Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You’re not going to find a single Republican who finds anything wrong with this whatsoever. But I agree with what I think you’re saying: that the Republican Party is slowly destroying America from within.
DP. Fwiw, I know plenty of Republicans who want nothing to do with abortion and want to leave it to doctors rather than the government and don't want it to be restricted or made illegal. Don't post absolutes if you don't want to be corrected.
The problem is that these constituents don't value the abortion issue enough and they vote in legislators who stick with the party line which is anti-abortion. This is why Republican party leaders try so hard to avoid betting abortion on election ballot initiatives. You saw what happened in Kansas. And I expect the same thing will happen in Ohio over the next few weeks. There are many people who are coming out of the woodwork to vote for the ballot initiative to protect abortion rights.
I think if you correct PPs to be "find a single elected Republican..." that PP would be much closer to the truth.
I won't disagree with that statement - but I will also say that abortion has not been on the ballot significantly since RvW was struck down, and each time it has pro-choice has won. So regular Republicans have not had much of a chance to vote on abortion at all recently. That's why these midterms are so important.
It's not like a discussion on DCUM is going to change anything one way or another - but the way some (many) posters talk about half the country is both incorrect and unhelpful. That was why I responded.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You’re not going to find a single Republican who finds anything wrong with this whatsoever. But I agree with what I think you’re saying: that the Republican Party is slowly destroying America from within.
DP. Fwiw, I know plenty of Republicans who want nothing to do with abortion and want to leave it to doctors rather than the government and don't want it to be restricted or made illegal. Don't post absolutes if you don't want to be corrected.
The problem is that these constituents don't value the abortion issue enough and they vote in legislators who stick with the party line which is anti-abortion. This is why Republican party leaders try so hard to avoid betting abortion on election ballot initiatives. You saw what happened in Kansas. And I expect the same thing will happen in Ohio over the next few weeks. There are many people who are coming out of the woodwork to vote for the ballot initiative to protect abortion rights.
I think if you correct PPs to be "find a single elected Republican..." that PP would be much closer to the truth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You’re not going to find a single Republican who finds anything wrong with this whatsoever. But I agree with what I think you’re saying: that the Republican Party is slowly destroying America from within.
DP. Fwiw, I know plenty of Republicans who want nothing to do with abortion and want to leave it to doctors rather than the government and don't want it to be restricted or made illegal. Don't post absolutes if you don't want to be corrected.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You’re not going to find a single Republican who finds anything wrong with this whatsoever. But I agree with what I think you’re saying: that the Republican Party is slowly destroying America from within.
DP. Fwiw, I know plenty of Republicans who want nothing to do with abortion and want to leave it to doctors rather than the government and don't want it to be restricted or made illegal. Don't post absolutes if you don't want to be corrected.
Anonymous wrote:
You’re not going to find a single Republican who finds anything wrong with this whatsoever. But I agree with what I think you’re saying: that the Republican Party is slowly destroying America from within.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LIVID here for anyone who has been here long enough to remember.
I'm a fed who had an anencephalic pregnancy that I terminated on the advice of my doctor. She performed the abortion at a local hospital and 6 weeks after the procedure I received notices that the procedure wasn't covered and that I owed 9000.
Perhaps you could ask the hospital for financial aid? I know someone who had a something similar but not pregnancy related and she got the bill forgiven
She should not have to do this, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LIVID here for anyone who has been here long enough to remember.
I'm a fed who had an anencephalic pregnancy that I terminated on the advice of my doctor. She performed the abortion at a local hospital and 6 weeks after the procedure I received notices that the procedure wasn't covered and that I owed 9000.
Perhaps you could ask the hospital for financial aid? I know someone who had a something similar but not pregnancy related and she got the bill forgiven
Anonymous wrote:LIVID here for anyone who has been here long enough to remember.
I'm a fed who had an anencephalic pregnancy that I terminated on the advice of my doctor. She performed the abortion at a local hospital and 6 weeks after the procedure I received notices that the procedure wasn't covered and that I owed 9000.
Anonymous wrote:LIVID here for anyone who has been here long enough to remember.
I'm a fed who had an anencephalic pregnancy that I terminated on the advice of my doctor. She performed the abortion at a local hospital and 6 weeks after the procedure I received notices that the procedure wasn't covered and that I owed 9000.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It would be nice, for once, if conservatives would use any of the compassion God gave them and to imagine themselves in other people’s shoes instead of having to experience personally the situations we pro choice people tried to warn them about.
Another bad and badly written law.
These people were rescued by the compassion of Planned Parenthood and their donors. And they are now single issue, pro choice voters. https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/08/health/ohio-abortion-long/index.html
Terrible story. Can we please all work hard and vote hard and donate hard to return the good people of this country to the sensible protections of Roe.
Except this didn’t have anything to do with the recent decision.
She was not prevented from getting an abortion.
She didn’t have insurance cover for the abortion due to a state law that dictates what health insurance coverage is available to state employees. A law that has existed for 25 years.
The law that prohibited state employees using their insurance to cover abortion except in narrowly defined cases was enacted in 1998.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It would be nice, for once, if conservatives would use any of the compassion God gave them and to imagine themselves in other people’s shoes instead of having to experience personally the situations we pro choice people tried to warn them about.
Another bad and badly written law.
These people were rescued by the compassion of Planned Parenthood and their donors. And they are now single issue, pro choice voters. https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/08/health/ohio-abortion-long/index.html
Terrible story. Can we please all work hard and vote hard and donate hard to return the good people of this country to the sensible protections of Roe.
Except this didn’t have anything to do with the recent decision.
She was not prevented from getting an abortion.
She didn’t have insurance cover for the abortion due to a state law that dictates what health insurance coverage is available to state employees. A law that has existed for 25 years.
The law that prohibited state employees using their insurance to cover abortion except in narrowly defined cases was enacted in 1998.