Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A fascinating list of... mostly nobodies.![]()
By all means feel free to state your identity and list your personal accomplishments.
What are the relevant accomplishments of "Angus Worthing" or "Brett Young"? Their names are listed here as though someone should care.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A fascinating list of... mostly nobodies.![]()
By all means feel free to state your identity and list your personal accomplishments.
What are the relevant accomplishments of "Angus Worthing" or "Brett Young"? Their names are listed here as though someone should care.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A fascinating list of... mostly nobodies.![]()
By all means feel free to state your identity and list your personal accomplishments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are these people. The posts are annonomous. The guy who keeps accusing the neighborhood of being racist including in the listening session link in Tammy's post lives on Foxhall near the park. He is well known and was seen defacing the save hardy park signs. The police said it is better to not confront him.
Two questions:
1. What did this "defacing" consist of? The signs were up for 4 months and, despite passing them regularly, I at least didn't see any of this "defacing".
2. Why did it seem like a good idea to call the police on someone "defacing" signs that were themselves (illegally) defacing public property? I don't know many taggers, but doubt it's common practice among them to call the police on taggers who tag over other people's tags.
Signs have also been taken out of peopls yards
A neighbor covered up the defacing with paint etc
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are these people. The posts are annonomous. The guy who keeps accusing the neighborhood of being racist including in the listening session link in Tammy's post lives on Foxhall near the park. He is well known and was seen defacing the save hardy park signs. The police said it is better to not confront him.
Two questions:
1. What did this "defacing" consist of? The signs were up for 4 months and, despite passing them regularly, I at least didn't see any of this "defacing".
2. Why did it seem like a good idea to call the police on someone "defacing" signs that were themselves (illegally) defacing public property? I don't know many taggers, but doubt it's common practice among them to call the police on taggers who tag over other people's tags.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are these people. The posts are annonomous. The guy who keeps accusing the neighborhood of being racist including in the listening session link in Tammy's post lives on Foxhall near the park. He is well known and was seen defacing the save hardy park signs. The police said it is better to not confront him.
Two questions:
1. What did this "defacing" consist of? The signs were up for 4 months and, despite passing them regularly, I at least didn't see any of this "defacing".
2. Why did it seem like a good idea to call the police on someone "defacing" signs that were themselves (illegally) defacing public property? I don't know many taggers, but doubt it's common practice among them to call the police on taggers who tag over other people's tags.
Anonymous wrote:Who are these people. The posts are annonomous. The guy who keeps accusing the neighborhood of being racist including in the listening session link in Tammy's post lives on Foxhall near the park. He is well known and was seen defacing the save hardy park signs. The police said it is better to not confront him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Um...isn't this moot at this point the lab got the lease so the whole old Hardy ship has sailed. The only thing worth discussing at this point is whether 5% of the park (which by the way they spent a bunch improving) could be SHARED with an elementary school which would likely maintain the park and folks could use the grounds of the elementary school so like nothing lost unless you are against public school kids and the real motives are classics, racism and entitlement by a selfish closed in close minded group of neighbors.
"classics, racism, and entitlement....."
whoooa--who is this person who feels "entitled" to make these judgements of some "group of neighbors" who in all likelihood he has not even intereacted with
People who live in the Foxhall Village Historic District are actually on record about their experiences with racism in the neighborhood. The sexism is viewable to everyone with a Washington Post subscription and the classism is readily apparent to anyone with a brain.
Anonymous wrote:A fascinating list of... mostly nobodies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Um...isn't this moot at this point the lab got the lease so the whole old Hardy ship has sailed. The only thing worth discussing at this point is whether 5% of the park (which by the way they spent a bunch improving) could be SHARED with an elementary school which would likely maintain the park and folks could use the grounds of the elementary school so like nothing lost unless you are against public school kids and the real motives are classics, racism and entitlement by a selfish closed in close minded group of neighbors.
"classics, racism, and entitlement....."
whoooa--who is this person who feels "entitled" to make these judgements of some "group of neighbors" who in all likelihood he has not even intereacted with
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Um...isn't this moot at this point the lab got the lease so the whole old Hardy ship has sailed. The only thing worth discussing at this point is whether 5% of the park (which by the way they spent a bunch improving) could be SHARED with an elementary school which would likely maintain the park and folks could use the grounds of the elementary school so like nothing lost unless you are against public school kids and the real motives are classics, racism and entitlement by a selfish closed in close minded group of neighbors.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
My kids go to a private school AND I pay DC taxes that support public schools. Does this make me anti-public school?
Anonymous wrote:Old Hardy advocates - please do yourselves a favor and not have your arguments led by parents who’ve sent their kids to privates after elementary school.
Anonymous wrote:
You talk about your bucolic parks and traffic issues - and you expect sympathy from the rest of the city?
Not sure who you're talking about here either.Anonymous wrote:
You all just seem like entitled privilege poster people.
Anonymous wrote:
As a third gen DCer - kids from these neighborhoods were barely in DCPS even in 1996….
This sentence doesn't parseAnonymous wrote:
And thinking about positioning the only school that serves the needs of many special needs in the area is a political winner?
Anonymous wrote:
No they aren’t educating lots of DC kids for free or lower cost - but that’s also from DCPS contesting and denying sending kids who need the types of special Ed that Lab can provide unless you spend tons of time and money suing the city.
Anonymous wrote:They used to have more DCPS kids until the policy change to uniform deny placement about 10 years ago.
Anonymous wrote:I have kids in both Lab (it’s the ONLY school closer than Baltimore that can provide the services my kid needs) and Wilson.