Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama spied on trump plain and simple. Just like Nixon spying on the DNC.
It's obvious Rice was caught lying. It seems Trump was right after all. Considering how he abused his power with the DOJ this is no surprise. Sounds like it's going to get worse for Obama. I'm sure he's not happy with Rice at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Obama spied on trump plain and simple. Just like Nixon spying on the DNC.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting that this subject is already 23 pages long. If there were absolutely nothing there, I don't think people would be asking questions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did Rice just said "I leaked nothing to nobody"?
Is she really THAT stupid?
She graduated from Stanford, so she must know double negative means she did leak it.
Proof positive that affirmative action is not a good thing.
Ouch!
I think she knows she goes down the hill.
I looked her up - she was valedictorian of her school. She's not stupid.
She is, however, a liar - and that was established long before this particular episode. She's going to be called before Congress to testify, and she'll either tell the truth (taking Obama down with her) or plead the 5th. My money's on the latter.
You forgot the third, more likely, option: she's going to tell the truth which is that one or more members of the Trump team were caught talking to Russia about cooperation and that conversation CAUSED their names to be unmasked so the US could know who it was, and they'll be dead to rights. People. This is what happened. It is ridiculous and ignorant to pretend otherwise.
If this is what actually happened, Obama's administration would reveal it during Trump's campaign. This would take Trump out of the election. Can you name me one reason why they didn't do that?
Because the investigation was ongoing and if Obama had done that republicans would have accused him of fixing the election to Hillary's benefit. He had to let it play out this way.
Anonymous wrote:You seriously think there wasn't collusion?
Yes. No collusion.
Again, the Russian's purpose is to sow dissent. They succeeded. They did not expect Trump to win--they were trying to marginalize HRC. Read the Intelligence Report that was released in January. It makes perfect sense.
As far as talking to the Russians, that goes on all the time. Press made a big deal about Sessions speaking to the ambassador--but he spoke to something like 25 ambassadors last year. Nothing burger.
You seriously think there wasn't collusion?
Anonymous wrote:Obama spied on trump plain and simple. Just like Nixon spying on the DNC.
Anonymous wrote:
They played right into the Russian's hand. Do you really think they were in collusion? Their purpose was to sow seeds of dissent in the US. They have succeeded in their mission--probably beyond expectations thanks to the "Resist" movement.
Anonymous wrote:Because the investigation was ongoing and if Obama had done that republicans would have accused him of fixing the election to Hillary's benefit. He had to let it play out this way.
Oh, Please.
They played right into the Russian's hand. Do you really think they were in collusion? Their purpose was to sow seeds of dissent in the US. They have succeeded in their mission--probably beyond expectations thanks to the "Resist" movement.
Because the investigation was ongoing and if Obama had done that republicans would have accused him of fixing the election to Hillary's benefit. He had to let it play out this way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did Rice just said "I leaked nothing to nobody"?
Is she really THAT stupid?
She graduated from Stanford, so she must know double negative means she did leak it.
Proof positive that affirmative action is not a good thing.
Ouch!
I think she knows she goes down the hill.
I looked her up - she was valedictorian of her school. She's not stupid.
She is, however, a liar - and that was established long before this particular episode. She's going to be called before Congress to testify, and she'll either tell the truth (taking Obama down with her) or plead the 5th. My money's on the latter.
You forgot the third, more likely, option: she's going to tell the truth which is that one or more members of the Trump team were caught talking to Russia about cooperation and that conversation CAUSED their names to be unmasked so the US could know who it was, and they'll be dead to rights. People. This is what happened. It is ridiculous and ignorant to pretend otherwise.
If this is what actually happened, Obama's administration would reveal it during Trump's campaign. This would take Trump out of the election. Can you name me one reason why they didn't do that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did Rice just said "I leaked nothing to nobody"?
Is she really THAT stupid?
She graduated from Stanford, so she must know double negative means she did leak it.
Proof positive that affirmative action is not a good thing.
Ouch!
I think she knows she goes down the hill.
I looked her up - she was valedictorian of her school. She's not stupid.
She is, however, a liar - and that was established long before this particular episode. She's going to be called before Congress to testify, and she'll either tell the truth (taking Obama down with her) or plead the 5th. My money's on the latter.
You forgot the third, more likely, option: she's going to tell the truth which is that one or more members of the Trump team were caught talking to Russia about cooperation and that conversation CAUSED their names to be unmasked so the US could know who it was, and they'll be dead to rights. People. This is what happened. It is ridiculous and ignorant to pretend otherwise.
If this is what actually happened, Obama's administration would reveal it during Trump's campaign. This would take Trump out of the election. Can you name me one reason why they didn't do that?