Anonymous wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/texas...eeze/ar-BB1dOkgd?ocid=msedgntp One lady now faces a 6k power bill, and the disaster isn't over yet
Isn't this price-gouging?
I don't understand this. Aren't utility rates regulated? How does this work in Texas?
Anonymous wrote:
is it cheaper to prepare for disaster or weather the storm?
First, think of the wasted productivity with millions offline and focused on survival.
Then, think of all of the damage to the infrastructure
Then, think of the damage to private property
Then, think of all the overtime for first responders and DPW types
This is billions of dolllars.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:is it cheaper to prepare for disaster or weather the storm?
For the power generators it is cheaper to deal with the blackouts. For everyone else it is cheaper to prepare. All those frozen pipes and water/sewer system damage is going to be very expensive to clean up and repair.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/texas...eeze/ar-BB1dOkgd?ocid=msedgntp One lady now faces a 6k power bill, and the disaster isn't over yet
Isn't this price-gouging?
Anonymous wrote:is it cheaper to prepare for disaster or weather the storm?
Anonymous wrote:is it cheaper to prepare for disaster or weather the storm?
Anonymous wrote:is it cheaper to prepare for disaster or weather the storm?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
That’s the point! Nobody has a system with 100% backup. What you have is reserve margin which acts as what you’re calling backup. The storm knocked out the reserve margin. There isn’t a system in the US is built to withstand a 4 standard deviation event. Everybody wants to act like you can just plan to this event, but it doesn’t work that way anywhere in the country.
No. What people are saying is that if the generators, in areas like Dallas, had undertaken standard winterization measures and Texas paid for emergency capacity, like the rest of us do, then they would not have been minutes away from a total grid collapse on Sunday.
What this shows is the inherent problems and limitations of an energy only market. That energy only market is the cause of the problem. It does not handle emeegency situations very well.
+1
There were several states facing the exact same temperatures, and they all fared better. So no matter how many standard deviations the pp wants to imply,it's factually wrong to say that nobody else was prepared. I mean, Louisiana did better. Let that sink in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
That’s the point! Nobody has a system with 100% backup. What you have is reserve margin which acts as what you’re calling backup. The storm knocked out the reserve margin. There isn’t a system in the US is built to withstand a 4 standard deviation event. Everybody wants to act like you can just plan to this event, but it doesn’t work that way anywhere in the country.
No. What people are saying is that if the generators, in areas like Dallas, had undertaken standard winterization measures and Texas paid for emergency capacity, like the rest of us do, then they would not have been minutes away from a total grid collapse on Sunday.
What this shows is the inherent problems and limitations of an energy only market. That energy only market is the cause of the problem. It does not handle emeegency situations very well.
it's factually wrong to say that nobody else was prepared. I mean, Louisiana did better. Let that sink in.
You know this is rare but not out of the norm for Texas in terms of temperatures. There was a similar event in 2011. The feds and state of Texas did an after action review. There were recommendations made to avoid this. So yes if fact you can plan for something like this.