Anonymous wrote:Here's my take on SYC as a parent. We've been with SYC for 2 years and am leaving this season. Over 30% of my son's team members will also be leaving. Lack of player development, coaching and leadership. Do your homework and not be fooled by expansion, expansion and marketing. There is a lack of ethics in looking to stack the W column while adversely affecting the playing time of the team members. Maybe within the regs but not in the spirit of fairness. Not what you want your son/daughter to learn.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do appreciate that SYC keeps fees relatively low for little kids. I thought it was going to be $2500 just to start out.
I wouldn't say low. isnt it about the norm for travel soccer at that age.
Anonymous wrote:I do appreciate that SYC keeps fees relatively low for little kids. I thought it was going to be $2500 just to start out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do any of the SYC families feel that it is too big? Were considering for DS but seems like he'd be a drop in the pond.
They’ve grown fast, I’m not sure they know how to be big yet (I.e. not letting your ds feel like that)
Anonymous wrote:Do any of the SYC families feel that it is too big? Were considering for DS but seems like he'd be a drop in the pond.
Anonymous wrote:Do any of the SYC families feel that it is too big? Were considering for DS but seems like he'd be a drop in the pond.
Anonymous wrote:Which club in the area would you pick for more of a focus on girls? Looking at the early ages. Attended tryouts for U9s. So many kids!
Anonymous wrote:My input on SYC:
1.) When travel program received new goals, the club put them at Loisdale where only boys trained
2.) When travel program received more new goals, the club put them at Hayfield where again, the overwhelming majority of use was for boys training
3.) From what I hear, there were no interviews done to replace SS and KM for their teams (U17 and U16 girls)
When the new staff came in we were a little apprehensive, but then very happy because DD loved the coach. But with the coaching changes, it's easy to look back and see we're in a changing club. I'm not sure what the direction is, aside from growing growing growing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My input on SYC:
1.) When travel program received new goals, the club put them at Loisdale where only boys trained
2.) When travel program received more new goals, the club put them at Hayfield where again, the overwhelming majority of use was for boys training
3.) From what I hear, there were no interviews done to replace SS and KM for their teams (U17 and U16 girls)
When the new staff came in we were a little apprehensive, but then very happy because DD loved the coach. But with the coaching changes, it's easy to look back and see we're in a changing club. I'm not sure what the direction is, aside from growing growing growing.
sounds like the party is over
Anonymous wrote:My input on SYC:
1.) When travel program received new goals, the club put them at Loisdale where only boys trained
2.) When travel program received more new goals, the club put them at Hayfield where again, the overwhelming majority of use was for boys training
3.) From what I hear, there were no interviews done to replace SS and KM for their teams (U17 and U16 girls)
When the new staff came in we were a little apprehensive, but then very happy because DD loved the coach. But with the coaching changes, it's easy to look back and see we're in a changing club. I'm not sure what the direction is, aside from growing growing growing.