Anonymous wrote:Post email or it didn’t happen. If boys are in ECNL then
girls will follow and if not this year then next. No way boys in ECNL just for the heck of it.
Anonymous wrote:Post email or it didn’t happen. If boys are in ECNL then
girls will follow and if not this year then next. No way boys in ECNL just for the heck of it.
Anonymous wrote:Post email or it didn’t happen. If boys are in ECNL then
girls will follow and if not this year then next. No way boys in ECNL just for the heck of it.
Anonymous wrote:Post email or it didn’t happen. If boys are in ECNL then
girls will follow and if not this year then next. No way boys in ECNL just for the heck of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If this is true and not sure it is then it would be with the promise that the girls get in next year. They would not put the boys in without some kind of agreement for the girls. It would make zero sense otherwise.
Move to GA is real for girls. If you are a current DA parent at ASA you would have got an email at 5PM from German. If you did not, and you are speculating on this board of its authenticity then let me confirm. It’s real.
Anonymous wrote:If this is true and not sure it is then it would be with the promise that the girls get in next year. They would not put the boys in without some kind of agreement for the girls. It would make zero sense otherwise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Like I predicted Girls doing GAL, boys doing ECNL
If Arlington picked ECNL for boys and GAL for girls, that says something. By all accounts, an all in ECNL decision would have been welcomed in Richmond.
Yeah, no.
No e-mail on the boys side yet. Did the e-mail to the girls' parents definitely define the decision on the boys side too? Seems odd to me that they would join ECNL on the boys side without the girls - when nobody on the boys side (coaches, players, nor parents) wanted to do that. Presumably there was some problem with working out the MLS league in that case...?
It did not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Like I predicted Girls doing GAL, boys doing ECNL
If Arlington picked ECNL for boys and GAL for girls, that says something. By all accounts, an all in ECNL decision would have been welcomed in Richmond.
Yeah, no.
No e-mail on the boys side yet. Did the e-mail to the girls' parents definitely define the decision on the boys side too? Seems odd to me that they would join ECNL on the boys side without the girls - when nobody on the boys side (coaches, players, nor parents) wanted to do that. Presumably there was some problem with working out the MLS league in that case...?