Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did not read through all of the previous posts, so I apologize in advance if I'm missing something, but for those who state that diversity is their main goal - do you think that bussing kids from one end of the county to the other, the result being only a slight change in diversity is more important than having kids bussed out of their neighborhoods and schools that they can walk to? It's fine if that is the thought, I'm just wondering if it is.
Over a third of kids are bussed already due to choice schools, including lots of kids who presumably could be walking to neighborhood schools. Arlingtonians are fine with bussing kids all over the county.
Really? Greater than 33% of APS students go to a choice school???
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:South Arlington parent here with a kid who is zoned for Kenmore in the next couple years. If APS will allow it, I will happily take my kid to any school but Kenmore. I don't need a bus. APS just doesn't allow it.
Why? If you are using GS scores or other people's stories, that's silly. If you have a prior experience with the school, that would be different. PP who sends her child to Kenmore instead of Williamsburg here. Kenmore teachers have been supremely responsive, DD seems to be happy and has made some new friends, and she's enjoying her small classes. So far, admittedly only a month in, I've been very impressed
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did not read through all of the previous posts, so I apologize in advance if I'm missing something, but for those who state that diversity is their main goal - do you think that bussing kids from one end of the county to the other, the result being only a slight change in diversity is more important than having kids bussed out of their neighborhoods and schools that they can walk to? It's fine if that is the thought, I'm just wondering if it is.
Over a third of kids are bussed already due to choice schools, including lots of kids who presumably could be walking to neighborhood schools. Arlingtonians are fine with bussing kids all over the county.
Anonymous wrote:South Arlington parent here with a kid who is zoned for Kenmore in the next couple years. If APS will allow it, I will happily take my kid to any school but Kenmore. I don't need a bus. APS just doesn't allow it.
Anonymous wrote:I did not read through all of the previous posts, so I apologize in advance if I'm missing something, but for those who state that diversity is their main goal - do you think that bussing kids from one end of the county to the other, the result being only a slight change in diversity is more important than having kids bussed out of their neighborhoods and schools that they can walk to? It's fine if that is the thought, I'm just wondering if it is.
Anonymous wrote:I did not read through all of the previous posts, so I apologize in advance if I'm missing something, but for those who state that diversity is their main goal - do you think that bussing kids from one end of the county to the other, the result being only a slight change in diversity is more important than having kids bussed out of their neighborhoods and schools that they can walk to? It's fine if that is the thought, I'm just wondering if it is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For other readers that prioritize demographics (better distribution of FARM students), what do you think about 1F vs 1H?
H decreases Kenmore to 45%, but leaves Williamsburg with only 4%, while F increases Kenmore to 53%, but keeps Williamsburg and the new school at over 10%. Is it more important to keep all schools below 50%, or is it better to make sure there is at least a small percentage at each school? I'm drawn to 1H, but worry that Williamsburg will become disconnected from the rest of the country by having such a minuscule percentage. Which of these is a better first step? Does anyone see ways to improve 1F to get Kenmore below 50? (without just shifting to Jefferson)
Not looking for a pound of flesh.
As a south Arlington parent I would love to see the diversity map that sliced vertically but I’m not naive.
Schools at 50% are unacceptable.
I really don’t want to hear people whining about their walk zones.
Schools at 50% poverty are unacceptable.
Who are you to decide that 50% poverty schools are unacceptable? Poverty is concentrated in undesirable areas with lower rents -- a problem that Arlington itself created. Too bad, so sad. It's like saying kids in NW DC should be bused to SE public schools to balance things out.
I hope you get hit in the head with a brick today. Maybe it will knock some sense into you.
I see you have no response, because you know the comment is true. You chose to live in a low-rent undesirable area, hoping it would gentrify. Now you are angry that that wish isn't coming true. Oh well.
Anonymous wrote:
I’m with pp. Mi Voz Cuenta. Sorry you don’t like it.
----
This comment is misplaced. Mi Voz Cuenta was a group of APAH and VOICE fronted families from S. Arlington who were advocating FOR their continued segregation in S. Arlington. These are the Nancy Van Doren/Tania Talento devotees who want to keep all the poor immigrant families together in S. Arlington. Not the people advocating for appropriately dispersed affordable housing.
Felt the need to correct that.
Anonymous wrote:Tipping point for what? And my kid is zoned for wburg in every scenario that I've seen, so not sure what you mean.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For other readers that prioritize demographics (better distribution of FARM students), what do you think about 1F vs 1H?
H decreases Kenmore to 45%, but leaves Williamsburg with only 4%, while F increases Kenmore to 53%, but keeps Williamsburg and the new school at over 10%. Is it more important to keep all schools below 50%, or is it better to make sure there is at least a small percentage at each school? I'm drawn to 1H, but worry that Williamsburg will become disconnected from the rest of the country by having such a minuscule percentage. Which of these is a better first step? Does anyone see ways to improve 1F to get Kenmore below 50? (without just shifting to Jefferson)
Not looking for a pound of flesh.
As a south Arlington parent I would love to see the diversity map that sliced vertically but I’m not naive.
Schools at 50% are unacceptable.
I really don’t want to hear people whining about their walk zones.
Schools at 50% poverty are unacceptable.
Who are you to decide that 50% poverty schools are unacceptable? Poverty is concentrated in undesirable areas with lower rents -- a problem that Arlington itself created. Too bad, so sad. It's like saying kids in NW DC should be bused to SE public schools to balance things out.
I hope you get hit in the head with a brick today. Maybe it will knock some sense into you.
I see you have no response, because you know the comment is true. You chose to live in a low-rent undesirable area, hoping it would gentrify. Now you are angry that that wish isn't coming true. Oh well.
There are countless studies that say there is a tipping point in poverty. 50% is way over it. Of course you know that, it’s why you don’t want to send your kid to Kenmore. Too bad so sad. Sorry you couldn’t afford country club hills. Keep on strivin’!