Anonymous wrote:Judge rules Trump can’t postpone E. Jean Carroll’s defamation case
https://nypost.com/2020/08/06/judge-says-trump-cant-postpone-e-jean-carrolls-defamation-case/amp/?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_medium=SocialFlow&utm_source=NYPTwitter&__twitter_impression=true

Given that all he does is tweet, watch TV, play golf (on our dime) and commit various crimes, of course he needs to answer for this.

Judge rules Trump can’t postpone E. Jean Carroll’s defamation case
https://nypost.com/2020/08/06/judge-says-trump-cant-postpone-e-jean-carrolls-defamation-case/amp/?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_medium=SocialFlow&utm_source=NYPTwitter&__twitter_impression=true

Lawsuits
(1) Ivana Trump
(2) Summer Zervos
(3) Alva Johnson
(4) Jean Carroll
(5) Jane Doe/Katie Johnson

Rape
(1) Ivana Trump
(2) Jean Carroll
(3) Jane Doe/Katie Johnson

Crotch groping
(1) Jessica Leeds
(2) Kristin Anderson
(3) Jill Harth

Butt and breast groping
(1) Karena Virginia
(2) Melinda McGillivray
(3) Ninni Laaksonen
(4) Summer Zervos
(5) Cassandra Searles

Unwanted kissing
(1) Temple Taggart
(2) Cathy Heller
(3) Natasha Stoynoff (with tongue)
(4) Juliet Huddy
(5) Jennifer Murphy
(6) Rachel Crooks
(7) Jessica Drake
(8) Alva Johnson

Lewd ogling
(1) Lisa Boyne
(2) Mariah Billado
(3) Victoria Hughes
(4) Tasha Dixon
(5) Bridget Sullivan
(6) Samantha Holvey

I've left out the persistent phone calls and offers of money (e g., Jessica Drake, Cassandra Searles and more).

Interview with Howard Stern: https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/blogs/bal...stage-when-beauty-queens%3famp

https://web.archive.org/web/20161012211150/http://...he-owned-miss-universe-w444634

Access Hollywood: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-reco...6-bf8a-3d26847eeed4_story.html

“And when you’re a star, they let you do it,” Trump says. “You can do anything.”

“Whatever you want,” says another voice, apparently Bush’s.

“Grab them by the p---y,” Trump says. “You can do anything.””

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Mail, that British right-wing rag? You're going to have to do better than this. How come no US papers, not even the Post or the Enquirer, picked this up?

Not even Fox picked up this supposed debunking reported in the Daily Mail. A search of Fox.com doesn't show either the allegation or the supposed debunking of the allegation.

No wonder Fox viewers are so ignorant about their sexual predator president.

The Twitterverse is full of accusations against Trump for sexually abusing minors. One guy posted a list, which he claimed a connected Republican gave him, of underage girls and boys who Trump paid off. I'm not going to post it here, because who knows.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile, Reps are playing their usual "look over there" diversion game, accusing Clinton of hanging around Epstein (read: Clinton took a few rides on Epstein's airplane).

There is actually evidence that Clinton accompanied Epstein on the plane Flight logs.
Sorry if that is just too inconvenient for you.

Jane Doe has two witnesses, who filed affidavits, for her claim that Trump raped her when she was 13. Sorry if that is inconvenient for you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jane Doe/Katie Johnson had (at least) two witnesses.

The move to bring on Mason comes just weeks after the plaintiff filed an amended complaint that included a new witness in the case identified as “Joan Doe,” who says that the plaintiff told her about the alleged sexual contact with Trump and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein in 1994–95.

On Friday, a 2005 hot mic conversation was released of Trump implying he sexually assaults women by grabbing them by the "pussy" and kissing them without their consent. The recording caused upheaval in the Republican Party, but Trump at Monday's debate said he's never sexually assaulted a woman.

Another witness, “Tiffany Doe,” submitted an affidavit in the case claiming that she allegedly witnessed Trump and Epstein rape the plaintiff multiple times. In her affidavit, she admits to acting as a “recruiter” hired by Epstein to attract young women to parties at his New York City apartment.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/mikehayes/this-high-profile-defense-attorney-is-now-representing-a-wom

And yet, NONE of them have any proof. No photographs, no evidence at all.
Convenient that another "witness" appear when her lawsuit gets tossed.
It's not believable.

They both swore affidavits. Witness testimony is "proof."

Demanding rape victims produce "photographs" taken during the rape is disgusting.

Jane Doe says that Trump threatened her with disappearance if she talked, and Trump mentioned a 12-year-old named Maria.

Para 23, page 7, https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3130729-DOE-V-TRUMP.html

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile, Reps are playing their usual "look over there" diversion game, accusing Clinton of hanging around Epstein (read: Clinton took a few rides on Epstein's airplane).

There is actually evidence that Clinton accompanied Epstein on the plane Flight logs.
Sorry if that is just too inconvenient for you.

Anonymous wrote:Jane Doe/Katie Johnson had (at least) two witnesses.

The move to bring on Mason comes just weeks after the plaintiff filed an amended complaint that included a new witness in the case identified as “Joan Doe,” who says that the plaintiff told her about the alleged sexual contact with Trump and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein in 1994–95.

On Friday, a 2005 hot mic conversation was released of Trump implying he sexually assaults women by grabbing them by the "pussy" and kissing them without their consent. The recording caused upheaval in the Republican Party, but Trump at Monday's debate said he's never sexually assaulted a woman.

Another witness, “Tiffany Doe,” submitted an affidavit in the case claiming that she allegedly witnessed Trump and Epstein rape the plaintiff multiple times. In her affidavit, she admits to acting as a “recruiter” hired by Epstein to attract young women to parties at his New York City apartment.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/mikehayes/this-high-profile-defense-attorney-is-now-representing-a-wom

And yet, NONE of them have any proof. No photographs, no evidence at all.
Convenient that another "witness" appear when her lawsuit gets tossed.
It's not believable.

Meanwhile, Reps are playing their usual "look over there" diversion game, accusing Clinton of hanging around Epstein (read: Clinton took a few rides on Epstein's airplane).

Here is Jane Doe/Katie Johnson's third and final lawsuit.


You can read the statements from her two corroborators, "Joan Doe" and "Tiffany Doe" are at the end.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3130729-DOE-V-TRUMP.html

The same filing quotes Trump's response, which I forgot to add. Trump provided a statement to AMI media (see post above about his relationship with them). Here it is.

The allegations are not only categorically false, but disgusting at the highest level and clearly framed to elicit media attention or, perhaps, are simply politically motivated. There is absolutely no merit to these allegations. Period.

Jane Doe/Katie Johnson had (at least) two witnesses.

The move to bring on Mason comes just weeks after the plaintiff filed an amended complaint that included a new witness in the case identified as “Joan Doe,” who says that the plaintiff told her about the alleged sexual contact with Trump and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein in 1994–95.

On Friday, a 2005 hot mic conversation was released of Trump implying he sexually assaults women by grabbing them by the "pussy" and kissing them without their consent. The recording caused upheaval in the Republican Party, but Trump at Monday's debate said he's never sexually assaulted a woman.

Another witness, “Tiffany Doe,” submitted an affidavit in the case claiming that she allegedly witnessed Trump and Epstein rape the plaintiff multiple times. In her affidavit, she admits to acting as a “recruiter” hired by Epstein to attract young women to parties at his New York City apartment.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/mikehayes/this-high-profile-defense-attorney-is-now-representing-a-wom

The Daily Mail is wrong in several places.

Jane Doe/Johnson did have a witness who is cited in her lawsuit, see the post at 9:38, contrary to the Daily Mail's claim.

Jane Doe/Johnson's lawyers said she dropped her suit because she had been threatened and was scared. There's almost no rumors about her being paid off, contrary to the Daily Mail's claim. In fact, see the post above at 9:34: Ronan Farrow says it was too late to pay her off because she had already filed her first suit, in California.