Anonymous wrote:Just keeping posting in this thread. Then the money will magically appear back in your account. That’s the strategy $160 loser is following.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people here trying to defend this clearly poor behavior on the part of LS? Keeping at least some dues for the travel portion of the program, where they actually provided a service with zoom meetings and home training is at least something tangible in terms of service.

The Rec kids got zippy from the Spring program. Nothing. That money should be refunded completely and the sentiment here should be unanimous on that, unless you are a travel or ECNL parent concerned that the refund of that money would cause the club to go under, which it shouldn’t since the club was also eligible for and took up some of the government’s low interest financing.

Because it’s $82? And the vitriolic posts seem completely incongruous with what is at stake?

It’s $160 and it’s robbery. Sorry LS homer. We don’t exist to subsidize your club.

If its "your" club, how were you affected and subsidizing? Very telling, FCV guy.

NP. I agree. Nobody cries this much or this long over $160. It’s that FCV troll that always has to get the last post. Wait for it...

Imagine being on the sideline with these Loudoun parents. What douches.

How so?

I’m the PP who was referred to above as an LS homer (whatever that is). I live in MD and my kids don’t even play soccer. The level of rage on this thread is totally unhealthy in relation to what is at stake. I’m sorry for your loss but I think for your own health you may need to move on. I am sincerely worried about your blood pressure.

Imagine following a thread about soccer, not living in the community, not related to a soccer club in any way, not even having a kid who plays soccer posting in a thread about soccer and telling the stakeholders that they are somehow crazy for wanting a refund.

What kind of a loser even posts in a thread that is if zero relevance to them?

+100

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LS parents are STILL defending this? Why can’t you folks just admit the issue and lobby the management to do the right thing. I mean, you are staying and paying your dues. Why hold these peoples money hostage?

“These” people that don’t have a kid that plays for LS? The ones from MD talking about “your” club? Yeah, ok.

For the 100th time, LS should have given money back, but they didn’t. So if you were actually affected, then disput CC charge, file a claim, file a lawsuit, otherwise mind your own business. It’s kinda like a white male joing BLM. It just ain’t your bag baby (say that in an Austin Powers voice please).

Anonymous wrote:Any one of you who thinks LS is going to do anything about it at this point is seriously fooling yourselves. A couple of anonymous people bitching on a forum and a few tweets/facebook posts isn't going to change anything. They are not going to "make it right". LS is laughing at you all while reading over that sexy bank statement they got over all of this, and now it's back to business as usual for them as they've opened registration for all the next seasons.

Submit those chargebacks already. If you're on here bitching but haven't submitted a chargeback, than you obviously don't really care that much about the money and just want to argue online.

Anonymous wrote:LS parents are STILL defending this? Why can’t you folks just admit the issue and lobby the management to do the right thing. I mean, you are staying and paying your dues. Why hold these peoples money hostage?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people here trying to defend this clearly poor behavior on the part of LS? Keeping at least some dues for the travel portion of the program, where they actually provided a service with zoom meetings and home training is at least something tangible in terms of service.

The Rec kids got zippy from the Spring program. Nothing. That money should be refunded completely and the sentiment here should be unanimous on that, unless you are a travel or ECNL parent concerned that the refund of that money would cause the club to go under, which it shouldn’t since the club was also eligible for and took up some of the government’s low interest financing.

Because it’s $82? And the vitriolic posts seem completely incongruous with what is at stake?

It’s $160 and it’s robbery. Sorry LS homer. We don’t exist to subsidize your club.

If its "your" club, how were you affected and subsidizing? Very telling, FCV guy.

NP. I agree. Nobody cries this much or this long over $160. It’s that FCV troll that always has to get the last post. Wait for it...

Imagine being on the sideline with these Loudoun parents. What douches.

How so?

I’m the PP who was referred to above as an LS homer (whatever that is). I live in MD and my kids don’t even play soccer. The level of rage on this thread is totally unhealthy in relation to what is at stake. I’m sorry for your loss but I think for your own health you may need to move on. I am sincerely worried about your blood pressure.

Imagine following a thread about soccer, not living in the community, not related to a soccer club in any way, not even having a kid who plays soccer posting in a thread about soccer and telling the stakeholders that they are somehow crazy for wanting a refund.

What kind of a loser even posts in a thread that is if zero relevance to them?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people here trying to defend this clearly poor behavior on the part of LS? Keeping at least some dues for the travel portion of the program, where they actually provided a service with zoom meetings and home training is at least something tangible in terms of service.

The Rec kids got zippy from the Spring program. Nothing. That money should be refunded completely and the sentiment here should be unanimous on that, unless you are a travel or ECNL parent concerned that the refund of that money would cause the club to go under, which it shouldn’t since the club was also eligible for and took up some of the government’s low interest financing.

Because it’s $82? And the vitriolic posts seem completely incongruous with what is at stake?

It’s $160 and it’s robbery. Sorry LS homer. We don’t exist to subsidize your club.

If its "your" club, how were you affected and subsidizing? Very telling, FCV guy.

NP. I agree. Nobody cries this much or this long over $160. It’s that FCV troll that always has to get the last post. Wait for it...

Imagine being on the sideline with these Loudoun parents. What douches.

How so?

I’m the PP who was referred to above as an LS homer (whatever that is). I live in MD and my kids don’t even play soccer. The level of rage on this thread is totally unhealthy in relation to what is at stake. I’m sorry for your loss but I think for your own health you may need to move on. I am sincerely worried about your blood pressure.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people here trying to defend this clearly poor behavior on the part of LS? Keeping at least some dues for the travel portion of the program, where they actually provided a service with zoom meetings and home training is at least something tangible in terms of service.

The Rec kids got zippy from the Spring program. Nothing. That money should be refunded completely and the sentiment here should be unanimous on that, unless you are a travel or ECNL parent concerned that the refund of that money would cause the club to go under, which it shouldn’t since the club was also eligible for and took up some of the government’s low interest financing.

Because it’s $82? And the vitriolic posts seem completely incongruous with what is at stake?

It’s $160 and it’s robbery. Sorry LS homer. We don’t exist to subsidize your club.

If its "your" club, how were you affected and subsidizing? Very telling, FCV guy.

NP. I agree. Nobody cries this much or this long over $160. It’s that FCV troll that always has to get the last post. Wait for it...

Imagine being on the sideline with these Loudoun parents. What douches.

How so?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people here trying to defend this clearly poor behavior on the part of LS? Keeping at least some dues for the travel portion of the program, where they actually provided a service with zoom meetings and home training is at least something tangible in terms of service.

The Rec kids got zippy from the Spring program. Nothing. That money should be refunded completely and the sentiment here should be unanimous on that, unless you are a travel or ECNL parent concerned that the refund of that money would cause the club to go under, which it shouldn’t since the club was also eligible for and took up some of the government’s low interest financing.

Because it’s $82? And the vitriolic posts seem completely incongruous with what is at stake?

It’s $160 and it’s robbery. Sorry LS homer. We don’t exist to subsidize your club.

If its "your" club, how were you affected and subsidizing? Very telling, FCV guy.

NP. I agree. Nobody cries this much or this long over $160. It’s that FCV troll that always has to get the last post. Wait for it...

Imagine being on the sideline with these Loudoun parents. What douches.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people here trying to defend this clearly poor behavior on the part of LS? Keeping at least some dues for the travel portion of the program, where they actually provided a service with zoom meetings and home training is at least something tangible in terms of service.

The Rec kids got zippy from the Spring program. Nothing. That money should be refunded completely and the sentiment here should be unanimous on that, unless you are a travel or ECNL parent concerned that the refund of that money would cause the club to go under, which it shouldn’t since the club was also eligible for and took up some of the government’s low interest financing.

Because it’s $82? And the vitriolic posts seem completely incongruous with what is at stake?

It’s $160 and it’s robbery. Sorry LS homer. We don’t exist to subsidize your club.

If its "your" club, how were you affected and subsidizing? Very telling, FCV guy.

NP. I agree. Nobody cries this much or this long over $160. It’s that FCV troll that always has to get the last post. Wait for it...