Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WaterGaetz

Nope, give the man his due.

Alternatively Sex-Gaet (yes, spelled that way)

Let’s call it what it is. He trafficked underage girls. He raped underaged girls (minors cannot consent to sex with someone that old). He paid them for this. This isn’t “sex gaet.”

Anonymous wrote:Seems like there are possibly campaign finance implications. Like how he paid these women.

That seems like it would rise to the level of federal charges - using campaign money to pay off a 17 year old for sex

I have a feeling that it's going to turn out he was selling her to other people, too.

Seems like there are possibly campaign finance implications. Like how he paid these women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Can we make predictions what he's actually going to be indicted for?

I just do not believe that the feds would prosecute him over having sex - even paying for sex - with someone who is 17. It HAS to be more than that, right?

Was he acting as a pimp, do you think? Think it's going to be a campaign finance thing - he used campaign funds to pay for sex with a 17 year old?

What?? I could see that he might get away with just sleeping with a 17-year old, esp. if there was no employee/subordinate issue. But paying for a trafficked teenager? (--> because that's what she is!) I don't think that's what normal people think is a "petty" issue.

It doesn't matter how petty it is.

Illegal is illegal. Al Capone went to prison for tax evasion, not murdering hundreds of folks.

So are you guys saying you think that's all he's going to be indicted for? I am the PP and I'm not saying it's not gross or illegal, but that I would be surprised if that is ALL he goes down for - if he is actually going down. I think there has to be more.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WaterGaetz

Nope, give the man his due.

Alternatively Sex-Gaet (yes, spelled that way)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Can we make predictions what he's actually going to be indicted for?

I just do not believe that the feds would prosecute him over having sex - even paying for sex - with someone who is 17. It HAS to be more than that, right?

Was he acting as a pimp, do you think? Think it's going to be a campaign finance thing - he used campaign funds to pay for sex with a 17 year old?

What?? I could see that he might get away with just sleeping with a 17-year old, esp. if there was no employee/subordinate issue. But paying for a trafficked teenager? (--> because that's what she is!) I don't think that's what normal people think is a "petty" issue.

It doesn't matter how petty it is.

Illegal is illegal. Al Capone went to prison for tax evasion, not murdering hundreds of folks.

DP.

Yes, gaetz has probably been up to much worse than we will ever know. He will sing to lighten his sentence.

Anonymous wrote:

Can we make predictions what he's actually going to be indicted for?

I just do not believe that the feds would prosecute him over having sex - even paying for sex - with someone who is 17. It HAS to be more than that, right?

Was he acting as a pimp, do you think? Think it's going to be a campaign finance thing - he used campaign funds to pay for sex with a 17 year old?

What?? I could see that he might get away with just sleeping with a 17-year old, esp. if there was no employee/subordinate issue. But paying for a trafficked teenager? (--> because that's what she is!) I don't think that's what normal people think is a "petty" issue.

It doesn't matter how petty it is.

Illegal is illegal. Al Capone went to prison for tax evasion, not murdering hundreds of folks.

When do the handcuffs come out?

Can we make predictions what he's actually going to be indicted for?

I just do not believe that the feds would prosecute him over having sex - even paying for sex - with someone who is 17. It HAS to be more than that, right?

Was he acting as a pimp, do you think? Think it's going to be a campaign finance thing - he used campaign funds to pay for sex with a 17 year old?

What?? I could see that he might get away with just sleeping with a 17-year old, esp. if there was no employee/subordinate issue. But paying for a trafficked teenager? (--> because that's what she is!) I don't think that's what normal people think is a "petty" issue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Should be retitled Matt Gaetz leaving Congress to be the face of SuperMax

He can see Cheyenne from his prison window!

🎵 When the walls come tumblin' down
When the walls come crumblin' crumblin'
When the walls come tumblin' tumblin' down 🎵

Can we make predictions what he's actually going to be indicted for?

I just do not believe that the feds would prosecute him over having sex - even paying for sex - with someone who is 17. It HAS to be more than that, right?

Was he acting as a pimp, do you think? Think it's going to be a campaign finance thing - he used campaign funds to pay for sex with a 17 year old?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I see he got the special revlon hair dryer.

I know that rapists don’t have “a look,” but Gaetz looks like a rapist.

Anonymous wrote:WaterGaetz

Nope, give the man his due.

WaterGaetz