Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any brave Big 3 parent to share this year's matriculation list of schools?
It's not about being "brave." These schools don't release yearly matriculation lists so there's nothing to share.
GDS is pretty transparent about this information.
+1000
The information for GDS per year matriculation comes out in their fall magazine. STA's is grouped for 4 to 5 years and one can only infer averages from the web site.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any brave Big 3 parent to share this year's matriculation list of schools?
It's not about being "brave." These schools don't release yearly matriculation lists so there's nothing to share.
GDS is pretty transparent about this information.
+1000
The information for GDS per year matriculation comes out in their fall magazine. STA's is grouped for 4 to 5 years and one can only infer averages from the web site.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any brave Big 3 parent to share this year's matriculation list of schools?
It's not about being "brave." These schools don't release yearly matriculation lists so there's nothing to share.
GDS is pretty transparent about this information.
If you call the below information transparent, the word certainly has a new meaning! Nobody can dispute that.
https://www.gds.org/academics/college-counseling/matriculation-map
GDS College Matriculation, 2015–2018
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any brave Big 3 parent to share this year's matriculation list of schools?
It's not about being "brave." These schools don't release yearly matriculation lists so there's nothing to share.
GDS is pretty transparent about this information.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any brave Big 3 parent to share this year's matriculation list of schools?
It's not about being "brave." These schools don't release yearly matriculation lists so there's nothing to share.
GDS is pretty transparent about this information.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any brave Big 3 parent to share this year's matriculation list of schools?
It's not about being "brave." These schools don't release yearly matriculation lists so there's nothing to share.
GDS is pretty transparent about this information.
Anonymous wrote:However, there are many paths to happiness and most of them don’t involve the Ivy League.
Anonymous wrote:Your kids will get in to the schools they're qualified for and want to apply to. Reading through this thread has been an absolute nightmare and I feel awful for the school employees and honestly for your kids too. The tighter you grip, the more they'll shoot through the gaps in your fingers when they taste that first bit of freedom at school. The craziest parents' kids tend to be the first ones flaming out. Be kind and positive and helpful and let them guide their own process helped by the competent professionals who do this as a career. Jesus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any brave Big 3 parent to share this year's matriculation list of schools?
It's not about being "brave." These schools don't release yearly matriculation lists so there's nothing to share.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I always saw the top cohort referenced as HYPSM (Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, MIT)
+1. Since when were Stanford and MIT considered as less prestigious? Never.
Since the rise of tech I actually think Harvard, MIT and Stanford have become the top 3 for the most ambitious kids. Harvard was fortunate because Zuckerberg started Facebook and pulled a lot of Harvard alums in with him. Yale may be the shakiest because they have the weakest CS/tech but they have recently poured resources in to fix it and of course they have such a dominant law school. Princeton mysteriously seems to maintain its status no matter how the winds blow so kudos to them for that.
The "HYPSM" jargon is almost completely attributable to the crazed college admissions industries in Asia (East and South) and the recent immigrants and their children who rely on that industry to inform their understanding of American colleges. And since they come from developing countries, they think computer science and engineering are the only avenues of higher learning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I always saw the top cohort referenced as HYPSM (Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, MIT)
+1. Since when were Stanford and MIT considered as less prestigious? Never.
Since the rise of tech I actually think Harvard, MIT and Stanford have become the top 3 for the most ambitious kids. Harvard was fortunate because Zuckerberg started Facebook and pulled a lot of Harvard alums in with him. Yale may be the shakiest because they have the weakest CS/tech but they have recently poured resources in to fix it and of course they have such a dominant law school. Princeton mysteriously seems to maintain its status no matter how the winds blow so kudos to them for that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I always saw the top cohort referenced as HYPSM (Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, MIT)
+1. Since when were Stanford and MIT considered as less prestigious? Never.