Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, VDA poster is getting pretty defensive … must have struck a cord of truth … 😃

No, I despise spinny nitwits who would never say anything you say on here to any of the VDA coach's face. You hide behind a display to call out people who can't defend themselves. I'm quite certain your DD is just as phony as you. Stop blaming VDA coaches for your feeble attempt to recapture your pathetic adolescence.

Ok, thanks VDA wonk. I would say it to his/her face by the way, and he/she can defend themself here on this forum.

Here’s the deal parents:
FCV and Union do nothing for their boys and their non-GA girls regarding “recruitment”. They do little to develop top players. However, they both have historically done a good job of recruiting top girls (already developed and good) to their GA/ECNL teams at older ages and having these girls who’d get recruited by college teams anyhow, get recruited under their banner. True. To compare Union and FCV, NM is a better coach than BP, but BP is a better marketer than NM. Take your pick. Both have placed several girls at G’town, VT and UVA, for example. Whether they get playing time once there or not is really up to the kid and their college coach at that point.

VDA has a few good girls teams at a few older age groups. Guess what? Those top girls also get recruited. Also their best coach (MW) came from BRYC, so again ‘recruiting’ (of a coach) not Development reigned here.

BRYC and Loudoun are simply struggling on the girls ECNL front. Mainly due to poor coaching and marketing at the older ages. For Loudoun this means that despite good younger teams, their top girl players get picked off by Union and FCV at the older ages due to NM’s superior coaching and connections and BP’s superior marketing (and CZ’s connections). Not sure what’s happening at BRYC (other than they lost coach MW) albeit for the teams I have watched they are decently coached, so best guess is that they are simply getting squeezed out in talent due to the glut of girls ECNL + FCV options in this area.

Arlington has always had more success and focus with boys than girls, and Bethesda’s best girls coach is a former Rush guy (i.e. they recruited the coach (KL) and his teams - so again the club development spin once again falls flat).

So again, no “club” is consistently outperforming anyone across all ages and genders. Coaches and kids outperform, not clubs. If your kid has a serious dedication and love for soccer and wants to play at the next level, have your kid find the best combo of coach/marketer (NM, BP, KL, or MW for example) and players for their age/gender and don’t believe the hype being slung at you on this forum regarding “clubs”. If you’re a parent you will not be offended at this advice. If you’re a club wonk, then you will.


Signed - the “no club is better than other clubs” Poster.

PS - please don’t reply acting like you’re me and confuse my point with yours. Thanks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was the last time a Loudoun ECNL team played up a year and won dominating?

Still waiting on the alleged excellence from Loudoun to shut the forum down. Guess I’ll die waiting.

When’s the last time you had a tea bag.

When Loudoun dominated a tournament playing up. Aka. Never. Suck it hard.

So funny how hard BP sweats Loudoun. He knows no matter how much success he has with FCV (and to have more success he has to bash Loudoun and VDA) he will never make as much as the Loudoun coaches and administers. So he sits in his shitty rambler in centreville wondering where it all went wrong for him. Why people don’t appreciate him more and fires up DCUM to blow off some steam. I personally now know his MO and find it hilarious. At the end of the day, you work for us. We pay your salary and in return you perform a service for us. you are like a teacher or housekeeper - we like you until we don’t and you will know when you dont

And you wonder why nobody likes LS?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was the last time a Loudoun ECNL team played up a year and won dominating?

Still waiting on the alleged excellence from Loudoun to shut the forum down. Guess I’ll die waiting.

When’s the last time you had a tea bag.

When Loudoun dominated a tournament playing up. Aka. Never. Suck it hard.

So funny how hard BP sweats Loudoun. He knows no matter how much success he has with FCV (and to have more success he has to bash Loudoun and VDA) he will never make as much as the Loudoun coaches and administers. So he sits in his shitty rambler in centreville wondering where it all went wrong for him. Why people don’t appreciate him more and fires up DCUM to blow off some steam. I personally now know his MO and find it hilarious. At the end of the day, you work for us. We pay your salary and in return you perform a service for us. you are like a teacher or housekeeper - we like you until we don’t and you will know when you dont

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was the last time a Loudoun ECNL team played up a year and won dominating?

Still waiting on the alleged excellence from Loudoun to shut the forum down. Guess I’ll die waiting.

When’s the last time you had a tea bag.

When Loudoun dominated a tournament playing up. Aka. Never. Suck it hard.

Anonymous wrote:When was the last time a Loudoun ECNL team played up a year and won dominating?

Still waiting on the alleged excellence from Loudoun to shut the forum down. Guess I’ll die waiting.

When’s the last time you had a tea bag.

When was the last time a Loudoun ECNL team played up a year and won dominating?

Still waiting on the alleged excellence from Loudoun to shut the forum down. Guess I’ll die waiting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, VDA poster is getting pretty defensive … must have struck a cord of truth … 😃

Your insufferable. You don’t even make sense.

Yes, yes I do make sense. I am only insufferable to the VDA poster and his minions. BTW, I don’t believe that the VDA poster started this thread, the FCV (possibly BP) guy did. But, the VDA poster quickly jumped on the “bash FCV” bandwagon (which is typically ok as the FCV guy is pretty insufferable himself). Anyhow, I am the “the club doesn’t make a difference” poster. Be it Union, BRYC, FCV, Loudoun, VDA, Arlington, Bethesda, etc. across genders and age groups and leagues there is little proven dominance by one club or the other. The sheer size of these clubs and their presence in the girl’s GA or ECNL leagues make them the focal point of many of these threads. These clubs’ ability to coach well or to run a club well in a persistent and consistent manner across all ages and genders is simply a fallacy that some of their supporters like to over-hype on this forum, often by bashing the competition or touting one particular gender’s success in college recruitment for that genders one top team. It is a tired and simplistic argument.

I agree with all of that. However, you’re on a FCV thread bashing VDA which means you’re not as neutral as you claim. And I’m still trying to figure out what a VDA supporter said in this thread that has you all worked up. I read back several pages and see nothing

Because I (B) it out for you on page 22, clearly, you can't read or see.

“Because most of the post are coming from VDA coaches. One of your coaches literally had a conversation with his players about going on here. Take a wild guess who.”

This? This is your issue?

You're a frequent poster on this board. Constantly putting people and clubs down in order to stir the pot while secretly blaming others in order to avoid being exposed as shady as hell. Don't be shocked and surprised because VDA coaches will not tolerate your toxic behavior. Let’s be clear, No coach told your child that any coach goes on DCU. Quick question, If you don’t live and breathe DCU, Why would you discuss DCU with your DD about that if this previously wasn’t a topic in your family? Or, as I previously stated, simply making stuff up to ensure that no one suspects you. Extremely mature 🙄

Anonymous wrote:Wow, VDA poster is getting pretty defensive … must have struck a cord of truth … 😃

No, I despise spinny nitwits who would never say anything you say on here to any of the VDA coach's face. You hide behind a display to call out people who can't defend themselves. I'm quite certain your DD is just as phony as you. Stop blaming VDA coaches for your feeble attempt to recapture your pathetic adolescence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, VDA poster is getting pretty defensive … must have struck a cord of truth … 😃

Your insufferable. You don’t even make sense.

Yes, yes I do make sense. I am only insufferable to the VDA poster and his minions. BTW, I don’t believe that the VDA poster started this thread, the FCV (possibly BP) guy did. But, the VDA poster quickly jumped on the “bash FCV” bandwagon (which is typically ok as the FCV guy is pretty insufferable himself). Anyhow, I am the “the club doesn’t make a difference” poster. Be it Union, BRYC, FCV, Loudoun, VDA, Arlington, Bethesda, etc. across genders and age groups and leagues there is little proven dominance by one club or the other. The sheer size of these clubs and their presence in the girl’s GA or ECNL leagues make them the focal point of many of these threads. These clubs’ ability to coach well or to run a club well in a persistent and consistent manner across all ages and genders is simply a fallacy that some of their supporters like to over-hype on this forum, often by bashing the competition or touting one particular gender’s success in college recruitment for that genders one top team. It is a tired and simplistic argument.

I agree with all of that. However, you’re on a FCV thread bashing VDA which means you’re not as neutral as you claim. And I’m still trying to figure out what a VDA supporter said in this thread that has you all worked up. I read back several pages and see nothing

Because I (B) it out for you on page 22, clearly, you can't read or see.

“Because most of the post are coming from VDA coaches. One of your coaches literally had a conversation with his players about going on here. Take a wild guess who.”

This? This is your issue?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, VDA poster is getting pretty defensive … must have struck a cord of truth … 😃

Your insufferable. You don’t even make sense.

Yes, yes I do make sense. I am only insufferable to the VDA poster and his minions. BTW, I don’t believe that the VDA poster started this thread, the FCV (possibly BP) guy did. But, the VDA poster quickly jumped on the “bash FCV” bandwagon (which is typically ok as the FCV guy is pretty insufferable himself). Anyhow, I am the “the club doesn’t make a difference” poster. Be it Union, BRYC, FCV, Loudoun, VDA, Arlington, Bethesda, etc. across genders and age groups and leagues there is little proven dominance by one club or the other. The sheer size of these clubs and their presence in the girl’s GA or ECNL leagues make them the focal point of many of these threads. These clubs’ ability to coach well or to run a club well in a persistent and consistent manner across all ages and genders is simply a fallacy that some of their supporters like to over-hype on this forum, often by bashing the competition or touting one particular gender’s success in college recruitment for that genders one top team. It is a tired and simplistic argument.

I agree with all of that. However, you’re on a FCV thread bashing VDA which means you’re not as neutral as you claim. And I’m still trying to figure out what a VDA supporter said in this thread that has you all worked up. I read back several pages and see nothing

Because I (B) it out for you on page 22, clearly, you can't read or see.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, VDA poster is getting pretty defensive … must have struck a cord of truth … 😃

Your insufferable. You don’t even make sense.

Yes, yes I do make sense. I am only insufferable to the VDA poster and his minions. BTW, I don’t believe that the VDA poster started this thread, the FCV (possibly BP) guy did. But, the VDA poster quickly jumped on the “bash FCV” bandwagon (which is typically ok as the FCV guy is pretty insufferable himself). Anyhow, I am the “the club doesn’t make a difference” poster. Be it Union, BRYC, FCV, Loudoun, VDA, Arlington, Bethesda, etc. across genders and age groups and leagues there is little proven dominance by one club or the other. The sheer size of these clubs and their presence in the girl’s GA or ECNL leagues make them the focal point of many of these threads. These clubs’ ability to coach well or to run a club well in a persistent and consistent manner across all ages and genders is simply a fallacy that some of their supporters like to over-hype on this forum, often by bashing the competition or touting one particular gender’s success in college recruitment for that genders one top team. It is a tired and simplistic argument.

I agree with all of that. However, you’re on a FCV thread bashing VDA which means you’re not as neutral as you claim. And I’m still trying to figure out what a VDA supporter said in this thread that has you all worked up. I read back several pages and see nothing

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, VDA poster is getting pretty defensive … must have struck a cord of truth … 😃

Your insufferable. You don’t even make sense.

Yes, yes I do make sense. I am only insufferable to the VDA poster and his minions. BTW, I don’t believe that the VDA poster started this thread, the FCV (possibly BP) guy did. But, the VDA poster quickly jumped on the “bash FCV” bandwagon (which is typically ok as the FCV guy is pretty insufferable himself). Anyhow, I am the “the club doesn’t make a difference” poster. Be it Union, BRYC, FCV, Loudoun, VDA, Arlington, Bethesda, etc. across genders and age groups and leagues there is little proven dominance by one club or the other. The sheer size of these clubs and their presence in the girl’s GA or ECNL leagues make them the focal point of many of these threads. These clubs’ ability to coach well or to run a club well in a persistent and consistent manner across all ages and genders is simply a fallacy that some of their supporters like to over-hype on this forum, often by bashing the competition or touting one particular gender’s success in college recruitment for that genders one top team. It is a tired and simplistic argument.

Anonymous wrote:Wow, VDA poster is getting pretty defensive … must have struck a cord of truth … 😃

Your insufferable. You don’t even make sense.