Anonymous wrote:I often wonder if any of the people that say “flipping burgers” is easy work, have every worked any kind of food service or retail. It’s horrible thankless work. Count yourself lucky that you acquired the skills to move on or avoid it. Some people don’t, and that’s not their fault. They deserve to live off their work too, if they’re working full time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Incentivizes under the table payments, and illegal immigration.
Deincentivizes skilled trades, an apprentice electrician shouldn't be paid the same as a fast food worker.
Why not? Both are unskilled labor.
+1
One could argue that since the apprentice requires direct supervision, they should be paid less. Other professions don’t pay their interns at all.
Shows you know nothing about the trades. An apprentice is not an intern.
Also maybe it’s not so cool that some interns are paid nothing, because the system favors only relatively well-off young people being able to do internships.
I never could have afforded to work for free. Unpaid interns are getting subsidized by their parents.
So to get back to your original point...why shouldn't an apprentice electrician be paid the same as a fast food worker?
Np here. You have no idea what the apprentice label means in the trades. Do a couple hours of research and stop embarrassing yourself.
Actually I do know a little about it. My dad is an electrician. He was not an apprentice and has never had an apprentice but has talked about apprenticeships to me several times since I was a kid.
Now that I've proven my blue collar bona fides, can you explain why fast food workers shouldn't make the same thing as an apprentice electrician?
Then surely your father knows the requirements to become a journeyman?
DP. The rest of us had to take out loans that we are still paying off to become professionals so maybe pipe down. A 15 dollar an hour summer job would have helped me out a ton while I was working for free. Ridiculous to begrudge people a living wage because of some misguided fear that they are a threat to you or your profession.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP. The rest of us had to take out loans that we are still paying off to become professionals so maybe pipe down. A 15 dollar an hour summer job would have helped me out a ton while I was working for free. Ridiculous to begrudge people a living wage because of some misguided fear that they are a threat to you or your profession.
DP. "Working for Free" does not automatically turn into "working for $15 per hour." You do not have to work for free. But, raising minimum wage just means that there will be fewer opportunities to get jobs that allow you to save for college. And, if "free interns" get paid, there will certainly be fewer opportunities to get internships.
There are other options. Go to community college first two years; work weekends and summers; skip Spring break trips; eat ramen; ROTC scholarship; etc.
Pay off your loans before you take that trip to Europe or purchase an expensive car. Read menus from right to left. Etc.
An apprentice is getting paid to get their education -‘d I don’t begrudge them that because the profession needs people more than mine does—it’s hard work. But it’s essentially paid graduate school. So that’s why it’s a minimum wage job. Like other graduate “students” the pay sucks but you finish up as a pro and it’s worth it. Someone workig 40 hours a week deserves the same pay, regardless of their trajectory..
Anonymous wrote:DP. The rest of us had to take out loans that we are still paying off to become professionals so maybe pipe down. A 15 dollar an hour summer job would have helped me out a ton while I was working for free. Ridiculous to begrudge people a living wage because of some misguided fear that they are a threat to you or your profession.
DP. "Working for Free" does not automatically turn into "working for $15 per hour." You do not have to work for free. But, raising minimum wage just means that there will be fewer opportunities to get jobs that allow you to save for college. And, if "free interns" get paid, there will certainly be fewer opportunities to get internships.
There are other options. Go to community college first two years; work weekends and summers; skip Spring break trips; eat ramen; ROTC scholarship; etc.
Pay off your loans before you take that trip to Europe or purchase an expensive car. Read menus from right to left. Etc.
DP. The rest of us had to take out loans that we are still paying off to become professionals so maybe pipe down. A 15 dollar an hour summer job would have helped me out a ton while I was working for free. Ridiculous to begrudge people a living wage because of some misguided fear that they are a threat to you or your profession.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Incentivizes under the table payments, and illegal immigration.
Deincentivizes skilled trades, an apprentice electrician shouldn't be paid the same as a fast food worker.
Why not? Both are unskilled labor.
+1
One could argue that since the apprentice requires direct supervision, they should be paid less. Other professions don’t pay their interns at all.
Shows you know nothing about the trades. An apprentice is not an intern.
Also maybe it’s not so cool that some interns are paid nothing, because the system favors only relatively well-off young people being able to do internships.
I never could have afforded to work for free. Unpaid interns are getting subsidized by their parents.
So to get back to your original point...why shouldn't an apprentice electrician be paid the same as a fast food worker?
Np here. You have no idea what the apprentice label means in the trades. Do a couple hours of research and stop embarrassing yourself.
Actually I do know a little about it. My dad is an electrician. He was not an apprentice and has never had an apprentice but has talked about apprenticeships to me several times since I was a kid.
Now that I've proven my blue collar bona fides, can you explain why fast food workers shouldn't make the same thing as an apprentice electrician?
Then surely your father knows the requirements to become a journeyman?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Incentivizes under the table payments, and illegal immigration.
Deincentivizes skilled trades, an apprentice electrician shouldn't be paid the same as a fast food worker.
Why not? Both are unskilled labor.
+1
One could argue that since the apprentice requires direct supervision, they should be paid less. Other professions don’t pay their interns at all.
Shows you know nothing about the trades. An apprentice is not an intern.
Also maybe it’s not so cool that some interns are paid nothing, because the system favors only relatively well-off young people being able to do internships.
I never could have afforded to work for free. Unpaid interns are getting subsidized by their parents.
So to get back to your original point...why shouldn't an apprentice electrician be paid the same as a fast food worker?
Np here. You have no idea what the apprentice label means in the trades. Do a couple hours of research and stop embarrassing yourself.
Actually I do know a little about it. My dad is an electrician. He was not an apprentice and has never had an apprentice but has talked about apprenticeships to me several times since I was a kid.
Now that I've proven my blue collar bona fides, can you explain why fast food workers shouldn't make the same thing as an apprentice electrician?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Incentivizes under the table payments, and illegal immigration.
Deincentivizes skilled trades, an apprentice electrician shouldn't be paid the same as a fast food worker.
Why not? Both are unskilled labor.
+1
One could argue that since the apprentice requires direct supervision, they should be paid less. Other professions don’t pay their interns at all.
Shows you know nothing about the trades. An apprentice is not an intern.
Also maybe it’s not so cool that some interns are paid nothing, because the system favors only relatively well-off young people being able to do internships.
I never could have afforded to work for free. Unpaid interns are getting subsidized by their parents.
So to get back to your original point...why shouldn't an apprentice electrician be paid the same as a fast food worker?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Incentivizes under the table payments, and illegal immigration.
Deincentivizes skilled trades, an apprentice electrician shouldn't be paid the same as a fast food worker.
Why not? Both are unskilled labor.
+1
One could argue that since the apprentice requires direct supervision, they should be paid less. Other professions don’t pay their interns at all.
Shows you know nothing about the trades. An apprentice is not an intern.
Also maybe it’s not so cool that some interns are paid nothing, because the system favors only relatively well-off young people being able to do internships.
I never could have afforded to work for free. Unpaid interns are getting subsidized by their parents.
So to get back to your original point...why shouldn't an apprentice electrician be paid the same as a fast food worker?
Np here. You have no idea what the apprentice label means in the trades. Do a couple hours of research and stop embarrassing yourself.
Anonymous wrote:
You do realize at the moment an employer can not ask about immigration status right?
That’s the issue, everyone blames the employer for hiring them, when it’s illegal for us to even ask if they are here legally. You can’t have it both ways. You can’t not allow us to ask, then blame us when we don’t know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Incentivizes under the table payments, and illegal immigration.
Deincentivizes skilled trades, an apprentice electrician shouldn't be paid the same as a fast food worker.
Why not? Both are unskilled labor.
+1
One could argue that since the apprentice requires direct supervision, they should be paid less. Other professions don’t pay their interns at all.
Shows you know nothing about the trades. An apprentice is not an intern.
Also maybe it’s not so cool that some interns are paid nothing, because the system favors only relatively well-off young people being able to do internships.
I never could have afforded to work for free. Unpaid interns are getting subsidized by their parents.
So to get back to your original point...why shouldn't an apprentice electrician be paid the same as a fast food worker?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Incentivizes under the table payments, and illegal immigration.
Deincentivizes skilled trades, an apprentice electrician shouldn't be paid the same as a fast food worker.
Why not? Both are unskilled labor.
+1
One could argue that since the apprentice requires direct supervision, they should be paid less. Other professions don’t pay their interns at all.
Shows you know nothing about the trades. An apprentice is not an intern.
Also maybe it’s not so cool that some interns are paid nothing, because the system favors only relatively well-off young people being able to do internships.
I never could have afforded to work for free. Unpaid interns are getting subsidized by their parents.