of the reported facts, the Bisgaards never disassociated from Whittle. He was the founding HOS and they together knew a lot including what was happening and what was coming till the last minute. Perhaps just so their child can graduate but I think there could have been a lot more. She never left, and caused a controversy on the committee by being the employees’ representative against their will until it folded. Not only that, but the advisory board members like her get a stipend by Whittle’s own docs. So I don’t know, but it stinks
Just “screaming” at people and calling them trolls for pointing out the obvious open questions doesn’t make me see we’ll-intentioned people of sound judgment doing their best as these PPs would have one believe. It makes me think there’s plenty there for a nice expose. No I don’t think Bisgaard got the job at Maret to channel the students here, but I think a whole generation of parents got mislead by a small self-interested group of former admin and parents, and don’t think that the possible graft, rent-seeking behaviors, conflict of interest, insider dealing, favoritism (including the children of connected parents securing an otherwise impossible spot at Maret), if present, are unlikely to magically stop in a different setting.
If I were a journalist or a parent considering a lawsuit, I’d look closely into the parents on the committee and advisory board and other governance boards, who allegedly included Bisgaard, a “health” firm owner, a slumlord etc.
Plenty juicy stuff there and just calling intelligent people asking obvious questions trolls won’t make it go away.