Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Face it, republicans, this is not a winning issue for you.
+1. From a political standpoint, I am not sure how this is a 'winning" issue. Over 65% of American favor the pro-choice side and even if you are pro-life, there is almost unanimity aroun rape and incest. Even folks who might be on the fence can see what kind of power grab this is from the right. Add to it the tariffs and foreign policy fiascos and it just become untenable to see how Trump can win/keep the Senate without Russian intervention.
I suppose that is what they are counting on, which is why we need to get away from electronic voting immediately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^Disagreeing with you is ignorant and not allowed? Are you the internet police? No one ever told you that you can get pregnant every single time you have sex and yeah a partner can leave/hit you/whatever? That never occurred to you? And if your state had banned abortion, you really couldn’t have come up with $50 to get to another state? Maybe you shouldn’t have been doing it then.
Discussing abortion in a political forum without knowing what Guttmacher is is ignorant. You do know what ignorant means, right?
I think having sex when you can’t 100% take responsibility for a baby on your own is irresponsible. You know what irresponsible means, right? And then justifying getting rid of said baby because it was an inconvenience, well — we know what kind of person you are.
Anonymous wrote:^Disagreeing with you is ignorant and not allowed? Are you the internet police? No one ever told you that you can get pregnant every single time you have sex and yeah a partner can leave/hit you/whatever? That never occurred to you? And if your state had banned abortion, you really couldn’t have come up with $50 to get to another state? Maybe you shouldn’t have been doing it then.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don’t support the ban, but reading #youknowme —maybe people ought to consider having less sex with strangers? For every one person on there saying it was rape or a fetus with medical issues, there’s 50 saying — well I barely knew the guy . . . Uh maybe then he keeps it in his pants and you keep your underwear on?!
What makes you think abortions are the product of sex with strangers? 45% of the women having abortions are married or living with a partner.
https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-states
They’re fine marrying him or living with him and sleeping with him until there’s a baby and then it’s — oh I don’t want a kid with him. Read the hashtag — it really isn’t about medical problems or rape for the majority talking about it. Is it no longer taught that you can pregnant EVERY time you have sex no matter how many BC methods you’re using, so if you don’t want a baby or child support, don’t do it?!
I’m sorry, are you trying to imply that the HASHTAG YOU’RE READING has better information about who the women are who get abortions and why they get them than The Guttmacher Institute?
Don’t know who Guttmacher is but it’s in line with what I’m reading. Sex is all well and good until it’s — ew I don’t want a baby with HIM?!
Anonymous wrote:Face it, republicans, this is not a winning issue for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^Disagreeing with you is ignorant and not allowed? Are you the internet police? No one ever told you that you can get pregnant every single time you have sex and yeah a partner can leave/hit you/whatever? That never occurred to you? And if your state had banned abortion, you really couldn’t have come up with $50 to get to another state? Maybe you shouldn’t have been doing it then.
Discussing abortion in a political forum without knowing what Guttmacher is is ignorant. You do know what ignorant means, right?
I think having sex when you can’t 100% take responsibility for a baby on your own is irresponsible. You know what irresponsible means, right? And then justifying getting rid of said baby because it was an inconvenience, well — we know what kind of person you are.
We know what kind of person you are, too.
I’m not the one who got rid of a baby.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don’t support the ban, but reading #youknowme —maybe people ought to consider having less sex with strangers? For every one person on there saying it was rape or a fetus with medical issues, there’s 50 saying — well I barely knew the guy . . . Uh maybe then he keeps it in his pants and you keep your underwear on?!
What makes you think abortions are the product of sex with strangers? 45% of the women having abortions are married or living with a partner.
https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-states
They’re fine marrying him or living with him and sleeping with him until there’s a baby and then it’s — oh I don’t want a kid with him. Read the hashtag — it really isn’t about medical problems or rape for the majority talking about it. Is it no longer taught that you can pregnant EVERY time you have sex no matter how many BC methods you’re using, so if you don’t want a baby or child support, don’t do it?!
I’m sorry, are you trying to imply that the HASHTAG YOU’RE READING has better information about who the women are who get abortions and why they get them than The Guttmacher Institute?
Don’t know who Guttmacher is but it’s in line with what I’m reading. Sex is all well and good until it’s — ew I don’t want a baby with HIM?!
Shut your ignorant mouth.
The Guttmacher Institute is the foremost authority on research into the topics of women’s health and reproductive rights.
https://www.guttmacher.org
25 years ago I had an accidental pregnancy, while on the pill, with someone I had been dating for more than a year. When I told him I was pregnant was the first time he punched me in the face - because I was ruining his future.
So no, I didn’t want to have a baby with him.
Anonymous wrote:Men who create unwanted pregnancies need to be jailed so they can't do it again.
Anonymous wrote:LOL at the PP saying that “people” shouldn’t be having sex if they aren’t 100% ready to have a child.
Come on, now. We all know you are referring to women. You think that WOMEN shouldn’t be having sex unless they are 100% ready to have a child. Because this reasoning will never deter men from having sex. Ever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^Disagreeing with you is ignorant and not allowed? Are you the internet police? No one ever told you that you can get pregnant every single time you have sex and yeah a partner can leave/hit you/whatever? That never occurred to you? And if your state had banned abortion, you really couldn’t have come up with $50 to get to another state? Maybe you shouldn’t have been doing it then.
Discussing abortion in a political forum without knowing what Guttmacher is is ignorant. You do know what ignorant means, right?
I think having sex when you can’t 100% take responsibility for a baby on your own is irresponsible. You know what irresponsible means, right? And then justifying getting rid of said baby because it was an inconvenience, well — we know what kind of person you are.
We know what kind of person you are, too.
I’m not the one who got rid of a baby.