Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great Falls is quite beautiful. I assure you their citizens are nit concerned with you.
What does it mean to be a "citizen" of Great Falls? Did it just declare independence?
Anonymous wrote:Great Falls is quite beautiful. I assure you their citizens are nit concerned with you.
Anonymous wrote:
That's amazing. Someone's in trouble.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When did this thread turn into an Arlington/Lower McLean trollfest?
The lower McLean thing is not working...
The weekly McLean posts are not working, either.
It's hilarious that they get under your skin so much. The closer-in suburbs will always get more attention on this forum than Great Falls or Poolesville.
I live in McLean, and I find the weekly posts rather contrived and sad. Potential buyers are capable of making their own decisions without such idiocy and lunacy every week. Your beef with Great Falls is glaringly obvious. Just stop.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When did this thread turn into an Arlington/Lower McLean trollfest?
The lower McLean thing is not working...
The weekly McLean posts are not working, either.
It's hilarious that they get under your skin so much. The closer-in suburbs will always get more attention on this forum than Great Falls or Poolesville.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When did this thread turn into an Arlington/Lower McLean trollfest?
The lower McLean thing is not working...
The weekly McLean posts are not working, either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good houses in good locations in GF's are going under contract. Priced points from under 1m to over 2.5m.
Many are removed from sites fed by the mls when under contract. So people might buy a house on about 2 acres in GF for approx 9-2.5 instead of in Pimmit Hills.
I don't understand the second paragraph. Are you suggesting there is a unique practice of taking houses listed in Great Falls off the MLS, rather than showing them as under contract until closing? And what does that have to do with Pimmit Hills?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When did this thread turn into an Arlington/Lower McLean trollfest?
The lower McLean thing is not working...
Anonymous wrote:Good houses in good locations in GF's are going under contract. Priced points from under 1m to over 2.5m.
Many are removed from sites fed by the mls when under contract. So people might buy a house on about 2 acres in GF for approx 9-2.5 instead of in Pimmit Hills.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good houses in good locations in GF's are going under contract. Priced points from under 1m to over 2.5m.
Many are removed from sites fed by the mls when under contract. So people might buy a house on about 2 acres in GF for approx 9-2.5 instead of in Pimmit Hills.
I don't understand the second paragraph. Are you suggesting there is a unique practice of taking houses listed in Great Falls off the MLS, rather than showing them as under contract until closing? And what does that have to do with Pimmit Hills?
Anonymous wrote:Good houses in good locations in GF's are going under contract. Priced points from under 1m to over 2.5m.
Many are removed from sites fed by the mls when under contract. So people might buy a house on about 2 acres in GF for approx 9-2.5 instead of in Pimmit Hills.