Anonymous wrote:They had some high school players coaching younger teams last summer. Was this coach a high school aged person with maybe less self-control or a grown woman?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was it the YJMA 26 team?
It was a 27 team with a couple of 2026 girls playing down…
To be clear YJMA 26s has 5 27 players on it. All the kids were played down were age eligible.
Anonymous wrote:So, just to clarify things: there was only one YJMA team entered in the entire StJames Winter 8 tournament. They were in the Blizzard division with a mix of ‘26, ‘27 and ‘28 grad year teams. The other division, Snowflake, had grad year ‘25 teams with one ‘26 team (Stars LB ‘26) and was won by a “super team” called Storm that is mostly Capital ‘25 blue players. They beat the Stars ‘26 team in the finals.
The YJMA team does not have a grad year listed. It was playing though, to be clear, in a division that had a mix of grad year teams. It was this YJ coach who publicly accused the refs of being “paid $100 per yellow card” against them while playing the Stars ‘28 team in the championship round. This YJMA coach is the one who pulled her team in anger in the middle of the game. That team was playing in an extremely aggressive manner outside the norms of the sport. This was not about checking. This was about swinging sticks at opponents heads and shoving opposing players to the ground, neither of which are allowed even at the college level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was it the YJMA 26 team?
It was a 27 team with a couple of 2026 girls playing down…
Not the first time of a "parent" accusing girls of playing down, but were ignorant of the facts. Just because a player is in a 26 game and then also in a 27 game the same day doesn't mean she was playing down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was it the YJMA 26 team?
It was a 27 team with a couple of 2026 girls playing down…
To be clear YJMA 26s has 5 27 players on it. All the kids were played down were age eligible.
Nice try! Rules are clear it is based on Graduation Year not birthday! If it was a U14 or U15 then yes. But this was clearly a Graduate year based tournament.
You are still confused. If a 2027 is talented, athletic, big or aggressive and can benefit playing up in the youth levels then he/she could play on a 2026 team. RULES DO ALLOW IT. If he/she normally plays on a 2026 team, when they decide to help a 2027 team (that's their grad year) it's not playing down. That player is now playing in their grad class instead of playing up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was it the YJMA 26 team?
It was a 27 team with a couple of 2026 girls playing down…
To be clear YJMA 26s has 5 27 players on it. All the kids were played down were age eligible.
Nice try! Rules are clear it is based on Graduation Year not birthday! If it was a U14 or U15 then yes. But this was clearly a Graduate year based tournament.
You are still confused. If a 2027 is talented, athletic, big or aggressive and can benefit playing up in the youth levels then he/she could play on a 2026 team. RULES DO ALLOW IT. If he/she normally plays on a 2026 team, when they decide to help a 2027 team (that's their grad year) it's not playing down. That player is now playing in their grad class instead of playing up.
Anonymous wrote:Who is this coach? She/he sounds awful!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was it the YJMA 26 team?
It was a 27 team with a couple of 2026 girls playing down…
To be clear YJMA 26s has 5 27 players on it. All the kids were played down were age eligible.
Nice try! Rules are clear it is based on Graduation Year not birthday! If it was a U14 or U15 then yes. But this was clearly a Graduate year based tournament.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was it the YJMA 26 team?
It was a 27 team with a couple of 2026 girls playing down…
To be clear YJMA 26s has 5 27 players on it. All the kids were played down were age eligible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was it the YJMA 26 team?
It was a 27 team with a couple of 2026 girls playing down…